Advertisement

Working with Children with Learning Disabilities

Vulnerabilities, Needs and Rights; Direct Work with Children with Learning Disabilities; Empowering Families to Protect Children
  • Adele D. Jones
  • Ena Trotman Jemmott
  • Hazel Da Breao
  • Priya E. Maharaj
Chapter
  • 283 Downloads

Abstract

In this part of the book, we focus on the rights of children with learning disabilities to be protected from abuse and we also discuss strategies for family support. The case study highlights issues of loss, non-family abuse and the impact on parenting capacity of alcohol misuse. The discussion emphasises the importance of taking into account children’s communication needs, intellectual impairments and any specific abilities and interests the child has in the planning of interventions. Two approaches to practice are provided for working with children, and two for empowering families. Although we have applied these methods to children with learning disabilities and their families, they can be adapted for many children and the family-based approaches are generic.

Keywords

Sexual Abuse Down Syndrome Child Sexual Abuse Disable Child Child Protection 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Ainsworth, M. D. S. & Bell, S. M. (1970). Attachment, exploration, and separation: Illustrated by the behavior of one-year-olds in a strange situation. Child Development, 41, 49–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allington-Smith, P., Ball, R., & Haytor, R. (2002). Management of sexually abused children with learning disabilities. Advances in Psychiatric Treatment, 8 (1) 66–72. http://apt.rcpsych.org/content/8/1/66. Accessed August 3, 2015.
  3. Angelides, P., & Michaelidou, A. (2009). The deafening silence: Discussing children’s drawings for understanding and addressing marginalization. Journal of Early Childhood Research, 7(1), 27–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment: Attachment and loss: Vol. 1, Loss. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  5. Brown, S., & Manning, W. (2009). Family boundary ambiguity and the measurement of family structure: The significance of cohabitation. Demography, 46, 85–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Case, C., & Dalley, T. (2002). Working with children in art therapy (1st ed.). London: Tavistock/Routledge Publication.Google Scholar
  7. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (2006). Improved national prevalence estimates for 18 selected major birth defects–United States, 1999-2001. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 54 (51): 1301–1305, www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16397457/. Accessed September 29, 2014.
  8. Dickinson, J. J., Poole, D. A., & Bruck, M. (2005). Back to the future: A comment on the use of anatomical dolls in forensic interviews. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 5(1), 63–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Edwards, L., & Crocker, S. (2007). Psychological processes in deaf children with complex needs: An evidence-based practical guide. Great Britain: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.Google Scholar
  10. Faller, K. C. (2005). Anatomical dolls: Their use in assessment of children who may have been sexually abused. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 14(3), 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Finkelhor, D., & Berliner, L. (1995). Research on the treatment of sexually abused children: A review and recommendations. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 34, 19–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gauthier, L., Stollak, G., Mess, E., & Aronoff, J. (1996). Recall of childhood neglect and physical abuse as differential predictors of current psychological functioning. Child Abuse & Neglect, 20, 549–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gilbert, R., Kemp, A., Thoburn, J., Sidebotham, P., Radford, L., Glaser, D., et al. (2009a). Recognising and responding to child maltreatment. The Lancet, 373(9658), 167–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gilbert, R., Widom, C. S., Browne, K., Fergusson, D., Webb, E., & Janson, S. (2009b). Burden and consequences of child maltreatment in high-income countries. The Lancet, 373(9657), 68–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gillespie, D., & Campbell, F. (2011). Effect of stroke on family carers and family relationships. Nursing Standard, 26, 39–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Goff, B. S., & Smith, D. B. (2005). Systemic traumatic stress: The couple adaptation to traumatic stress model. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 31, 145–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Greenstone, J. L., & Leviton, S. C. (2002). Elements of crisis intervention: Crises and how to respond to them. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
  18. Hahn, L. J., Fidler, D. J., Hepburn, S. L., & Rogers, S. J. (2013). Early intersubjective skills and the understanding of intentionality in young children with down syndrome. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34(12), 4455–4465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hoff, L. A. (2009). People in crisis: Clinical and diversity perspectives (6th ed.). New York, NY: Routledge Press. http://www.nhslothian.scot.nhs.uk/Services/A-Z/LearningDisabilities/CurrentReports/ChildProtectionNeedsOfChildrenYoungPeople.pdf. Accessed October 1, 2014.
  20. James, R. K., & Gilliland, B. E. (2013). Crisis intervention strategies (7th ed.). Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole, Cengage.Google Scholar
  21. Jones, A. D. & Trotman Jemmott, E. (2009). Child sexual abuse in the Eastern Caribbean. www.unicef.org/infobycountry/files/Child_Sexual_Abuse_in_the_Eastern_Caribbean_Final_9_Nov.pdf. Accessed April 3, 2015.
  22. Kendall-Tackett, K. A., Meyer-Williams, L., & Finkelhor, D. (1993). Impact of sexual abuse on children: A review and synthesis of recent empirical studies. Psychological Bulletin, 113, 164–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Knoke, D. (2009). Family group conferencing in child welfare, CECW information sheet. Toronto: Centres of Excellence for Children’s Wellbeing. http://cwrp.ca/sites/default/files/publications/en/FGC77E.pdf. Accessed August 6, 2015.
  24. Kvam, M. H. (2004). Sexual abuse of deaf children. A retrospective analysis of the prevalence and characteristics of childhood sexual abuse among deaf adults in Norway. Child Abuse & Neglect, 28(3), 241–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Malchiodi, C. A. (Ed.) (2014a). Creative arts and play therapy: Creative interventions with traumatized children (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  26. Malchiodi, C. A. (Ed.) (2014b). Creative interventions with traumatized children. New York: Guildford Press.Google Scholar
  27. Malchiodi, C. A. (2014c). Creative interventions and childhood trauma. In C. A. Malchiodi (Ed.), Creative interventions with traumatized children (pp. 3–21). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  28. Myer, R. A., Williams, R. C., Haley, M., Brownfield, J. N., McNicols, K. B., & Pribozie, N. (2014). Crisis intervention with families: Assessing changes in family characteristics. The Family Journal, 22(2), 179–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ney, P. G., Fung, T., & Wickett, A. R. (1994). The worst combinations of child abuse and neglect. Child Abuse & Neglect, 18, 705–714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pakura, S. (2005). The Family Group Conference 14 Year Journey: Celebrating the successes, learning the lessons, embracing the challenges, Paper from ‘Builiding Global Alliances for Restorative Practices and FamilyGoogle Scholar
  31. Parad, H. J., & Parad, L. G. (Eds.) (1990). Crisis intervention book 2: The practitioner’s sourcebook for brief therapy. Family Service America: Milwaukee 3/4.Google Scholar
  32. Paul, R. (2007). Language disorders from infancy through adolescence: Assessment and intervention. Philadelphia: Elsevier Health Sciences.Google Scholar
  33. Poulin-Dubois, D., Brooker, I., & Chow, V. (2009). The developmental origins of naïve psychology in infancy. Advances in Child Development and Behavior, 37, 55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rapoport, L. (1970). Crisis intervention as a mode of brief treatment. Theories of social casework, 265–371.Google Scholar
  35. Reiter, S., Bryen, D. N., & Shachar, I. (2007). Adolescents with intellectual disabilities as victims of abuse. Journal of Intellectual Disabilities, 11(4), 371–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Roizen, N. J. (2007). Down syndrome. In M. L. Batshaw, L. Pellegrino, & N. J. Roizen (Eds.), Children with disabilities (pp. 263–273). Baltimore: Brookes.Google Scholar
  37. Rosenfeld, L. B., Caye, J. S., Avalon, O., & Lahad, M. (2005). When their worlds falls apart: Helping families and children manage the effects of disasters. Washington, DC: National Association of Social Workers Press.Google Scholar
  38. Sagar, C. (2002). Working with cases of child sexual abuse. In C. Case & T. Dalley (Eds.), Working with children in art therapy (pp. 89–114). London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  39. Santen, B. (2014). Treating dissociation in traumatized children with body maps. In C. A. Malchiodi (Ed.), Creative interventions with traumatized children (2nd ed. pp. 126–149). New York: Guildford Press.Google Scholar
  40. Stalker, K., Green Lister, P., Lerpiniere, J., & McArthur, K. (2010). Child protection and the needs and rights of disabled children and young people: A scoping study. Scotland: University of Strathclyde.Google Scholar
  41. Steinhardt, L. (1985). Freedom within boundaries: Body outline drawings in art therapy with children. The Arts in Psychotherapy, 12(1), 25–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sullivan, P. M., & Knutson, J. F. (2000). Maltreatment and disabilities: A population-based epidemiological study. Child Abuse and Neglect, 24(10), 1257–1273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Tjersland, O. A., Mossige, S., Gulbrandsen, W., Jensen, T. K., & Reichelt, S. (2006). Helping families when child sexual abuse is suspected but not proven. Child and Family Social Work, 11, 297–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Trevarthen, C., & Aitken, K. J. (2001). Infant intersubjectivity: Research, theory, and clinical applications. Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, 42(1), 3–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. US Department of Health and Human Services. (1994). Crisis intervention in child abuse and neglect. Washington: US Department of Health and Human Services, www.childwelfare.gov/pubs/usermanuals/crisis/index.cfm. Accessed October 6, 2014.
  46. Welsh, T. (2007). Child’s play: Anatomically correct dolls and embodiment. Human Studies, 30(3), 255–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Adele D. Jones
    • 1
  • Ena Trotman Jemmott
    • 2
  • Hazel Da Breao
    • 3
  • Priya E. Maharaj
    • 4
  1. 1.The University of HuddersfieldHuddersfieldUK
  2. 2.Florencena ConsultingBridgetownBarbados
  3. 3.Sweet Water FoundationGrenadaGrenada
  4. 4.The Alpine ProjectLa RomaineTrinidad and Tobago

Personalised recommendations