Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Resource Dependence Theory

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Palgrave Handbook of Inter-Organizational Relations in World Politics

Abstract

This chapter aims to make resource dependence theory (RDT) more accessible for scholars of international organizations. It first outlines RDT’s origins and evolution, introduces its core assumptions, and discusses the theory’s shortcomings. RDT is currently experiencing a phase of theory revival, refinement, and empirical application. Secondly the chapter explores whether RDT can be applied to international organizations and considers works by International Relations (IR) scholars who have employed a resource dependence perspective. Increasing empirical evidence indicates that RDT has the potential to improve our understanding of cooperation among international organizations. Open questions remain about RDT’s scope and its compatibility with other organizational and IR theories. The chapter concludes by suggesting several avenues for future research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Aldrich, H. E. (1976). Resource Dependence and Interorganizational Relations: Local Employment Services Offices and Social Services Sector Organizations. Administration & Society, 7(4), 419–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aldrich, H. E., & Pfeffer, J. (1976). Environments of Organizations. Annual Review of Sociology, 2, 79–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aldrich, H. E. (1979). Organizations and Environments. Englewood-Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aldrich, H. E., & Whetten, D. A. (1981). Organization-Sets, Action-Sets, and Networks: Making the Most of Simplicity. In P. C. Nystrom & W. H. Starbuck (Eds.), Handbook of Organizational Design (Vol. 1, pp. 385–408). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, M., & Coleman, L. (2005). Designing Police: Interpol and the Study of Change in International Organizations. International Studies Quarterly, 49(4), 593–619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, M., & Duvall, R. (Eds.) (2005). Power in Global Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, S. (2007). Why Cooperate? The Incentive to Supply Global Public Goods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J. (1991). Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benson, J. K. (1975). The Interorganizational Network as a Political Economy. Administrative Science Quarterly, 20(2), 229–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biermann, R. (2008). Towards a Theory of Inter-Organizational Networking. The Euro-Atlantic Security Institutions Interacting. The Review of International Organizations, 3(2), 151–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biermann, R. (2011). Inter-Organizational Relations: An Emerging Research Program. In B. Reinalda (Ed.), The Ashgate Research Companion to Non-State Actors (pp. 173–184). London: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biermann, R. (2014). NATO’s Troubled Relations with Partner Organizations. A Resource Dependence Explanation. In S. Mayer (Ed.), NATO’s Post-Cold Bureaucracy and the Changing Provision of Security (pp. 215–234). London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and Power in Social Life. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brass, D. J. (2002). Intraorganizational Power and Dependence. In J. A. C. Baum (Ed.), The Blackwell Companion to Organizations (pp. 138–157). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brechin, S. R., & Ness, G. D. (2013). Looking Back at the Gap: International Organizations as Organizations Twenty-Five Years Later. Journal of International Organization Studies, 4(2), 14–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brosig, M. (2011). Overlap and Interplay between International Organisations: Theories and Approaches. South African Journal of International Affairs, 18(2), 147–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brosig, M. (2015). Cooperative Peacekeeping in Africa: Exploring Regime Complexity. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casciaro, T., & Piskorski, M. J. (2005). Power Imbalance, Mutual Dependence, and Constraint Absorption: A Closer Look at Resource Dependence Theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(2), 167–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, K. S. (1977). Exchange and Power in Networks of Interorganizational Relations. The Sociological Quarterly, 18(1), 62–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, G. F., & Cobb, J. A. (2010). Resource Dependence Theory: Past and Future. In C. B. Schoonhoven & F. Dobbin (Eds.), Stanford’s Organization Theory Renaissance 1970–2000 (pp. 21–42). Bingley: Emerald Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dingwerth, K., Kerwer, D., & Nölke, A. (Eds.) (2009). Die Organisierte Welt. Internationale Beziehungen und Organisationsforschung. Baden-Baden: Nomos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowling, J., & Pfeffer, J. (1975). Organizational Legitimacy. Social Values and Organizational Behavior. The Pacific Sociological Review, 18(1), 122–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drees, J. M., & Heugens, P. P. (2013). Synthesizing and Extending Resource Dependence Theory: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Management, 20(10), 1–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, D. C. (2010). The Organizational Turn in International Organization Theory. Journal of International Organization Studies, 1(1), 11–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, R. M. (1962). Power-Dependence Relations. American Sociological Review, 27(1), 31–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, R. M. (1964). Power-Dependence Relations: Two Experiments. Sociometry, 27(3), 282–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, R. M. (1972a). Exchange Theory, Part I: A Psychological Basis for Social Exchange. In J. Berger, M. Zelditch Jr., & B. Anderson (Eds.), Sociological Theories in Progress (Vol. 2, pp. 38–57). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, R. M. (1972b). Exchange Theory, Part II: Exchange Relations and Network Structures. In J. Berger, M. Zelditch Jr., & B. Anderson (Eds.), Sociological Theories in Progress (Vol. 2, pp. 58–87). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzioni, A. (1960). New Directions in the Study of Organizations and Society. Social Research, 27(2), 223–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gargiulo, M. (1993). Two-Step Leverage: Managing Constraint in Organizational Politics. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38(1), 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galaskiewicz, J. (1985). Interorganizational Relations. Annual Review of Sociology, 11, 281–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gest, N., & Grigorescu, A. (2010). Interactions among Intergovernmental Organizations in the Anti-Corruption Realm. The Review of International Organizations, 5(1), 53–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481–510.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harsch, M. F. (2015). The Power of Dependence: NATO-UN Cooperation in Crisis Management. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hatch, M. J. (1997). Organization Theory. Modern, Symbolic, and Postmodern Perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heisbourg, F. (2000). European Defence. Making It Work, Chaillot Paper 42, Paris: EU Institute for Security Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillman, A. J., Withers, M. C., & Collins, B. J. (2009). Resource Dependence Theory: A Review. Journal of Management, 35(6), 1404–1427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huxham, C., & Beech, N. (2010). Inter-Organizational Power. In S. Cropper, M. Ebers, C. Huxham, & P. Smith Ring (Eds.), Oxford Handbook of Inter-Organizational Relations (pp. 555–579). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, D. (1974). Dependency and Vulnerability: An Exchange Approach to the Control of Organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 19(1), 45–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katila, R., Rosenberger, J. D., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (2008). Swimming with Sharks: Technology Ventures, Defense Mechanisms, and Corporate Relationships. Administrative Science Quarterly, 53(2), 295–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keohane, R. O., & Nye, J. S. (1977). Power and Interdependence: World Politics in Transition. Boston: Little Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khandwalla, R. N. (1981). Properties of Competing Organizations. In P. C. Nystrom & W. H. Starbuck (Eds.), Handbook of Organizational Design (Vol. 1, pp. 409–432). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koch, M. (2006). Processes of Autonomization in/of International Organizations? The Case of the World Trade Organization (WTO), Working Paper Series, Bielefeld: Institut für Weltgesellschaft.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, S., & White, P. E. (1961). Exchange as a Conceptual Framework for the Study of Interorganizational Relationships. Administrative Science Quarterly, 5(4), 583–601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liese, A. (2009). Die unterschiedlich starke Öffnung internationaler Organisationen gegenüber nichtstaatlichen Akteuren. Erklärungen der Institutionen- und Organisationstheorie. In K. Dingwerth, D. Kerwer, & A. Nölke (Eds.), Die Organisierte Welt. Internationale Beziehungen und Organisationsforschung (pp. 189–210). Baden-Baden: Nomos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liese, A. (2010). Explaining Varying Degrees of Openness in the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). In C. Jönsson & J. Tallberg (Eds.), Transnational Actors in Global Governance: Patterns, Explanations and Implications (pp. 88–108). Houndmills: Palgrave.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lipson, M. (2011). A Resource Dependence Model of Peace Operations Coordination, Paper presented at the 6th European Consortium for Political Research General Conference, Reykjavík, 25-27 August.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G. (1966). The Power of Power. In D. Easton (Ed.), Varieties of Political Theory (pp. 39–60). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayntz, R. (2009). Prolog. In K. Dingwerth, D. Kerwer, & A. Nölke (Eds.), Die Organisierte Welt. Internationale Beziehungen und Organisationsforschung (pp. 9–11). Baden-Baden: Nomos.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mizruchi, M. S., & Yoo, M. (2002). Interorganizational Power and Dependence. In J. A. C. Baum (Ed.), The Blackwell Companion to Organizations (pp. 599–620). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ness, G. D., & Brechin, S. R. (1988). Bridging the Gap: International Organizations as Organizations. International Organization, 42(2), 245–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, C. (1990). Determinants of Interorganizational Relationships: Integration and Future Directions. Academy of Management Review, 15(2), 241–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, C. (1991). Network Relations and Loss of Organizational Autonomy. Human Relations, 44(9), 943–961.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paris, R. (2009). Understanding the “Coordination Problem” in Postwar Statebuilding. In R. Paris & T. D. Sisk (Eds.), The Dilemmas of Statebuilding: Confronting the Contradictions of Postwar Peace Operations (pp. 53–78). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J. (2003). ‘Introduction to the Classic Edition’. In J. Pfeffer & G. R. Salancik (Eds.), The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective (pp. xi–xxix). Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2nd ed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1974). Organizational Decision Making as a Political Process: The Case of a University Budget. Administrative Science Quarterly, 19(2), 135–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (2003). The External Control of Organizations. A Resource Dependence Perspective. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2 online ed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Podolny, J. M. (1993). A Status-Based Model of Market Competition. American Journal of Sociology, 98(4), 829–872.

    Google Scholar 

  • Provan, K. G., Beyer, J. M., & Kruytbosch, C. (1980). Environmental Linkages and Power in Resource-Dependence Relations between Organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 25(2), 200–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salancik, G. R., & Pfeffer, J. (1974). The Bases and Use of Power in Organizational Decision Making: The Case of a University. Administrative Science Quarterly, 19(4), 453–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salancik, G. R., Pfeffer, J., & Kelley, J. P. (1978). A Contingency Model of Influence in Organizational Decision-Making. The Pacific Sociological Review, 21(2), 239–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schäferhoff, M. (2009). Kooperation oder Konkurrenz? Zur Kooperationsbereitschaft internationaler Verwaltungsstäbe in transnationalen öffentlich-privaten Partnerschaften. In K. Dingwerth, D. Kerwer, & A. Nölke (Eds.), Die Organisierte Welt. Internationale Beziehungen und Organisationsforschung (pp. 208–228). Baden-Baden: Nomos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W. R. (2003). Organizations. Rational, Natural, and Open Systems. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education, 5th ed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selznick, P. (1949). TVA and the Grass Roots: A Study in the Sociology of Formal Organization. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, J. D. (1967). Organizations in Action. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, J. D., & McEwen, W. J. (1958). Organizational Goals and Environment: Goal-Setting as an Interaction Process. American Sociological Review, 23(1), 23–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, D., & Barney, J. B. (1984). Perspectives in Organizations: Resource Dependence, Efficiency, and Population. Academy of Management Review, 9(3), 471–481.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Ven, A. H. (1976). On the Nature, Formation, and Maintenance of Relations Among Organizations. Academy of Management Review, 1(4), 24–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van de Ven, A. H., & Walker, G. (1984). The Dynamics of Interorganizational Coordination. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29(4), 598–621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuchtman, E., & Seashore, S. E. (1967). A System Resource Approach to Organizational Effectiveness. American Sociological Review, 32(6), 891–903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Friedrich Schiller University, Jena, Germany

    Rafael Biermann

  2. New York University Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates

    Michael Harsch

Authors
  1. Rafael Biermann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Michael Harsch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Jena, Germany

    Joachim A. Koops

  2. Vesalius College, Brussels, Belgium

    Rafael Biermann

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Biermann, R., Harsch, M. (2017). Resource Dependence Theory. In: Koops, J., Biermann, R. (eds) Palgrave Handbook of Inter-Organizational Relations in World Politics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-36039-7_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation