Advertisement

The Case for a Rupture

  • Chris Nash
Chapter
  • 409 Downloads

Abstract

The chapter opens with an account of the cancellation of Hans Haacke’s 1971 scheduled solo exhibition at the Guggenheim Museum in New York, on the grounds that two of the works, Shapolsky and Goldman, were not art but journalism. Haacke has gone on to have a distinguished international career, and continued successfully to use the approach that was censored at the Guggenheim. Using these works and events as a springboard, the questions are posed: What is journalism? And what sort of journalism is art? The argument of the book is that while journalism is extensively studied as an object by other disciplines such as sociology and communications, the scholarship of journalism as a research practice in its own right is half a century or more behind the reflexive practice of leading practitioners. The case studies used to make the argument are Haacke’s art and two books by independent journalist I.F. Stone: The Hidden History of the Korean War 1950–1951 and The Trial of Socrates. The chapter considers in detail debates about whether journalism can be considered a discipline or is merely a craft. It references perspectives by Barbie Zelizer, James Carey, Stuart Adam, Gaye Tuchman and others to argue that journalism must be considered a discipline because it uses truth-seeking practices that are located in space and time and therefore amenable to ontological and epistemological interrogation. The chapter concludes by outlining the structure of the book and identifying the key thinkers whose conceptual frameworks will be explored with respect to the work of Haacke and Stone. Those thinkers are David Harvey and Henri Lefebvre on spatiotemporality, Michel-Rolph Trouillot on historiography and temporality, Pierre Bourdieu on field theory, and the Russian Constructivist Sergei Tretiakov on journalism as art.

Keywords

Truth Claim Democratic Practice Epistemological Disjunction Reflexive Practice Intellectual Rigour 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Bibliography

  1. Adam, G. Stuart. 1993. Notes towards a definition of journalism: Understanding an old craft as an art form. St. Petersburg: Poynter Institute for Media Studies.Google Scholar
  2. Adam, G. Stuart, and Roy Peter Clark (eds.). 2006. Journalism: The democratic craft. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Alberro, Alexander. 2003. Conceptual art and the politics of publicity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  4. Allan, Stuart (ed.). 2010. The Routledge companion to news and journalism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Anderson, C.W., Emily Bell, and Clay Shirky. 2012. Post-industrial journalism: Adapting to the present. New York: Tow Center for Digital Journalism, Columbia Journalism School.Google Scholar
  6. Aronowitz, Stanley. 2000. The knowledge factory: Dismantling the corporate university and creating true higher learning. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  7. Australian Research Council. 2008. ERA indicator descriptors. Retrieved August 29, 2013, from www.arc.gov.au/pdf/ERA_Indicator_Descriptors.pdf
  8. Bachelard, Gaston. 1986. The formation of the scientific mind: A contribution to a psychoanalysis of objective knowledge. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  9. Bacon, Wendy. 1997. Shifting notions of the public in journalism. Culture and Policy 8(2): 65–90.Google Scholar
  10. Bacon, Wendy. 1999. ‘What is a Journalist in a University?’ Media International Australia incorporating Culture and Policy, No. 92 (Feb): 79–90.Google Scholar
  11. ———. 1998a. Engaging theory and practice in journalism education. Asia Pacific Media Educator 1(1): 144–152.Google Scholar
  12. ———. 1998b. ‘In reply’ in Windschuttle, Keith; Breen, Myles P and Bacon, Wendy. Letters and Responses. Media International Australia, Incorporating Culture & Policy 87: 135–142.Google Scholar
  13. ———. 2006a. Journalism as research. Australian Journalism Review 28(2): 147–157.Google Scholar
  14. ———. 2006b. Journalism as research? Thinking about journalism research in an Australian context. Pacific Media Centre Online. www.pmc.aut.ac.nz/research/journalism-research-thinking-aboutjournalism-research-australian-context. Retrieved September 21, 2012.
  15. ———. 2011. Investigative journalism in the academy – Possibilities for storytelling across time and space. Pacific Journalism Review 17(1): 45–66.Google Scholar
  16. ———. 2012. An innovative direction in academic journalism. Pacific Journalism Review 18(2): 153–165.Google Scholar
  17. Berger, Guy. 2009. Book review: “Taking journalism seriously: News and the academy”. Journal of African Media Studies 1(2): 329–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Berger, Peter, and Thomas Luckmann. 1966. The social construction of reality. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  19. Bourdieu, Pierre. 1992. Language and symbolic power. Cambridge: Polity and Blackwell.Google Scholar
  20. Bourdieu, Pierre, and Roger Chartier. 2015. The sociologist and the historian. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  21. Bryan-Wilson, Julia. 2009. Art workers: Radical practice in the Vietnam War era. Oakland: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  22. Buchloh, Benjamin. 1984. From faktura to factography. October 30: 82–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. ———. 1988. Hans Haacke: Memory and instrumental reason. Art in America, February, p. 97.Google Scholar
  24. ———. 2006. Hans Haacke: From factographic sculpture to counter-monument. In Hans Haacke: For real: Works 1959–2006, eds. Matthias Flügge and Robert Fleck. Düsseldorf: Richter Verlag.Google Scholar
  25. Carey, James. 1996. Where journalism education went wrong. Paper presented to the 1996 Siegenthaler Conference on Journalism Education, the First Amendment Imperative, and the Changing Media Marketplace at Middle Tennessee State University. https://lindadaniele.wordpress.com/2010/08/11/carey-where-journalism-education-went-wrong/. Accessed 17 Apr 2017.
  26. ———. 1997. The dark continent of American journalism. In James Carey: A critical reader, eds. Eve Minson and Catherine Warren. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  27. ———. 2000. Some personal notes on US journalism education. Journalism 1(1): 12–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Conboy, Martin. 2011. Glimpses of potential amidst the devilish detail: Assessing research in journalism studies in the UK. Australian Journalism Review 33(1): 45–47.Google Scholar
  29. de Burgh, Hugo. 2003. Skills are not enough: The case for journalism as an academic discipline. Journalism 4(1): 95–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. DER BEVÖLKERUNG. http://www.derbevoelkerung.de/. Accessed 20 Apr 2016.
  31. Downie, Leonard, and Michael Schudson. 2009. The reconstruction of American journalism. Columbia Journalism Review Online. www.cjr.org/reconstruction/the_reconstruction_of_american.php. Accessed 20 Feb 2015.
  32. Ettema, James, and Theodore Glasser. 1998. Custodians of conscience: Investigative journalism and public virtue. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Ferro, Marc. 1985. ‘Moscow workers and the 1917 revolution’ (Book review). Annales. Histoire, Sciences Sociales 40(4): 847–850.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Finkenthal, Michael. 2001. Interdisciplinarity: Toward the definition of a metadiscipline? New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  35. ———. 2008. Complexity, multi-disciplinarity, and beyond. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  36. Flyvbjerg, Bent. 2001. Making social science matter: Why social inquiry fails and how it can succeed again. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Fore, Devin. 2006. The operative word in Soviet factography. October 118: 95–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Freidson, Eliot. 1994. Professionalism reborn: Theory, prophecy, and policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  39. Frodeman, Robert, et al. 2012. The Oxford handbook of interdisciplinarity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Fry, Edward. 2011 [1971]. Introduction to the work of Hans Haacke. In Hans Haacke 1967. Cambridge, MA: MIT List Visual Arts Center.Google Scholar
  41. Gitlin, Todd. 1980. The whole world is watching: Mass media in the making & unmaking of the new left. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  42. ———. 1987. The sixties: Years of hope, days of rage. Toronto/New York: Bantam Books.Google Scholar
  43. Goffman, Erving. 1974. Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Gorski, Philip. 2013b. Introduction. In Bourdieu and historical analysis, ed. Philip Gorski. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Grasskamp, Walter. 2006. Berlin New York Cologne Venice Berlin. In Hans Haacke: For real: Works 1959–2006, eds. Matthias Flügge and Robert Fleck. Düsseldorf: Richter Verlag.Google Scholar
  46. Harvey, David. 2006. Spaces of global capitalism. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  47. Hobsbawm, Eric. 1995. The age of extremes: The short twentieth century. London: Abacus.Google Scholar
  48. Hughes, Everett. 1964. Men and their work. Glencoe: Free Press.Google Scholar
  49. Klein, Julie. 1990. Interdisciplinarity: History, theory and practice. Detroit: Wayne Sate University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Klinenberg, Eric. 2005. Convergence: News production in a digital age. In Cultural production in a digital age, ed. Eric Klinenberg. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  51. Kuhn, Thomas. 1962. The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  52. Löffelholz, Martin, and David Weaver. 2008. Global journalism research: Theories, methods, findings, future. Malden: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
  53. Macgilchrist, Felicitas. 2007. Book review. Taking journalism seriously: News and the academy. Discourse & Society 18(5): 684.Google Scholar
  54. McKay, Jenny. 2006. Book review. Taking journalism seriously: News and the academy. Media, Culture & Society 28(3): 477–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Merrill, John, et al. 2001. Twilight of press freedom: The rise of people’s journalism. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  56. Mills, C. Wright. 2000. On intellectual craftmanship. In The sociological imagination. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  57. Nash, Chris. 2013. Journalism as a research discipline. Pacific Journalism Review 19(2): 123–135.Google Scholar
  58. ———. 2014. Research degrees in journalism: What is an exegesis? Pacific Journalism Review 20(1): 76–98.Google Scholar
  59. Niblock, Sarah. 2007. From ‘Knowing How’ to ‘Being Able’: Negotiating the meanings of reflective practice and reflexive research in journalism studies. Journalism Practice 1(1): 30–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. ———. 2012. Envisioning journalism practice as research. Journalism Practice 6(4): 497–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Park, Robert. 2006 [1955]. News as a form of knowledge. In Journalism: The democratic craft, eds. G. Stuart Adam and Roy Peter Clark. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  62. Phillips, E. Barbara. 1976. What is news: Novelty without change. Journal of Communication 26(4): 87–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Protess, David, et al. 1991. The journalism of outrage: Investigative reporting and agenda building in America. New York: Guildford Press.Google Scholar
  64. Repko, Allen. 2012. Interdisciplinary research: Process and theory. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  65. Said, Edward. 1994. Representations of the intellectual. London: Vintage.Google Scholar
  66. Schudson, Michael, and Chris Anderson. 2009. Objectivity, professionalism, and truth seeking in journalism. In The handbook of journalism studies, eds. Karin Wahl-Jorgensen and Thomas Hanitzsch. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  67. Smith, Roberta. 1992. Obituary. Edward F. Fry, 56, a historian devoted to 20th-century art. The New York Times, April 21.Google Scholar
  68. Steinberg, Will. 1986. Some of Hans Haacke’s works considered as fine art. In Hans Haacke: Unfinished business, ed. Brian Wallis. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
  69. Stone, I. F. 1973. Notes on closing, but not in farewell. In The best of I.F. Stone’s weekly, ed. Neil Middleton. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
  70. Swartz, David. 2013. Metaprinciples for sociological research in a Bourdieusian perspective. In Bourdieu and historical analysis, ed. Philip Gorski. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  71. Sylvan, David, et al. 1993. Knowledges: Historical and critical studies in disciplinarity. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia.Google Scholar
  72. Thompson, J.D. 1956. On building an administrative science. Administrative Science Quarterly 1(1): 102–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Tiffen, Rodney. 2012. Media review gets unjustified bad press. The Australian Financial Review, March 20.Google Scholar
  74. Tracey, James. 2006. Book review. Journal of Communication Inquiry 30(3): 279–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Trouillot, Michel-Rolph. 1995. Silencing the past: Power and the production of history. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  76. Tuchman, Gaye. 1972. Objectivity as strategic ritual: An examination of Newsman’s notions of objectivity. The American Journal of Sociology 77(4): 660–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. ———. 1978. Making news: A study in the construction of reality. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  78. ———. 2009. Wannabe U: Inside the corporate university. Chicago: Chicago University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Wahl-Jorgensen, Karin, and Thomas Hanitzsch. 2009. The handbook of journalism studies. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  80. Weick, Karl. 1996. Drop your tools: An allegory for organizational studies. Administrative Science Quarterly 41(2): 301–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Weinberg, Darin. 2002. Qualitative research methods. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  82. Zelizer, Barbie. 2004. Taking journalism seriously: News and the academy. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  83. ———. 2008. How communication, culture, and critique intersect in the study of journalism. Communication, Culture & Critique 1(1): 86–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. ———. 2009. Journalism and the academy. In The handbook of journalism studies, eds. Karin Wahl-Jorgensen and Thomas Hanitzsch. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  85. ———. 2010. Journalists as interpretive communities, revisited. In The Routledge companion to news and journalism, ed. Stuart Allan. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chris Nash
    • 1
  1. 1.Monash UniversityCaulfield EastAustralia

Personalised recommendations