Representation is Futile?

American Anti-Collectivism and the Borg
  • Patrick Thaddeus Jackson
  • Daniel H. Nexon
Chapter

Abstract

The Star Trek franchise, which now includes ten films and five television series, has long provided scholars and fans with rich material for the analysis of politics in general, and United States foreign policy in particular. Many argue that specific episodes and/or elements of the Star Trek mythology—such as alien races and its historical timeline—endorse, critique, or reflect aspects of U.S. foreign policy. Such interpretations are far from uniform. There may be little doubt that the Klingon Empire in Star Trek: The Original Series (1966–1969) [ST:TOS]2 and such films as Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country (1991) corresponds to the Soviet Union and that the United Federation of Planets represents the United States, but is the Cardassian Empire of Star Trek: The Next Generation (1987–1994) [ST:TNG] and Star Trek: Deep Space Nine (1993–1999) [STDS9] Iraq, Nazi Germany, or does it lack a clear referent? For that matter, what does the Borg, the collectivist enemy par excellence and the most popular antagonist in the Star Trek universe, represent? Some suggest the Borg is Japan (Sardar 1999), others Communism (Yates 1997), and cases can be made, for example, for religious fanaticism, Rousseauian democracy, capitalism, forces opposed to multiculturalism, the fear of being consumed, and globalization.3

Keywords

Foreign Policy Computer Virus Liberal Ideal Television Series American Foreign Policy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. Bormanis, Andre (senior writer and consultant on several Star Trek series). 2002. Telephone interview, February 20.Google Scholar
  2. Boyd, Katrina. 1996. “Cyborgs in Utopia: The Problem of Radical Difference in Star Trek: The Next Generation,” in Taylor Harrison et al., eds., Enterprise Zones, Boulder, CO: Westview, pp. 95–113.Google Scholar
  3. Bush, George W. 2000. “Complete Text of Bush’s Inaugural Speech.” Online at http://detnews.com/2001/politics/0101/21/-178375.htm [July 10, 2002].
  4. Conslavo, Mia Lynn. 1999. The Best of Both Worlds? Examining Bodies, Technologies, Gender and the Borg of Star Trek, Ph.D. Dissertation, Graduate College, University of Iowa.Google Scholar
  5. “The Crisis in Kosovo.” 1999. “The Clinton Years, Nightline Transcripts,” March 24. Online at http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/clinton/etc/03241999.html [July 10, 2002].
  6. Ellington, Jane Elizabeth, and Joseph Critelli. 1983. “Analysis of a Modern Myth: The Star Trek Series,” Extrapolation 24(3): 241–50.Google Scholar
  7. Foner, Eric. 1999. The Story of American Freedom, New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  8. Fulton, Valerie. 1994. “An Other Frontier: Voyaging West with Mark Twain and Star Trek’s Imperial Subject,” Postmodern Culture 4(3). Online at http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/postmodern_culture/v004/4.3fulton_v.html [February 14, 2002].
  9. Harrison, Taylor. 1996. “Weaving the Cyborg Shroud: Mourning and Deferral in Star Trek: The Next Generation,” in Taylor Harrison et al., eds., Enterprise Zones, Boulder, CO: Westview, pp. 245–58.Google Scholar
  10. Hartz, Louis. 1955. The Liberal Tradition in America. New York: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
  11. Helford, Elyce Rae. 1996. “‘A Part of Myself No Man Should Ever See’: Reading Captain Kirk’s Multiple Masculinities,” in Taylor Harrison et al., eds., Enterprise Zones, Boulder, CO: Westview, pp. 10–32.Google Scholar
  12. Jameson, Frederic. 1992. The Geopolitical Aesthetic: Cinema and Space in the World System, Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Phillips, Kevin. 2001. “Get bin Laden,” Morning Edition, (12/11). Online at http://www.npr.org/ramfiles/me/20011211.me.04.ram [April 12, 2001].
  14. Poe, Stephen Edward. 1998. A Vision of the Future: Star Trek Voyager, New York: Pocket Books.Google Scholar
  15. Rabe, Stephen. 1998. Eisenhower and Latin America: the Foreign Policy of Anticommunism, Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
  16. Reagan, Ronald. 1982. “Speech to the House of Commons,” June 8. Online at http:odur.let.rug.nl/-usa/P/rr40/speeches/empire.htm [July 10, 2002].
  17. Reagan, Ronald. 1988. “Farewell address,” at “The Ronald Reagan Home Page: Speeches.” Online at http://reagan.webteamone.com/speeches/index.cfm [July 10, 2002].
  18. Reeves-Stevens, Judith, and Garfield Reeves-Stevens. 1998. Star Trek, the Next Generation: The Continuing Mission, New York: Pocket Books.Google Scholar
  19. Richards, Thomas. 1997. The Meaning of Star Trek, New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  20. Ringmar, Erik. 1996. Identity, Interests, and Action, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sardar, Ziauddin. 1999. “Science Friction,” New Statesman, 12(557): 35–37.Google Scholar
  22. Shimko, Keith. 1992. “Realism, Neorealism, and American Liberalism,” Review of Politics, 54 (Spring): 281–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Stephanson, Anders. 1995. Manifest Destiny, New York: Hill and Wang.Google Scholar
  24. Talbot, David. 2002. “Axis of Stupidity,” February 14, Salon.com. Online at http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2002/02/14/iraq/ [July 10, 2002].
  25. Weldes, Jutta. 1999. “Going Cultural: Star Trek, State Action, and Popular Culture,” Millennium, 28(1): 117–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Worland, Rick. 1994. “From the New Frontier to the Final Frontier: Star Trek from Kennedy to Gorbachev,” Film and History, 24(1–2): 19–35.Google Scholar
  27. Wright, Jim. N.D. “Unimatrix Zero, Part II.” Online at http://www.treknews.com/deltablues/unizero2.html#Analysis [April 26, 2002].
  28. Yates, Steven. 1997. “Star Trek and Collectivism: The Case of the Borg,” The Freeman, 47(4): 200–2.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Jutta Weldes 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Patrick Thaddeus Jackson
  • Daniel H. Nexon

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations