Discourse, Myths and Emotions in EU Politics

  • Kennet LynggaardEmail author
Part of the Palgrave Studies in European Union Politics book series (PSEUP)


This chapter carries the study of political myths and emotions into the discursive institutionalism. It argues that political myths and emotions are crucial for understanding both how the constitution of the European Union becomes a political reality and how the integration process occurs. Appeals to political myths and emotions clearly play a role—perhaps even a key role—in communicating and legitimising EU policy and institutional choices, yet the key argument in this chapter is that political emotions are also crucial to understanding coordination among political elites. The political roles of myths and emotions are illustrated by examples of the role and emotional appeal of ‘green Europe’ and ‘social Europe’ among transnational non-governmental organisations.


  1. Atkinson, J. R., & Davoudi, S. (2000). The Concept of Social Exclusion in the European Union: Context, Development and Possibilities. Journal of Common Market Studies, 38(3), 427–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baker, S. (2007). Sustainable Development as Symbolic Commitment: Declaratory Politics and the Seductive Appeal of Ecological Modernisation in the European Union. Environmental Politics, 16(2), 297–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bakker, B. N. (2016). Personality and European Union Attitudes: Relationships Across European Union Attitude Dimensions. European Union Politics, 17(1), 25–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boomgaarden, H. G., Schuck, A. R. T., Elenbaas, M., & de Vreese, C. H. (2011). Mapping EU Attitudes: Conceptual and Empirical Dimensions of Euroscepticism and EU Support. European Union Politics, 12(2), 241–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bottici, C. (2007). A Philosophy of Political Myths. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bourne, A. (2015). European Identity: Conflict and Cooperation. In K. Lynggaard, I. Manners, & K. Löfgren (Eds.), Research Methods in European Union Studies (pp. 55–71). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  7. Brader, T. (2005). Striking a Responsive Chord: How Political Ads Motivate and Persuade Voters by Appealing to Emotions. American Journal of Political Science, 49(2), 388–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brand, C. (2011, April 19). MEP Calls for Europe 2020 to Be “Budget Priority”. European Voice. Accessed August 2015.
  9. Businesseurope. (32 Issues from 1999 to 2014, a, b). Biannual Economic Outlook. Brussels: Businesseurope.Google Scholar
  10. Crawford, N. (2000). The Passion of World Politics: Propositions on Emotion and Emotional Relationships. International Security, 24(4), 116–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cullen, P. (2010). The Platform of European Social NGOs: Ideology, Division and Coalition. Journal of Political Ideologies, 15(3), 317–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Della Sala, V. (2010). Political Myth, Mythology and the European Union. Journal of Common Market Studies, 48(1), 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Edelman, M. (1977). Political Language: Words That Succeed and Policies That Fail. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  14. Elster, J. (1999). Alchemies of the Mind: Rationality and the Emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  15. European Commission. (2010, March 3). EUROPE 2020: A Strategy for Smart, Sustainable and Inclusive Growth (Communication from the Commission Brussels). Bruxelles: European Commission.Google Scholar
  16. European Environmental Bureau. (20 Issues from 2005 to 2014, a, b). Biannual Memorandum to Council Presidency. Bruxelles: European Environmental Bureau. Accessed April 2016.
  17. European Environmental Bureau. (2009c, October). Metamorphosis (Newsletter #55). Accessed August 2015.
  18. European Parliament. (2009, December 15). Debates. Accessed August 2015.
  19. European Trade Union Confederation. (13 Issues from 2000 to 2013). Annual Resolution. Brussels: European Trade Union Confederation.Google Scholar
  20. Ferrera, M. (2014). Ideology, Parties and Social Politics in Europe. West European Politics, 37(2), 420–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Garry, J. (2014). Emotions and Voting in EU Referendums. European Union Politics, 15(2), 235–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hajer, M. A. (1995). The Politics of Environmental Discourse: Ecological Modernisation and the Policy Process. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  23. Hannes-Magnusson, H., & Wiener, A. (2010). Studying Contemporary Constitutionalism: Memory, Myth and Horizon. Journal of Common Market Studies, 48(1), 21–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hansen, L., & Williams, M. C. (1999). The Myth of Europe: Legitimacy, Community and the “Crisis” of the EU. Journal of Common Market Studies, 37(2), 233–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kahn-Nisser, S. (2013). Conditionality, Communication and Compliance: The Effect of Monitoring on Collective Labour Rights in Candidate Countries. Journal of Common Market Studies, 51(6), 1040–1056.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kølvraa, C. (2016). European Fantasies: On the EU’s Political Myths and the Affective Potential of Utopian Imaginaries for European Identity. Journal of Common Market Studies, 54(1), 169–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lenschow, A., & Sprungk, C. (2010). The Myth of a Green Europe. Journal of Common Market Studies, 48(1), 133–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lieberman, S., & Gray, T. (2007). The Role of Political Myth in the International Conflict over Genetically Modified Foods and Crops. European Environment, 17(6), 376–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lundvall, B.-Å., & Lorenz, E. (2012). From Lisbon Strategy to Europe 2020. In N. Morel, B. Palier, & J. Palme (Eds.), Towards a Social Investment Welfare State? Ideas, Policies and Challenges (pp. 333–353). Bristol: The Policy Press.Google Scholar
  30. Lynggaard, K. (2017). Exploring the Emotional Appeal of Green and Social Europe Myths Among Pan-European Union Organisations. Journal of European Public Policy, 24(10), 1409–1429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Manners, I. (2011). Symbolism in European integration. Comparative European Politics, 9(3), 243–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Manners, I. (2014, November 28–29). The European Union’s Institutionalisation of Symbols and Myths. Paper Presented at 3rd Midterm Conference of the European Political Sociology Research Network of ESA (European Sociological Association), Europe’s Global Challenges: Society, Politics, Markets, University of Copenhagen.Google Scholar
  33. Manners, I., & Murray, P. (2016). The End of a Noble Narrative? European Integration Narratives After the Nobel Peace Prize. Journal of Common Market Studies, 54(1), 185–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Marcus, G. E. (2000). Emotions in Politics. In N. Polsby (Ed.), Annual Review of Political Science (pp. 221–250). Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Marcus, G. E. (2003). The Psychology of Emotion and Politics. In L. Huddy, D. Sears, & R. Jervis (Eds.), Oxford Handbook of Political Psychology (pp. 182–221). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Matsumoto, D., Hwang, H. C., & Frank, M. G. (2013). Emotional Language and Political Aggression. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 32(4), 452–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. McNamara, K. R. (2015). The Politics of Everyday Europe: Constructing Authority in the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mendez, C. (2013). The Post-2013 Reform of EU Cohesion Policy and the Place-Based Narrative. Journal of European Public Policy, 20(5), 639–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Neuman, R., Marcus, G. E., Crigler, A. N., & Mackuen, M. (2007). The Affect Effect: Dynamics of Emotion in Political Thinking and Behavior. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  40. Obradovic, D. (1996). Policy Legitimacy and the European Union. Journal of Common Market Studies, 34(2), 191–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Platform of European Social NGOs. (11 Issues from 2002 to 2012, a). Social Platform Annual Report. Brussels: Platform of European Social NGOs. Accessed April 2016.
  42. Platform of European Social NGOs. (11 Issues from 2002 to 2012, b). Work Programme of the Social Platform. Brussels: Platform of European Social NGOs. Accessed April 2016.
  43. Redlawsk, D. P. (Ed.). (2006). Feeling Politics. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  44. Ross, A. A. G. (2006). Coming in from the Cold: Constructivism and Emotions. European Journal of International Relations, 12(2), 197–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Spring Alliance. (2009). For a European Union That Puts People and Planet First. Manifesto. Accessed November 2015.
  46. Spring Alliance. (2014). A Better Europe Now. Manifesto II. Accessed November 2015.
  47. Stråth, B. (2005). Methodological and Substantive Remarks on Myth, Memory and History in the Construction of a European Community. German Law Journal, 6, 255–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Taylor, S. (2010, March 31). Backing for Europe 2020. European Voice. Accessed August 2015.
  49. Vasilopoulou, S., & Wagner, M. (2017). Fear, Anger and Enthusiasm About the European Union: Effects of Emotional Reactions on Public Preferences Towards European Integration. European Union Politics, 18(3), 382–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Warleigh-Lack, A. (2010). Greening the European Union for Legitimacy? A Cautionary Reading of Europe 2020. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 23(4), 297–311.Google Scholar
  51. Wueest, B., & Fossati, F. (2015). Quantitative Discursive Institutionalism: A Comparison of Labour Market Policy Discourse Across Western Europe. Journal of European Public Policy, 22(5), 708–730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Zaiotti, R. (2011). Performing Schengen: Myths, Rituals and the Making of European Territoriality Beyond Europe. Review of International Studies, 37(2), 537–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Zeitlin, J. (2010). Towards a Stronger OMC: A New Governance Architecture for EU Policy Coordination. In E. Marlier, D. Natali, & R. Van Dam, (Eds.), Europe 2020: Towards a More Social EU? (pp. 253–273). Brussels: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Social Sciences and BusinessRoskilde UniversityRoskildeDenmark

Personalised recommendations