Pin-Balling and Boners: The Posthuman Phallus and Intra-Activist Sexuality Assemblages in Secondary School

  • Emma Renold
  • Jessica Ringrose
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter explores how a feminist posthuman and new materialism research framework can help us to rethink and rework sexual regulation and harassment in secondary schools. We consider two case studies from our joint research project ‘Feminism in Schools: Mapping Impact in Practice’. Drawing on theoretical and methodological insights from Deleuze and Guattari, Rosi Braidotti and Karen Barad, we outline our ideas of enacting ‘posthuman feminist intra-activist research assemblages’. Using a diffractive lens to bring disparate moments of our research data together, we explore the fleshy materialism of phallogocentric touch, sound, and space. Politically, we engage with Barad’s notion of researcher ‘response-ability’ to consider what can and cannot be spoken about, and what is blocked, re-routed, and transformed in relation to sexualities research in secondary schools.

References

  1. Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. London: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Braidotti, R. (2010). Putting the active back into activism. New Formations, Special issue Deleuzian Politics? 68, 42–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Braidotti, R. (2013). The posthuman. London: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  4. Butler, J. (2004). Undoing Gender. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Davies, B. (2014). Reading anger in early childhood intra-actions: A diffractive analysis. Qualitative Inquiry, 20(6), 734–741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Deleuze, G., & Guatarri, F. (1987). A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia, trans. and Foreword by B. Massumi. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  7. Fox, N., & Alldred, P. (2013). The sexuality-assemblage: Desire, affect, anti-humanism. Sociological Review, 61, 766–789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Guattari, G. (1995/2005). Chaosmosis. An ethico-aesthetic paradigm. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Grosz, Elizabeth (1994). Volatile Bodies: Toward a Corporeal Feminism, Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Holford, N., Renold, E., & Huuki, T. (2013). What (else) can a kiss do? Theorizing the power plays in young children’s sexual cultures. Sexualities, 16, 710–729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Huuki, T., & Renold, E. (2015). Crush: Mapping historical, material and affective force relations in young children’s hetero-sexual playground play. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education (i-first). DOI:  10.1080/01596306.2015.1075730
  12. Jackson, S., & Weatherall, A. (2010). Dilemmas of delivery: Gender, health and formal sexuality education in New Zealand/Aotearoa classrooms. Women’s Studies Journal, 24(1), 47–59.Google Scholar
  13. Juelskjaer, M. (2013). Gendered subjectivities of spacetimematter. Gender and Education, 25(6), 754–768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Keller, J., & Ringrose, J. (2015): ‘But then feminism goes out the window!’: exploring teenage girls’ critical response to celebrity feminism, Celebrity Studies. DOI: 10.1080/19392397.2015.1005402 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Keller, J., Mendes, K., & and Ringrose, J. (2016). Speaking ‘unspeakable things:’ Documenting digital feminist responses to rape culture, Journal of Gender Studies. DOI: 10.1080/09589236.2016.1211511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lather, P., & St. Pierre, E. A. (2013). Post qualitative research (special issue). Qualitative Inquiry, 26(6), 629–633.Google Scholar
  17. Lenz-Taguchi, Hillevi & Anna Palmer (2013). ‘A More “Livable” School? A Diffractive Analysis of the Performative Enactments of Girls’ Ill-/Well-being With(in) School Environments’, Gender and Education, 25(6), 671–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lykke, N. (Ed.) (2013). Feminist studies : a guide to intersectional theory, methodology and writing, Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Markus, G., & Saka, E. (2006). Assemblage. Theory, Culture and Society, 23(2/3), 101–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Massumi, B. (2013). Semblance and event: Activist philosophy and the occurrent arts. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  21. Renold, E. (2013). Boys and Girls Speak Out: A Qualitative Study in Children’s Gender and Sexual Cultures. Cardiff, Wales: Cardiff University.Google Scholar
  22. Renold, E. (2016) “Feel what I feel”: making da(r)ta with teen girls for creative activisms on how sexual violence matters. Journal of Gender Studies.Google Scholar
  23. Renold, E., & Ivinson, G. M. (2014). Horse-girl assemblages: Towards a posthuman cartography of girls’ desire in an ex-mining valleys community. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 35, 361–376.Google Scholar
  24. Renold, E., & Ivinson, G. (2015). Mud, mermaid and burnt wedding dresses: Mapping queer belongings in teen girls’ talk on surviving the ordinary traumas of gender and sexual violence. In E. Renold, J. Ringrose, & D. Egan (Eds.), Children, sexuality and sexualisation (pp. 239–255). Buckingham: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Renold, E., & Ringrose, J. (2008). Regulation and Rupture: mapping tween and teenage girls’ ‘resistance’ to the heterosexual matrix, Feminist Theory: An International Interdisciplinary Journal, 9(3), 335–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Renold, E., & Ringrose, J. (2011). Schizoid subjectivities?: Re-theorising teen-girls’ sexual cultures in an era of ‘sexualisation’, Journal of Sociology: Special Issue: Youth Transitions, 47(4), 389–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Renold, E., & Ringrose, J. (2016). Selfies and relfies: Phallic tagging and posthuman part-icipations in teen digital sexuality assemblages. Educational Philosophy and Theory. Google Scholar
  28. Renold, E., & Ringrose, J. (2016). Selfies, Relfies and Phallic Tagging: Posthuman part-icipations in teen digital sexuality assemblages, Educational Philosophy and Theory Google Scholar
  29. Retallack, H. Ringrose, J., & Lawrence, E. (2016). ‘Fuck your body image’: Teen girls’ Twitter and Instagram feminism in and around school in J. Coffey Shelley Budgeon & Helen Cahill (Eds.) Learning Bodies: The Body in Youth and Childhood Studies (pp. TBA). London: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ringrose, J. (2015). Schizo-feminist educational research cartographies. Deleuze Studies, 9(3), 393–409. DOI: 10.3366/dls.2015.0194.
  31. Ringrose, J., & Renold, E. (2014) “F**k rape!”: Mapping affective intensities in a feminist research assemblage, Qualitative Inquiry, Special Issue: Analysis after Coding in Qualitative Inquiry 20(6), 772–780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ringrose, J., & Rawlings, V. (2015). Posthuman performativity, gender and ‘school bullying’: Exploring the material-discursive intra-actions of skirts, hair, sluts, and poofs. Confero: Essays on Education, Philosophy and Politics, DOI:  10.3384/confero.2001.4562.150626.
  33. Ringrose, J., & Renold, E. (2016). Cows, cabins and tweets: Posthuman intra-acting affect and feminist fires in secondary school. In C. Taylor, & C. Hughes (Eds.) Posthuman Research Practices in Education. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  34. Schott, R. M., & Søndergaard, D. M. (Eds.). (2014). School bullying: New theories in context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Taylor, C., & Ivinson, G. (2013). Material feminisms: New directions for education. Gender and Education, 25(6), 665–670.Google Scholar
  36. Taylor, C., & Hughes, C. (Eds.). (2016). Posthuman research practices in education. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  37. Taylor, C., & Ivinson, G. (Eds.). (2016). Material Feminisms and Education, Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Open Access This chapter is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License, which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

Authors and Affiliations

  • Emma Renold
    • 1
  • Jessica Ringrose
    • 2
  1. 1.Cardiff UniversityWalesUK
  2. 2.UCL Institute of EducationLondonUK

Personalised recommendations