Developing Business Ethics in China pp 52-61 | Cite as
Economic Motivation and Its Relevance for Business Ethics
Abstract
The assessment of economic motivation, that is, the will to acquire and/or create wealth, has varied in accordance with the status of economic life within different social environments and during different historical periods. It was not until the rise of the market economy that economic motivation received significant recognition. In his analysis of the development of economic motivation in the history of Western civilization Max Scheler (1874–1928 points out that during ancient times and the Middle Ages, social class by birth and heredity determined the “privileges of political status, and only with such political status could one acquire wealth.” What could be acquired through different pursuits was determined by a standard in which “livelihood corresponded to status.” Political power and status absolutely determined and delimited the opportunities and pure activity space created by wealth (Scheler 1997, 10). In other words, political status with its corresponding morality was the highest standard for measuring all economic activities. The critical issue was social hierarchy, since only ‘livelihood that corresponded to status was lawful, moral, and normal. Economic motivation not subject to the limitations of status, however, was abnormal, immoral, and illegal. For this reason, the only way to rise above economic activities restricted by status was through the quest for treasure, turning worthless metals into gold, controlled pillages, and unlawful activities such as cheating people out of money.
Keywords
Business Ethic Chinese Version Political Status Private Benefit Neoclassical EconomistPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- Becker, G. S. 1976. The Economic Approach to Human Behavior. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Carlyle, T. 1988. On Heroes, Heroworship, and the Heroic in History. Boston: Houghton (1907). Chinese version. Shanghai: Joint Publishing Company Ltd.Google Scholar
- Confucius. 1992. The Analects (Lun yu). Translated by D. C. Lau; second edition. Hong Kong: Chinese University Press.Google Scholar
- Eatwell, J., M. Milgate, and P. Newman (eds.) 1987. The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics. Vol.2. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
- Fukuyama, F. 1995. Trust. The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
- —. The End of History and the Last Man. New York: Free Press (1992). Chinese version. Hohhot: Yuanfang Publishing House.Google Scholar
- Hobbes, T. 1985. Leviathan. New York: Cambridge University Press (1991). Chinese version. Beijing: Commercial Publishing House.Google Scholar
- Kiyosaki, R. T. and S. L. Lechter. 1997. Rich Dad, Poor Dad—What the Rich Teach Their Kids About Money—That the Poor and Middle Class Do Not! TechPress Inc.Google Scholar
- List, F. 1997. National System of Political Economy. New York: Garland (1974). Chinese version. Beijing: Commercial Publishing House.Google Scholar
- Philosophy in 18th Century France. 1963. Edited by the Teaching and Research Section of Foreign Philosophy History, Department of Philosophy, Beijing University. Beijing: Commercial Publishing House.Google Scholar
- Robson, J. M. 1996. Collected Works: John Stuart Mill—V. Essays on Economics and Society. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Scheler, M. 1997. Die Zukunft des Kapitalismus und andere Aufsätze (1979). Chinese version. Beijing: Joint Publishing Company.Google Scholar
- Sen, A. 1987. On Ethics and Economics. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
- — 1999. Development as Freedom. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
- Smith, Adam. 1976. An Inquiry Into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar