Skip to main content

1600: The Dynastic Cycle

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Singularity of Western Innovation
  • 383 Accesses

Abstract

In the year 1600, reigning dynasties appeared to be coming to an end in several states across Eurasia. The symptoms of progressive decline were evident in the autocratic regimes that ruled over England, the Ottoman Empire, India and China. Their problems were not only dynastic but also military and fiscal. In each state, the customary rule for succession was questioned. In addition, powerful internal interest groups opposed the sovereign’s power. Militarily, each of the four states was threatened from both within and without. Finally, each regime was desperately trying to discover a means of financing greatly enlarged armed forces whose personnel had to be paid regularly in cash. Would each dynastic cycle continue under a new lineage or would some alternative form of governance be found?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Archer, I. W. (2011). Commerce and consumption. In S. Doran & N. Jones (Eds.), The Elizabethan world (pp. 411–426). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bada’uni, A.-Q. (1898). Muntakhabu-t-tawārīkh (Selections from Histories) (trans: Ranking, G.). Kolkota: Asiatic Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, J. B. (1936). The reign of Elizabeth 1558–1603. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broadberry, S., Guan, H., & Li, D. D. (2014). China, Europe and the great divergence: A study in historical national accounting, 980–1850. Retrieved October 17, 2016, from eh.net. http://eh.net/eha/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/Broadberry.pdf

  • Brook, T. (2013). The troubled empire: China in the Yuan and Ming dynasties. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Q. (2015). Climate shocks, dynastic cycles and nomadic conquests: Evidence from historical China. Oxford Economic Papers, 67, 185–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cizakca, M. (2013). The Ottoman government and economic life: Taxation, public finance and trade controls. In S. N. Faroqhi & K. Fleet (Eds.), The Cambridge history of Turkey (Vol. 2, pp. 241–275). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crossley, P. K. (1997). The Manchus. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dash, M. (2012). The Ottoman Empire’s life-or-death race. Retrieved October 5, 2015, from smithsonian.com. http://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/the-ottoman-empires-life-or-death-race-164064882/?no-ist

  • Doran, S. (2003). Queen Elizabeth I. London: The British Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doran, S. (2006). James VI and the English succession. In R. Houlbrooke (Ed.), James VI and I: Ideas, authority and government (pp. 25–42). Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreyer, E. L. (1988). Military origins of Ming China. In D. Twitchett & F. W. Mote (Eds.), Cambridge history of China, vol. 7, The Ming Dynasty, 1368–1644, part 1 (pp. 58–106). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebrey, P. B. (1996). The Cambridge illustrated history of China. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, M. C. (2001). The Manchu way: The eight banners and ethnic identity in late imperial China. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, C. (1983). The first Elizabeth. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falls, C. (1950). Elizabeth’s Irish Wars. London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, J. (1998). Lords of the horizons: A history of the Ottoman Empire. New York: Henry Holt and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greif, A., & Tabellini, G. (2010). Cultural and institutional bifurcation: China and Europe compared. American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings, 100(2), 135–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, R. (1974). Taxation and governmental finance in sixteenth-century Ming China. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, R. (1998). The Ming fiscal administration. In D. Twitchett & F. W. Mote (Eds.), The Cambridge history of China, vol. 8, The Ming Dynasty, 1368–1644, part 2 (pp. 106–171). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inalcik, H. (1973). The Ottoman Empire: The classical age 1300–1600. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, N. D., & Koyama, M. (2014). Tax farming and the origins of state capacity in England and France. Explorations in Economic History, 51, 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karateke, H. T. (2012). ‘On the tranquility and repose of the Sultan’: The construction of a topos. In C. Woodhead (Ed.), The Ottoman world (pp. 116–129). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keay, J. (2000). India: A history. New York: Grove Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacMillan, K. (2011). Exploration, trade and empire. In S. Doran & N. Jones (Eds.), The Elizabethan world (pp. 646–662). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maddison, A. (2007). Contours of the world economy, 1-2030 AD: Essays in macro-economic history. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metcalf, B. D., & Metcalf, T. R. (2006). A concise history of modern india (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pamuk, Ş. (2000). A monetary history of the Ottoman Empire. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peck, L. L. (1993). Court patronage and corruption in early Stuart England. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quataert, D. (2005). The Ottoman Empire 1700–1922 (2nd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, J. F. (1993). The Mughal empire. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, V. A. (1917). Akbar: The great Mogul 1542–1605. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tezcan, B. (2010). The second Ottoman Empire: Political and social transformation in the early modern world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trimble, W. R. (1950). Early Tudor historiography, 1485–1548. Journal of the History of Ideas, 11, 30–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turchin, P., & Nefedov, S. A. (2009). Secular cycles. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ursinus, M. (2012). The transformation of the Ottoman fiscal regime, c. 1600–1850. In C. Woodhead (Ed.), The Ottoman world (pp. 423–435). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Glahn, R. (2016). The economic history of China: From antiquity to the nineteenth century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, L.-S. (1954). Toward a study of dynastic configurations in Chinese history. Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies, 17, 329–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dudley, L. (2017). 1600: The Dynastic Cycle. In: The Singularity of Western Innovation. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-39822-2_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-39822-2_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-40317-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-39822-2

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics