The Impossible Constellation: Practice as Research as a Viable Alternative
This chapter draws attention to the features, values and debates of Practice as Research, arguingfor its approaches, methods and outputs to be considered as equivalent to those used by more traditional humanities scholars, i.e. the ‘academic book’. Indeed, it asks us to rethink our fetishisation of the physical book artefact as the pre-eminent model of publication in academic terms, and suggests we explore and support the development of other forms that might be more relevant to the digital age, and that attempt to break down the walls between theory and practice. It ends with a focus on the video essay form, which has the potential to reshape the subjects of Media and Film Studies in particular.
Keywordsfetishisation of text non-textual research outputs Practice as Research theory and practice video essay
- 3.R. Nelson (ed.) (2013) Practice as Research in the Arts: Principles, Protocols, Pedagogies, Resistances ( Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan ), p. 8.Google Scholar
- 7.G. Sullivan (2009) Art Practice as Research: Inquiry in Visual Arts, 2nd edn ( London: Sage), p. xx.Google Scholar
- 8.H. Richter (1992) ‘The Film Essay: A New Form of Documentary Film’, in Christa Blümlinger and Constatin Wuldd (eds), Schreiben Bilder Sprechen: Texte zum essayistischen Film (Wien: Sonderzahl), pp. 195–98. Translation by Richard Langston.Google Scholar
- 16.J. Bresland (2010) ‘On the Origin of the Video Essay’, TriQuarterly 9(1), http://www.northwestern.edu/newscenter/stories/2013/07/the-video-essaycelebrating-an-exciting-new-literary-form.html#sthash.BpuwQbrG.dpuf, accessed 15 August 2015.Google Scholar