Technology and History in Capitalism: Marxian and Neo-Schumpeterian Perspectives

  • Tony Smith
Chapter

Abstract

The equilibrium models of neoclassical economics fail to account adequately for one of the most striking facts of capitalism, its unprecedented technological dynamism. Extrapolating from Schumpeter’s notion of ‘creative destruction’, contemporary neo-Schumpeterian economists have formulated a devastating critique of the neoclassical theory of technological change.2 Their position can be provisionally defined in terms of the following six theses:

  • technological change is endogenous to capitalism;

  • science tends to become increasingly central to production;

  • ‘learning by doing’ is of fundamental importance in the innovation process;

  • technological change cannot be adequately comprehended in abstraction from the institutional context in which it occurs, including the organizational structures of firms and the technology policies of states;

  • capitalism is characterized by radical uncertainty and disequilibrium tendencies due to technological change; and

  • different technologies and forms of social organization play leading roles in different periods of capitalist development.3

Keywords

Technological Change Labour Relation Capital Form Knowledge Worker Capitalist Development 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adler, Paul (1990), ‘Marx, machines, and skill’, Technology and Culture, 31/4: 780–812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Appelbaum, Eileen and Rosemary Batt (1994), The New American Workplace: Transforming Work Systems in the United States (Ithaca, NY: ILR Press).Google Scholar
  3. Archibugi, Daniele and Jonathan Michie (eds) (1997) Technology, Globalisation and Economic Performance (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
  4. Arthur Christopher (2002), Capital, competition and many capitals, in M. Campbell and G. Reuten (eds): 128–48.Google Scholar
  5. — and Geert Reuten (eds) (1998), The Circulation of Capital: Essays on Volume II of Marx’s ‘Capital’ (New York: St Martin’s Press).Google Scholar
  6. Bellofiore, Riccardo (ed.) (1999), Global Money, Capital Restructuring and the Changing Patterns of Labour (Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar).Google Scholar
  7. — (1985a) ‘Marx after Schumpeter’, Capital and Class, 24: 60–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. — (1985 b) ‘Money and development in Schumpeter’, Review of Radical Political Economy, 17/1–2: 21–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Braverman, Harry (1974), Labor and Monopoly Capital (New York: Monthly Review Press).Google Scholar
  10. Brenner, Robert (2002), The Boom and the Bubble: The US in the World Economy (New York: Verso).Google Scholar
  11. Burkett, Paul (1999), Marx and Nature: A Red and Green Perspective (New York: Palgrave).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. — and Martin Hart-Landsberg (2001), Crisis and recovery in East Asia: the limits of capitalist development, Historical Materialism, 8: 3–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Campbell, Martha and Geert Reuten (2002), The Culmination of Capital: Essays on Volume III of Marx’s Capital (Basingstoke/New York: Palgrave).Google Scholar
  14. Carlson, W. Bernard (2000), Invention and evolution: the case of Edison’s sketches of the telephone, in J. Ziman (ed.): 137–58.Google Scholar
  15. Constant, Edward (2000), Recursive practice and the evolution of technological knowledge, in J. Ziman (ed.): 219–33Google Scholar
  16. Coombs, Rod, Saviotti, Paolo and Vivien Walsh (1987), Economics and Technological Change, (London: Macmillan).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Coricelli, Fabrizio and Giovanni Dosi, (1988), Coordination and order in economic change and the interpretative power of economic theory, in G. Dosi et al. (eds): 124–47.Google Scholar
  18. David, Paul (2000), Path dependence and varieties of learning in the evolution of technological practices, in J. Ziman (ed.): 118–34.Google Scholar
  19. Dosi, Giovanni (1988), The nature of the innovative process, in Dosi et al. (eds): 221–38.Google Scholar
  20. — Freedman, Christopher, Nelson, Richard, Silverberg, Gerald and Luc Soete (eds) (1988), Technical Change and Economic Theory (New York: Pinter Publishers).Google Scholar
  21. — Teece, David and Josef Chytry (1998), Technology, Organisation, and Competitiveness: Perspectives on Industrial and Corporate Change (New York: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. The Economist (2002), Patently absurd, 23 June: 40–2.Google Scholar
  23. Fraser, Jill (2001), White-Collar Sweatshop: The Deterioration of Work and Its Rewards in Corporate America (New York: W.W. Norton).Google Scholar
  24. Freeman, Christopher (1988), Japan: a new National System of Innovation?, in G. Dosi et al. (eds): 330–49.Google Scholar
  25. — (1992), The Economics of Hope (London: Pinter).Google Scholar
  26. — (1997), The ‘National System of Innovation’ in historical perspective, in D. Archibugi and J. Michie (eds): 24–49.Google Scholar
  27. Freeman, Chris and Francisco Louçã (2001), As Time Goes By: From the Industrial Revolutions to the Information Revolution (New York: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
  28. Freeman, Christopher and Luc Soete (1999), The Economics of Industrial Innovation (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press).Google Scholar
  29. Harvey, David (1996), Justice, Nature and the Geography of Difference (Malden: Blackwell).Google Scholar
  30. Landes, David (1999), The Wealth and Poverty of Nations (New York: W.W. Norton).Google Scholar
  31. Lundvall, Bengt-Ake (1988), Innovation as an interactive process: from user-producer interaction to the National System of Innovation’, in G. Dosi et al. (eds): 349–69.Google Scholar
  32. Mandel, Ernest (1975), Late Capitalism (London: New Left Books).Google Scholar
  33. Mansfield, Edward, John Rapoport, Anthony Romeo, Samuel Wagner and George Beardsley (1967), Social and private rates of return from industrial innovations, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 41: 221–40.Google Scholar
  34. Marx, Karl (1867), Capital: Volume I (trans. Ben Fowkes) (New York: Penguin, 1976).Google Scholar
  35. Metcalfe, Stan (1997), Technology systems and technology policy in an evolutionary framework, in D. Archibugi and J. Michie (eds): 268–96.Google Scholar
  36. Mokyr, Joel (2000), Evolutionary phenomena in technological change, in J. Ziman (ed.): 52–65.Google Scholar
  37. Moseley, Fred (2002), Hostile brothers: Marx’s theory of the distribution of surplus-value in Volume III of Capital, in M. Campbell and G. Reuten (eds): 65–101.Google Scholar
  38. Murray, Patrick (1998), Beyond the ‘commerce and industry’ picture of capital, in C. Arthur and G. Reuten (eds): 33–66.Google Scholar
  39. National Science Board (2000), Science and Engineering Indicators, 1996, NSB 96–21, (Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office).Google Scholar
  40. Nelson, Richard (ed.) (1993), National Innovation Systems (New York: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
  41. — (1995), Recent evolutionary theorising about economic change, Journal of Economic Literature, 32/1: 48–90.Google Scholar
  42. Parker, Mike (1999), Management-by-stress and skilled work: the US case, in Riccardo Bellofiore (ed.): 125–40.Google Scholar
  43. — and Jane Slaughter (1994), Working Smart: A Union Guide to Participation Programs and Reengineering (Detroit: Labor Notes).Google Scholar
  44. Perelman, Michael (1998), Class Warfare in the Information Age (New York: St Martin’s Press).Google Scholar
  45. Reuten, Geert (1991), Accumulation of capital and the foundation of the tendency of the rate of profit to fall, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 15/1: 79–93.Google Scholar
  46. Richta, Radovan (1968), Civilization at the Crossroads: Social and Human Implications of the Scientific and Technological Revolution (Prague: International Arts and Sciences Press).Google Scholar
  47. Robinson, William and Jerry Harris (2000), Towards a global ruling class: globalization and the transnational capitalist class’, Science and Society, 64/1: 11–54.Google Scholar
  48. Sassen, Saskia (1998), Globalization and Its Discontents: Essays on the New Mobility of People and Money (New York: The New Press).Google Scholar
  49. Saviotti, P. Paolo and Stan Metcalfe (eds) (1991), Evolutionary Theories of Economic and Technological Change (London: Harwood).Google Scholar
  50. Schrader, Steven (1991), Informal transfer between firms: cooperation through information trading, Research Policy, 20: 153–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Schumpeter, Joseph (1934), The Theory of Economic Development (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
  52. — (1947), Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy (London: George Allen & Unwin).Google Scholar
  53. Schweickart, David (1993), Against Capitalism (New York: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
  54. Silverberg, Gerald (1988), ‘Modeling economic dynamics and technical change, in G. Dosi et al. (eds): 531–60.Google Scholar
  55. Singer, Peter (2002), Rx for reform, Foreign Policy, May/June, 76–7.Google Scholar
  56. Smith, Tony (1997), A critical comparison of the Neo-classical and Marxian theories of technical change, Historical Materialism, 1: 113–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. — (1998), The capital/consumer relation in lean production: the continued relevance of Volume Two of Capital, in C. Arthur and G. Reuten (eds): 149–73.Google Scholar
  58. — (2000a), Technology and Capital in the Age of Lean Production: A Marxian Critique of the ‘New Economy’ (Albany, NY: State University of New York Press).Google Scholar
  59. — (2000b), Brenner and crisis theory: issues in systematic and historical dialectics, Historical Materialism, 5: 145–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. — (2002), Surplus profits from innovation: a missing level in Capital III?, in M. Campbell and G. Reuten (eds): 67–94.Google Scholar
  61. Storper, Michael and R. Walker 1989), The Capitalist Imperative: Territory, Technology, and Industrial Growth (New York: Basil Blackwell).Google Scholar
  62. Toussaint, Eric (1999), Your Money or Your Life! The Tyranny of Global Finance (London: Pluto).Google Scholar
  63. UNDP (United Nations Development Program) (2000), Human Rights and Human Development (New York: UNDP).Google Scholar
  64. Went, Robert (2000), Globalization: Neoliberal Challenge, Radical Responses (London: Pluto).Google Scholar
  65. Wresch, William (1996), Disconnected: Haves and Have-nots in the Information Age (New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press).Google Scholar
  66. Ziman, John (ed.) (2000), Technological Innovation as an Evolutionary Process (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tony Smith

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations