Reaching Beyond Geometry—The Privateness of Private Universities

  • Voldemar Tomusk
Part of the Issues in Higher Education book series (IHIGHER)

Abstract

On the most general level one can distinguish between two groups of higher education commentators in Eastern Europe. First, there are those who declare that the necessary reforms have been successfully completed. From this perspective, East European countries have amended their higher education legislation, transformed the structures of higher education systems, and reformed study programs. The conclusion is that with all this being accomplished, the degrees awarded by East European higher education institutions should be fully recognized internationally for academic, as well as professional purposes, and that the countries themselves should be admitted into the EU. Second, there are those who say that there has never been much need for reform because East European higher education has always been excellent, perhaps the very best of all. The conclusion, however, remains the same as in the first instance.

Keywords

High Education High Education Institution High Education System Reform Initiative Private High Education 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 2.
    J. Baudrillard, The Illusion of the End,Cambridge: Polity Press, 1994.Google Scholar
  2. 3.
    R. Dahrendorf, Universities After Communism: The Hannah Arendt Prize and the Reform of Higher Education in East Central Europe,Hamburg: Edition Körber-Stiftung, 2000.Google Scholar
  3. 5.
    B.R. Clark, The Higher Education System: Academic Organization in Cross-National Perspective,University of California Press, 1983.Google Scholar
  4. 6.
    A. Watson, Legal Transplants: An Approach to Comparative Law,Second edition, Athens and London: The University of Georgia Press, 1993.Google Scholar
  5. 7.
    M. Matthews, Education in the Soviet Union: Policies and Institutions Since Stalin,London: George Alen and Unwin, 1982.Google Scholar
  6. 8.
    V. Tomusk, “Recent Developments in Estonian Higher Education: Emergence of the Binary Division from the Point of View of Staff Development,” Minerva,34, 3 (1996), pp. 279–289.Google Scholar
  7. 9.
    P. Darvas, Institutional Innovations in Higher Education in Central Europe: Agenda for Research and Cooperation,Vienna: Institute for Human Sciences, 1996.Google Scholar
  8. 10.
    J. Baudrillard, Simulacres et Simulation,Paris: Galilée, 1981.Google Scholar
  9. 11.
    H. Winkler, “Funding of Higher Education in Germany,” in P. Hare (Ed.), Structure and Financing of Higher Education in Russia, Ukraine and the EU,London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers, 1997.Google Scholar
  10. 12.
    D. Levy, Higher Education and the State in Latin America: Private Challenges to Public Dominance,Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1986.Google Scholar
  11. 13.
    T. Leary, Interpersonal Diagnosis of Personality,New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1957.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Voldemar Tomusk 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Voldemar Tomusk

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations