The Regional Organizations of the Asia-Pacific pp 117-147 | Cite as
The Nature of Change
Chapter
Abstract
Earlier chapters of this volume have established that the ADB, ASEAN, APEC and the ARF have all experienced change. This chapter examines how change has occurred, or, in other words, what sort of change has been experienced by each of these Asia-Pacific regional institutions. In what follows I make use of an analytical framework concerning the nature of change imported from evolutionary biology to the social sciences to explore the types of change undergone by the regional organizations of the Asia-Pacific.
Keywords
Institutional Change Regional Organization Foreign Minister Incremental Model Eastern Economic Review
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
- 1.For example, Robert O. Keohane, After Hegemony, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
- Robert Axelrod and Robert O. Keohane, ‘Achieving Cooperation Under Anarchy: Strategies and Institutions’, World Politics, Vol. 38, No. 1, October 1985, pp. 226–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.Arthur A. Stein, ‘Coordination and Collaboration: Regimes in an Anarchic World’, International Organization, Vol. 36, No. 2, spring 1982, pp. 299–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lisa L. Martin, ‘Interests, Power, and Multilateralism’, International Organization, Vol. 46, No. 4, 1992, pp. 765–792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.Douglass C. North, Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990, to regional organizations.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.George Modelski and Kazimierz Poznanski, ‘Evolutionary Paradigms in the Social Sciences’, International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 40, 1996, pp. 315–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Stephen Jay Gould and Niles Eldridge, ‘Punctuated Equilibria: The Tempo and Mode of Evolution Reconsidered’, Paleobiology, Vol. 3, 1977.Google Scholar
- 6.Stephen D. Krasner, ‘Approaches to the State: Alternative Conceptions and Historical Dynamics’, Comparative Politics, January 1984, pp. 223–46.Google Scholar
- 8.Charles E. Lindblom, ‘The Science of Muddling Through’, Douglass C. North, Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance, Cambridge: Cambridge University press, 1990.Google Scholar
- 9.James G. March and Johan Olsen, ‘The Institutional Dynamics of International Political Orders’, International Organization, Vol. 52, No. 4, Autumn 1998, p. 964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Jürgen Habermas, Legitimation Crisis, Cambridge: Polity Press, 1992, p. 3.Google Scholar
- 11.Andrew P. Cortell and Susan Peterson, ‘Altered States: Explaining Domestic Institutional Change’, British Journal of Political Science, Vol. 29, 1999, p. 182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Other models of episodic change as applied to regional organizations include Dorette Corby, ‘Dialectical Functionalism: Stagnation as a Booster of European Integration’, International Organization, Vol. 42, No. 2, Spring 1995, pp. 253–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Andrew Moravcsik, ‘Negotiating the Single European Act’, International Organization, Vol. 45, No. 1, Winter 1991, pp. 19–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Michael Antolik, ASEAN and the Diplomacy of Accommodation, Armonck, NY: M.E. Sharpe, 1990, p. 10.Google Scholar
- 16.Desmond Ball and Armitav Acharya (eds), The Next Stage: Preventive Diplomacy and Security Cooperation in the Asia-Pacific Region, Canberra Papers on Strategy and Defence No. 131, Canberra: Australian National University, 1999.Google Scholar
- 17.Arnfinn Jorgensen-Dahl, Regional Organization and Order in South-East Asia, Basingstoke: Macmillan — now Palgrave Macmillan, 1982, pp. 52–4Google Scholar
- 18.Ross Garnaut, ‘APEC Ideas and Reality: History and Prospects’, paper presented to the 25th Pacific Trade and Development Conference, Osaka, 16–18 July 1999.Google Scholar
- 19.Yoichi Funabashi, Asia-Pacific Fusion, Washington: Institute for International Economics, 1996, p. 77.Google Scholar
- 21.Nihal Kappagoda, The Asian Development Bank, London: Intermediate Technology Publications, 1995, pp. 136–8.Google Scholar
- 23.Manuel F. Montes and Francisco A. Magno, ‘Trade and Environmental Diplomacy: Strategic Options for ASEAN’, Pacific Affairs, Vol. 70, Fall 1997, p. 361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.Susumu Awanohara, ‘Platitudes, Pious Hopes and Mediocrity’, Far Eastern Economic Review, 15 March 1984.Google Scholar
- 26.Amitav Acharya, ‘The Association of Southeast Asian Nations: “Security Community” or “Defence Community”?’, Pacific Affairs, Vol. 64, Summer 1991, p. 166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 27.David B.H. Denoon and Evelyn Colbert, ‘Challenges for the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN)’, Pacific Affairs, Vol. 71, No. 4, Winter 1998/99, p. 512.Google Scholar
- 30.Amos Tversky and Daniel Kahneman, ‘Advances in Prospect Theory: Cumulative Representation of Uncertainty’, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Vol. 5, 1992, p. 278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 31.Donald E. Weatherbee, ‘The Philippines and ASEAN: Options for Aquino’, Asian Survey, Vol. 27, December 1987, p. 1226.Google Scholar
- 32.Rodney Tasker and Rodney Hiebert, ‘Dysfunctional Family’, Far Eastern Economic Review, 23 July 1998.Google Scholar
- 33.Leszek Buszynski, ‘The Philippines, ASEAN and the Future of the American Bases’, The World Today, Vol. 44, May 1988, p. 84.Google Scholar
- 34.Nayan Chanda and Shada Islam, ‘In the Bunker: Southeast Asian Foreign Ministers are Discomfited by a New Take on an Old Principle’, Far Eastern Economic Review, Vol. 161, No. 32, 6 August 1998.Google Scholar
- 35.Dick Wilson, A Bank for Half the World, Manila: ADB, 1987, p. 57.Google Scholar
- 36.Antolik, ASEAN and the Diplomacy of Accommodation, p. 48, adds the two latter events to the unsettling period of 1975.Google Scholar
- 38.Amado Castro, ‘ASEAN Economic Cooperation’, in Alison Broinowski (ed.), Understanding ASEAN, London: Macmillan, 1982.Google Scholar
- 39.Mely Caballero-Anthony, ‘Mechanisms of Dispute Settlement: The ASEAN Experience’, Contemporary Southeast Asia, Vol. 20, No. 1, April 1998, pp. 38–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 41.Armitav Acharya, ‘A New Regional Order in South-East Asia: ASEAN in the Post-Cold War Era’, Adelphi Paper No. 279, London, Brassey’s, 1993, p. 75.Google Scholar
- 44.Michael Leifer, ‘The ASEAN Regional Forum: Extending ASEAN’s Model for Regional Security’, Adelphi Paper No. 302, London: Brassey’s, 1996.Google Scholar
- 45.Shalendra D Sharma, ‘Asia’s Economic Crisis and the IMF’, Survival, Vol. 40, No. 2, Summer 1998, pp. 27–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 47.Michael Wesley, ‘The Asian Crisis and the Adequacy of Regional Institutions’, Contemporary Southeast Asia, Vol. 21, No. 1, 1999, pp. 54–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 48.APEC Leaders’ Declaration, ‘Connecting the APEC Community’, Vancouver, 25 November 1997.Google Scholar
- 50.Ross Garnaut, ‘APEC Ideas and Reality: History and Prospects’, paper presented at the 25th Pacific Trade and Development Conference, Osaka, 16–18 July 1999.Google Scholar
- 51.Salil Tripathi, ‘Nothing Doing’, Far Eastern Economic Review, 17 September 1998, p. 45.Google Scholar
- 52.Donald K. Emmerson, ‘ASEAN as an International Regime’, Journal of International Affairs, Vol. 41, Summer/Fall 1987, pp. 1–16.Google Scholar
- 55.Paul Keating, Engagement: Australia Faces the Asia-Pacific, Sydney: Pan Macmillan, 2000, pp. 84–94.Google Scholar
- 57.Peter Lloyd, ‘APEC and Trade Liberalisation’, paper presented to the Third Annual Conference on International Trade Education and Research: Globalisation and the Australian Economy, Melbourne: 7–8 December 1998.Google Scholar
- 58.Louise Fawcett and Andrew Hurrell (eds), Regionalism in World Politics, Oxford: Oxfrod University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Copyright information
© Michael Wesley 2003