Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)politeness pp 199–225Cite as

Palgrave Macmillan

Impoliteness

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

This chapter focuses on genuine linguistic impoliteness, that is to say, linguistic material that is associated with offensive effects. It discusses some of the most central concepts and features of impoliteness (meta-language, intentionality and emotions), and includes a brief overview of the rapid development of this field of research, highlighting a recent shift away from impoliteness strategies to impoliteness formulae. Some co-textual issues (e.g. how one responds to impoliteness) and contextual issues (e.g. the role of power) that are especially important to impoliteness are covered. A case study, spanning both traditional and new media, demonstrates the practicalities of analysis, concentrating on impoliteness formulae, power and context. Finally, the chapter suggests areas of future development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   299.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See: http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/words/the-oxford-english-corpus

  2. 2.

    https://twitter.com/BrittMcHenry/status/588798710684987393

References

  • Arundale, R.B. 1999. An Alternative Model and Ideology of Communication for an Alternative to Politeness Theory. Pragmatics 9 (1): 119–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Austin, J.P.M. 1987. The Dark Side of Politeness: A Pragmatic Analysis of Non-Cooperative Communication. Christchurch: University of Canterbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1990. Politeness Revisited – the Dark Side. In New Zealand Ways of Speaking English, ed. A. Bell and J. Holmes, 277–293. Avon: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avgerinakou, A. 2003. ‘Flaming’ in Computer-Mediated Interactions. In Rethinking Communicative Interaction, ed. C.B. Grant, 273–293. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Baron, R.A., and D.R. Richardson. 1994. Human Aggression. New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernal, M. 2008. Do Insults Always Insult? Genuine Politeness Versus Non-genuine Politeness in Colloquial Spanish (¿Insultan los insultos? Descortesía auténtica vs. descortesía no auténtica en el español coloquial). Pragmatics 18 (4): 775–802.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blas Arroyo, J.L. 2001. “No diga chorradas…” La descortesía en el debate político cara a cara. Una aproximación pragma-variacionista. Oralia 4: 9–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blitvich, P.G.-C. 2010. The YouTubification of Politics, Impoliteness and Polarization. In Handbook of Research on Discourse Behavior and Digital Communication: Language Structures and Social Interaction, ed. R. Taiwo, 540–563. Hershey: Information Science Reference.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bousfield, D. 2007. Impoliteness, Preference Organization and Conductivity. Multilingua 26 (1–2): 1–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2008. Impoliteness in Interaction. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2010. Researching Impoliteness and Rudeness: Issues and Definitions. In Interpersonal Pragmatics (Vol. 6, Handbook of Pragmatics), ed. M.A. Locher and S.L. Graham, 101–134. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bousfield, D., and M.A. Locher. 2008. Impoliteness in Language: Studies on Its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, P., and S.C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burman, M., J. Brown, K. Tisdall, and S. Batchelor. 2002. A View from the Girls: Exploring Violence and Violent Behaviour: British Economic and Social Research Council Research Report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carney, T. 2014. Being (Im)polite: A Forensic Linguistic Approach to Interpreting a Hate Speech Case. Language Matters 45 (3): 325–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cashman, H.R. 2006. Impoliteness in Children’s Interactions in a Spanish/English Bilingual Community of Practice. Journal of Politeness Research: Language, Behaviour, Culture 2 (2): 217–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craig, R., K. Tracy, and F. Spisak. 1986. The Discourse of Requests: Assessment of a Politeness Approach. Human Communication Research 12: 437–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Culpeper, J. 1996. Towards an Anatomy of Impoliteness. Journal of Pragmatics 25: 349–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2005. Impoliteness and Entertainment in the Television Quiz Show: The Weakest Link. Journal of Politeness Research: Language, Behaviour, Culture 1 (1): 35–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2009. The Metalanguage of Impoliteness: Explorations in the Oxford English Corpus. In Contemporary Corpus Linguistics, ed. P. Baker. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2011a. Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2011b. Politeness and Impoliteness. In Sociopragmatics, ed. K. Aijmer and G. Andersen, vol. 5. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2013. Impoliteness: Questions and Answers. In Aspects of Linguistic Impoliteness, ed. D. Jamet and M. Jobert, 2–15. London: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Culpeper, J., D. Bousfield, and A. Wichmann. 2003. Impoliteness Revisited: With Special Reference to Dynamic and Prosodic Aspects. Journal of Pragmatics 35 (10–11): 1545–1579.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Culpeper, J., G. Schauer, L.M. Marti, M. Mei, and M. Nevala. 2014. Impoliteness and Emotions in a Cross-Cultural Perspective. SPELL: Swiss Papers in English Language and Literature 30: 67–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diani, G. 2015. Politeness. In Corpus Pragmatics: A Handbook, ed. K. Aijmer and C. Rühlemann, 169–194. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dobs, A.M., and P. Garcés-Conejos Blitvich. 2013. Impoliteness in Polylogal Interaction: Accounting for Face-Threat Witnesses’ Responses. Journal of Pragmatics 53: 112–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dynel, M. 2015. The Landscape of Impoliteness Research. Journal of Politeness Research 11 (2): 329–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eelen, G. 2001. A Critique of Politeness Theories. Manchester: St. Jerome Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, T.J., and B.G. Rule. 1983. An Attributional Perspective on Anger and Aggression. In Aggression: Theoretical and Empirical Reviews, ed. R.G. Geen and E.I. Donnerstein, vol. 1, 41–74. London/New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, B. 1998. Threatening Revisited. Forensic Linguistics 5 (2): 159–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabriel, Y. 1998. An Introduction to the Social Psychology of Insults in Organizations. Human Relations 51 (11): 1329–1354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, R.W. 1999. Intentions in the Experience of Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. 1967. Interactional Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behavior. Allen Lane: The Penguin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grainger, K. 2011. ‘First Order’ and ‘Second Order’ Politeness: Institutional and Intercultural Contexts. In Discursive Approaches to Politeness, ed. LPRG, vol. 8, 167–188. Berlin: De Gruyter Moulton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwell, J., and H.A. Dengerink. 1973. The Role of Perceived Versus Actual Attack in Human Physical Aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 26: 66–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grice, H.P. 1975. Logic and Conversation. In Syntax and Semantics, Speech Acts, ed. P. Cole and J.L. Morgan, vol. 3, 41–58. London/New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardaker, C. 2010. Trolling in Asynchronous Computer-mediated Communication: From User Discussions to Academic Definitions. Journal of Politeness Research Language, Behaviour, Culture 6 (2): 215–242. doi:10.1515/jplr.2010.011.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2013. “Uh….Not to Be Nitpicky,,,,,but…the Past Tense of Drag Is Dragged, Not Drug.”: An Overview of Trolling Strategies. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 1 (1): 57–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2015. “I Refuse to Respond to This Obvious Troll.”: An Overview of Responses to (Perceived) Trolling. Corpora 10 (2): 201–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, S. 2001. Being Politically Impolite: Extending Politeness Theory to Adversarial Political Discourse. Discourse & Society 12 (4): 451–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haugh, M. 2004. Revisiting the Conceptualisation of Politeness in English and Japanese. Multilingua 23 (1–2): 85–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2007a. The Co-constitution of Politeness Implicature in Conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 39 (1): 84–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2007b. The Discursive Challenge to Politeness Research: An Interactional Alternative. Journal of Politeness Research: Language, Behaviour, Culture 3: 295–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2015. Impoliteness and Taking Offence in Initial Interactions. Journal of Pragmatics 86: 36–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haugh, M., and C. Hinze. 2003. A Metalinguistics Approach to Deconstructing the Concepts of ‘Face’ and ‘Politeness’ in Chinese, English and Japanese. Journal of Pragmatics 35: 1581–1611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herring, S.C., D. Stein, and T. Virtanen. 2013. Introduction to the Pragmatics of Computer-mediated Communication. In Pragmatics of Computer-Mediated Communication, ed. S.C. Herring, D. Stein, and T. Virtanen, 3–32. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jucker, A.H. 2013. Corpus Pragmatics. In Handbook of Pragmatics, ed. J.-O. Östman and J. Verschueren, 1–17. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kádár, D. 2013. Relational Rituals and Communication. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kienpointner, M. 1997. Varieties of Rudeness: Types and Functions of Impolite Utterances. Functions of Language 4 (2): 251–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2008. Impoliteness and Emotional Arguments. Journal of Politeness Research: Language, Behaviour, Culture 4 (2): 243–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleinke, S., and B. Bös. 2015. Intergroup Rudeness and the Metapragmatics of Its Negotiation in Online Discussion Fora. Pragmatics 25 (1): 47–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lachenicht, L.G. 1980. Aggravating Language: A Study of Abusive and Insulting Language. International Journal of Human Communication 13 (4): 607–688.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leech, G.N. 1983. Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2014. The Pragmatics of Politeness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Locher, M.A. 2006a. The Discursive Approach to Polite Behavior: A Response to Glick. Language in Society 35: 733–735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2006b. Polite Behaviour Within Relational Work. The Discursive Approach to Politeness. Multilingua 25 (3): 249–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Locher, M.A., and D. Bousfield. 2008. Introduction: Impoliteness and Power in Language. In Impoliteness in Language: Studies on Its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice, ed. D. Bousfield and M.A. Locher, 1–13. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Locher, M.A., and R.J. Watts. 2005. Politeness Theory and Relational Work. Journal of Politeness Research: Language, Behaviour, Culture 1 (1): 9–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorenzo-Dus, N., P. Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, and P. Bou-Franch. 2011. On-line Polylogues and Impoliteness: The Case of Postings Sent in Response to the Obama Reggaeton YouTube Video. Journal of Pragmatics 43 (10): 2578–2593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malle, B.F., and J. Knobe. 1997. The Folk Concept of Intentionality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 3: 101–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mills, S. 2003. Gender and Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, J. 2014. (Im)politeness During Prime Minister’s Questions in the U.K. Parliament. Pragmatics and Society 5 (1): 76–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson, T., and B. Griffin. 2015. Here Today but Not Gone Tomorrow: Incivility Affects After-Work and Next-Day Recovery. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology 20 (2): 218–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pavlidou, T. 1991. Cooperation and the Choice of Linguistic Means: Some Evidence from the Use of the Subjunctive in Modern Greek. Journal of Pragmatics 15: 11–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pizziconi, B. 2007. The Lexical Mapping of Politeness in British English and Japanese. Journal of Politeness Research: Language, Behaviour, Culture 3 (2): 207–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riskin, A., Erez, A., Foulk, T. A., Kugelman, A., Gover, A., Shoris, I., . . . Bamberger, P. A. 2015. The Impact of Rudeness on Medical Team Performance: A Randomized Trial. Pediatrics 136: 487–495.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romero-Trillo, J., ed. 2008. Pragmatics and Corpus Linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shum, W., and C. Lee. 2013. (Im)politeness and Disagreement in Two Hong Kong Internet Discussion Forums. Journal of Pragmatics 50 (1): 52–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinkeviciute, V. 2015. “There’s Definitely Gonna Be Some Serious Carnage in This House” or How to Be Genuinely Impolite in Big Brother UK. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 3 (2): 317–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, P., R.D. King, and T.L. Phillips. 2010. Incivility: The Rude Stranger in Everyday Life. London: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Spencer-Oatey, H.D.M., ed. 2001. Culturally Speaking: Managing Rapport Through Talk Across Cultures. 1st ed. London/New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———., ed. 2008. Culturally Speaking: Culture, Communication and Politeness Theory. 2nd ed. London/New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sperber, D., and D. Wilson. 1995. Relevance: Communication and Cognition. 2nd ed. Oxford/Cambridge: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. 2015a. Beyond Sarcasm: The Metalanguage and Structures of Mock Politeness. Journal of Pragmatics 87: 127–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2015b. Mock Politeness in English and Italian: A Corpus-Assisted Study of the Metalanguage of Sarcasm and Irony. Unpublished PhD thesis, Lancaster University, Lancaster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terkourafi, M. 2001. Politeness in Cypriot Greek: A Frame-Based Approach. Cambridge: University of Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2005. Pragmatic Correlates of Frequency of Use: The Case for a Notion of “Minimal Context”. In Reviewing Linguistic Thought: Converging Trends for the 21st Century, ed. S. Marmaridou, K. Nikiforidou, and E. Antonopoulou, 209–233. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2008. Towards a Unified Theory of Politeness, Impoliteness, and Rudeness. In Impoliteness in Language: Studies on Its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice, ed. D. Bousfield and M.A. Locher, 45–74. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2009. Politeness. In Key Ideas in Linguistics, ed. S. Chapman and C. Routledge, 157–161. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, J. 1986. The Dynamics of Discourse: A Pragmatic Analysis of Confrontational Interaction. Lancaster: Lancaster University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tracy, K. 2008. ‘Reasonable Hostility’: Situation-appropriate face-attack. Journal of Politeness Research: Language, Behaviour, Culture 4 (2): 169–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waters, S. 2012. “It’s Rude to VP”: The Cultural Semantics of Rudeness. Journal of Pragmatics 44 (9): 1051–1062.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watts, R.J. 2003. Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Willard, N.E. 2007. Cyberbullying and Cyberthreats: Responding to the Challenge of Online Social Aggression, Threats, and Distress. Champaign: Research Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK

    Jonathan Culpeper & Claire Hardaker

Authors
  1. Jonathan Culpeper
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Claire Hardaker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jonathan Culpeper .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Dept of Linguistics & English Language, Lancaster University, Lancaster, United Kingdom

    Jonathan Culpeper

  2. School of Languages and Cultures, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

    Michael Haugh

  3. Dept of Linguistics and Modern Languages, University of Huddersfield, Queensgate, United Kingdom

    Dániel Z. Kádár

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Culpeper, J., Hardaker, C. (2017). Impoliteness. In: Culpeper, J., Haugh, M., Kádár, D. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)politeness. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-37508-7_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-37508-7_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-37507-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-37508-7

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation