The Uncanny Muse of Creative Reading: On the New Cambridge Edition of Mrs. Dalloway
Chapter
Abstract
O’Hara notes Woolf’s inclusive gesture offering readers the democratic play of readings: whatever edition used, they can use their novel’s key elements. Author, reader, and characters participate in reformative play. Sublime crisis is the impetus for discovering the latent impression of the future residing in the past. Following a brief review of Hegel’s dialectical self-making O’Hara shows the symbolic “god-image” as nexus where community and individual converge. Uncanny experience of the confrontation between past, present, and future is social and personal, as a close reading of the woman in the opposite house, noticed by Clarissa when she processes Septimus’s suicide, demonstrates.
Keywords
British Edition Section Break Romantic Poet American Edition Latent Impression
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
- 1.Anne E. Fernald, ed. The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Virginia Woolf: Mrs. Dalloway (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2015).Google Scholar
- 2.See M. H. Abrams, “Structure and Style in the Greater Romantic Lyric,” in Harold Bloom, ed. Romanticism and Consciousness (New York: W.W. Norton and Company, 1970).Google Scholar
- 3.See Daniel T. O’Hara, Tragic Knowledge: Yeats’s Autobiography and Hermeneutics (New York: Columbia University Press, 1981). The term “god-image” is my own, though influenced by the work of Kenneth Burke, C. G. Jung, and Friedrich Nietzsche, about all of whom on this connection please see also my book: The Art of Reading as a Way of Life: On Nietzsche’s Truth (Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 2009). “God,” as I theorize it here, is an image, a term, for the highest energy state of maximally enhanced creative power, what Blake calls “The Human Form Divine” or “The Imagination.” It is why there is literature and why we read and read it.Google Scholar
- 5.See Julia Briggs, Virginia Woolf: An Inner Life (New York: Harcourt, 2005).Google Scholar
- 6.Sigmund Freud, “Screen Memories” in The Uncanny, trans. David McClintock, with an Introduction by Hugh Haughton (New York: Penguin, 2003), p. 20. For the most complete study of the phenomenon of the uncanny and its relationship to the psychological concept of Nachträglichkeit, that belated revisionary imagination of those earliest moments of trauma that never enter into consciousness, seeGoogle Scholar
- Nicholas Royle, The Uncanny (Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press, 2003). See also my “Freudian Psychoanalytic Criticism” in David H. Richter, ed. The Blackwell Companion to Literary Theory (Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, forthcoming).Google Scholar
- 7.For a thoroughly accessible discussion of this Lacanian model of the uncanny, see Jean-Michel Rabaté, The Cambridge Introduction to Literature and Psychoanalysis (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2014), chaps. 3 and 6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.For the best summary of this aspect in the novels, see Tina Barr, “Divine Politics: Virginia Woolf’s Journey to Eleusis in To the Lighthouse,” boundary 2, 20, 1 (Spring 1993), 125–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Copyright information
© Daniel T. O’Hara 2015