Advertisement

Necessary but Not Automatic: How Europe Learned to Integrate

  • N. Piers Ludlow
Chapter
  • 613 Downloads

Abstract

With over 60 years of history behind it, the process of regional integration in Europe has lasted longer, and gone further, than that seen in any other part of the world. The instinct to look to the European example as a case study of integration, from which other regions might derive both positive and negative lessons, is therefore both strong and comprehensible. But any attempt to draw hard and fast lessons from the European story, or to assume any automatic parallels between the pattern of development observed and that likely to occur elsewhere, would be unwise.

Keywords

European Union Trade Liberalization Regional Integration Custom Union European Economic Community 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    Derek Benjamin Heater, The Idea of European Unity (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1992);Google Scholar
  2. Élisabeth Du Réau, L’Idée d’Europe au XXe Siècle: Des Mythes aux Réalités (Paris: Éditions Complexe, 2008).Google Scholar
  3. 2.
    Edward Gibbon, The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, ed. H. R. Trevor-Roper (London: Sadler and Brown, 1963).Google Scholar
  4. 3.
    Carl Strickwerda, “The Troubled Origins of European Economic Integration: International Iron and Steel and Labor Migration in the Era of World War I,” American Historical Review 98, no. 4 (1993), 1106–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 4.
    John Maynard Keynes, The Economic Consequences of the Peace (London: Macmillan, 1920).Google Scholar
  6. 5.
    Éric Bussière, “Premiers schémas européens et économie internationale durant l’entre-deux-guerres,” Relations Internationales 123, no. 3 (2005), 51–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 6.
    See, for example, the chapters collected in Wolfram Kaiser and Antonio Varsori (eds.), European Union History: Themes and Debates (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010).Google Scholar
  8. 7.
    For an example of such an early account, see Walter Lipgens, Die Anfänge der Europäischen Einigungspolitik, 1945–1950 (Stuttgart: Klett, 1977).Google Scholar
  9. 8.
    Alan S. Milward, The European Rescue of the Nation-State, 2nd ed. (London: Routledge, 2000).Google Scholar
  10. 9.
    Geir Lundestad, “Empire” by Integration: The United States and European Integration, 1945–1997 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
  11. 10.
    Michael Charlton, The Price of Victory (London: British Broadcasting Corporation, 1985), p. 69.Google Scholar
  12. 11.
    Josef Becker and Franz Knipping (eds.), Power in Europe? Great Britain, France, Italy, and Germany in a Postwar World, 1945–1950 (Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1986);Google Scholar
  13. Ennio Di Nolfo (ed.), Power in Europe? II: Great Britain, France, Germany, and Italy, and the Origins of the EEC, 1952–1957 (Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1992).Google Scholar
  14. 12.
    Clemens A. Wurm, Western Europe and Germany: The Beginnings of European Integration, 1945–1960 (Oxford: Berg Publishers, 1995);Google Scholar
  15. Antonio Varsori (ed.), La Politica Estera Italiana nel Secondo Dopoguerra (1953–1957) (Milan: LED, 1993).Google Scholar
  16. 13.
    Raymond Poidevin, Robert Schuman: Homme d’État, 1886–1963 (Paris: Imprimerie Nationale, 1986).Google Scholar
  17. 14.
    See also William I. Hitchcock, France Restored: Cold War Diplomacy and the Quest for Leadership in Europe, 1944–1954 (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1998).Google Scholar
  18. 15.
    Gilbert Noël, France, Allemagne et «Europe Verte» (Berne: Peter Lang, 1995).Google Scholar
  19. 16.
    François Duchêne, Jean Monnet: The First Statesman of Interdependence (New York: Norton, 1994).Google Scholar
  20. 17.
    Alan S. Milward, The Reconstruction of Western Europe, 1945–1951 (London: Methuen, 1984).Google Scholar
  21. 18.
    Klaus Schwabe (ed.), Die Anfänge des Schuman-Plans, 1950/51: Beiträge des Kolloquiums in Aachen, 28.–30. Mai 1986 (Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, 1988).Google Scholar
  22. 19.
    Enrico Serra (ed.), Il Rilancio dell’Europa e i trattati di Roma: Actes du colloque de Rome, 25–28 Mars 1987 (Bruxelles: Bruylant, 1989).Google Scholar
  23. 20.
    See discussion of the revised Pleven Plan in David A. Messenger, “Dividing Europe: The Cold War and European Integration,” in Desmond Dinan (ed.), Origins and Evolution of the European Union (New York: Oxford University Press, 2006), pp. 43–5.Google Scholar
  24. 21.
    Barbara Böttcher and Eva Schmithausen, “A Future in the EU? Reconciling the ‘Brexit’ Debate with a More Modern EU,” EU Monitor, Deutsche Bank Research, September 15, 2014, http://www.dbresearch.in/PROD/DBR_INTERNET_EN-PROD/PROD0000000000341324.pdf (accessed October 24, 2014).Google Scholar
  25. 24.
    Emmanuel Mourlon-Druol, “Filling the EEC Leadership Vacuum? The Creation of the European Council in 1974,” Cold War History 10, no. 3 (2010), 315–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 25.
    The process of creating a customs union in Europe was begun in 1958, and tariffs and other barriers to trade were abolished in progressive stages, culminating in 1968. See John Pinder and Simon Usherwood, The European Union: A Very Short Introduction (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007), pp. 18, 66.Google Scholar
  27. 26.
    For some of the difficulties encountered in Southern Africa, see Chris Saunders, Gwinyayi A. Dzinesa, and Dawn Nagar (eds.), Region-Building in Southern Africa: Progress, Problems, and Prospects (London: Zed Books, 2012).Google Scholar
  28. 27.
    Ludger Kühnhardt, Crises in European Integration: Challenge and Response, 1945–2005 (New York: Berghahn, 2009).Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Like the many specialist bodies in the fields of transport, postal communications, and other international services. See Kiran Klaus Patel, “Provincialising European Union: Co-operation and Integration in Europe in a Historical Perspective,” Contemporary European History 22, no. 4 (2013), 649–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    N. Piers Ludlow, “The End of Symbiosis: The Nixon Era and the Collapse of Comfortable Co-existence between European and Atlantic Integration,” in Giles Scott-Smith and Valérie Aubourg (eds.), Atlantic, Euratlantic, or Europe-America? (Paris: Soleb, 2011), pp. 60–81.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    The extent of the EU’s backing can be gauged from Daniel Bach, “The AU and the EU,” in John Akokpari, Angela Ndinga-Muvumba, and Timothy Murithi (eds.), The African Union and Its Institutions (Auckland Park: Fanele, 2009), pp. 355–70.Google Scholar
  32. See also the chapters collected in Adekeye Adebajo and Kaye Whiteman (eds.), The EU and Africa: From Eurafrique to Afro-Europa (New York: Columbia University Press, 2012).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© N. Piers Ludlow 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • N. Piers Ludlow

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations