Utopia and the Public Sphere

  • Timothy Stanley
Chapter

Abstract

Although the question of religion did not feature prominently in Jürgen Habermas’s early political theory, his more recent work has continuously addressed the topic. For instance, in one of the few references to religion in his 1962 The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere, he noted the impact on the churches of the differentiation between the private sphere and public authority (Habermas 1989, 11–12).1 Historic processes of secularization ultimately privatized religious institutions and did not require further comment. However, as recently as a 2011 compendium on The Power of Religion in the Public Sphere, Habermas reiterated his more recent work on the subject, arguing that religious and secular citizens “both are involved in an interaction that is constitutive for a democratic process springing from the soil of civil society and developing through the informal communication networks of the public sphere” (Habermas 2011, 27). This later interest in religion is grounded in what one commentator in that same volume cited as the urgent need to integrate religious voices in the workings of public reason in order to avoid social disharmony and to thwart potential violence (Calhoun 2011, 127). However, this chapter argues that the hermeneutic procedures Habermas develops for the public sphere cannot bear the weight that his later understanding of religion demands of them.2 Such an insight validates Paul Ricoeur’s earlier argument that Habermas’s “depth hermeneutics” (Habermas 1971, 218, 226, 256) were themselves utopic in nature.

Keywords

Public Sphere Private Interest Public Reason Democratic Legitimacy Literal Interpretation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Works Cited

  1. Arendt, Hannah. 1958. The Human Condition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  2. Aristotle. 1995. Poetics. Loeb Classical Library. Translated by Stephen Halliwell. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Benedict XVI. 2006. “Faith, Reason and the University: Memories and Reflections.” Paper presented at the Meeting with the Representatives of Science at the University of Regensburg, Germany, September 9–14. Accessed July 22, 2013. http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/benedict_xvi/speeches/2006/september/documents/hf_ben-xvi_spe_20060912_university-regensburg_en.html.Google Scholar
  4. Bloch, Ernst. 1921 [1960]. Thomas Münzer als Theologe der Revolution. Berlin: Aufbau-Verlag.Google Scholar
  5. Butt, Riazat. 2008. “Archbishop Backs Sharia Law for British Muslims.” Guardian, February 7. Accessed July 22, 2013. http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2008/feb/07/religion.world.
  6. Calhoun, Craig. 2011. “Afterword: Religion’s Many Powers.” In The Power of Religion in the Public Sphere, edited by Judith Butler, Eduardo Mendieta, and Jonathan VanAn-twerpen, 118–34. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Derrida, Jacques. 2001. “Above All, No Journalists!” In Religion and Media, edited by Hentde Vries and Samuel Weber, 56–93. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. —. 2006. “For a Justice to Come: An Interview with Jacques Derrida.” In The Derrida-Habermas Reader, edited by Lasse Thomassen, 259–69. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  9. Fraser, Nancy. 1992. “Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing Democracy.” In Habermas and the Public Sphere, edited by Craig Calhoun, 109–42. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  10. Freud, Sigmund. 2010. The Interpretation of Dreams. Translated and edited by James Strachey. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  11. Gadamer, Hans-Georg. 1977. Philosophical Hermeneutics. Translated and edited by David E. Linge. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  12. —. 1988. Truth and Method. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
  13. Geertz, Clifford. 1973. The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  14. Habermas, Jürgen. 1971. Knowledge and Human Interests. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  15. —. 1989. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Translated by Thomas Burger with the assistance of Frederich Lawrence. London: Polity Press. (Original German edition: Jürgen Habermas. 1962. Strukturwandel Der Öffentlichkeit: Untersuchungen Zu Einer Kategorie Der Bürgerlichen Gesellscahft. Neuwied: H. Luchterhand.)Google Scholar
  16. —. 1992a. “Further Reflections on the Public Sphere.” In Habermas and the Public Sphere, edited by Craig Calhoun, 421–61. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  17. —. 1992b. “Concluding Remarks.” In Habermas and the Public Sphere, edited by Craig Calhoun, 462–80. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  18. —. 1992c. “Transcendence from Within, Transcendence in This World.” In Habermas, Modernity, and Public Theology, edited by Francis Schussler Fiorenza and Don Browning, 226–50. New York: Crossroad.Google Scholar
  19. —. 1998. The Inclusion of the Other: Studies in Political Theory. Translated and edited by Ciaran Cronin and Pablo De Greiff. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  20. —. 1999. “From Kant to Hegel and Back Again—The Move towards Detranscen-dentalization.” European Journal of Philosophy 7: 129–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. —. 2001a. The Postnational Constellation: Political Essays. Translated by Max Pensky. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  22. —. 2001b. “Faith and Knowledge: An Opening.” Speech accepting the Peace Prize of the German Publishers and Booksellers Association, Frankfurt, Germany, October 14. Accessed July 22, 2013. http://amsterdam.nettime.org/Lists-Archives/nettime-l-0111/msg00100.html.
  23. —. 2004. “Religious Tolerance—The Pacemaker for Cultural Rights.” Philosophy 79: 5–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. —. 2006. “Leveling the Genre Distinction between Philosophy and Literature.” In The Derrida-Habermas Reader, edited by Lasse Thomassen, 13–34. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  25. —. 2011. “‘The Political’: The Rational Meaning of a Questionable Inheritance of Political Theology.” In The Power of Religion in the Public Sphere, edited by Judith Butler, Eduardo Mendieta, and Jonathan VanAntwerpen, 15–34. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Habermas, Jürgen, Benedict XVI, and Florian Schuller. 2006. The Dialectics of Secularization: On Reason and Religion. San Francisco: Ignatius Press.Google Scholar
  27. Hegel, G. W. F. 1977. Phenomenology of Spirit. Translated by A. V. Miller. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  28. —. 1984. Lectures on the Philosophy of Religion. Translated and edited by Peter Crafts Hodgson. 3 vols. Vol. 1. Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  29. Jeanrond, Werner. 1994. Theological Hermeneutics: Development and Significance. London: SCM Press.Google Scholar
  30. Landshut, Siegfried. 1953. “Volkssouveranitat und öffentliche Meinung.” In Gegenwartsprobleme des internationalen Rechtes and der Rechtsphilosophie: Festschrift für Rudolf Laun zu seinem 70: Geburtstag, edited by D. S. Constantopoulos and H. Wehberg, 579–86. Hamburg: Girardet and Co.Google Scholar
  31. Lévi-Strauss, Claude. 2012. Tristes Tropiques. Translated by John Weightman and Doreen Weightman. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  32. Linge, David E. 1977. Editor’s Introduction to Philosophical Hermeneutics, by HansGeorg Gadamer, translated and edited by David E. Linge, xi–lviii. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  33. Marx, Karl. 1970. The German Ideology. London: Lawrence and Wishart.Google Scholar
  34. Meyer, William J. 1995. “Private Faith or Public Religion? An Assessment of Habermas’s Changing View of Religion.” Journal of Religion 75: 371–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ramadan, Tariq. 2004. Western Muslims and the Future of Islam. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Ricoeur, Paul. 1970. Freud and Philosophy: An Essay on Interpretation. Translated by Denis Savage. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  37. —. 1975. “The Task of the Political Educator.” In Paul Ricoeur: Political and Social Essays, 271–93. Athens: Ohio University Press.Google Scholar
  38. —. 1976. Interpretation Theory: Discourse and the Surplus of Meaning. Fort Worth: Texas Christian University Press.Google Scholar
  39. —. 1977. The Rule of Metaphor: Multidisciplinary Studies in the Creation of Meaning. Translated by Robert Czerny with Kathleen McLaughlin and John Costello. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  40. —. 1981. “L’Histoire comme Récit et comme Practique.” Espirit 6: 155–65.Google Scholar
  41. —. 1986. Lectures on Ideology and Utopia. Translated and edited by George H. Taylor. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  42. —. 1991. From Text to Action. Translated by Kathleen Blamey and John B. Thompson. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Rowe, Peter. 2005. “Spotlight on Public Role of Religion: Kyoto Prize Winner to Probe Issue at USD.” San Diego Union Tribune, March 3. Accessed July 20, 2013. http://www.utsandiego.com/uniontrib/20050303/news_lz1c3role.html.
  44. Stout, Jeffrey. 2008. “2007 Presidential Address: The Folly of Secularism.” Journal of the American Academy of Religion 76: 533–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Taylor, George H. 1986. Introduction to Lectures on Ideology and Utopia, by Paul Ricoeur, translated and edited by George H. Taylor, ix–xxxvi. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Thiselton, Anthony. 1992. New Horizons in Hermeneutics. Grand Rapids: Zondervan.Google Scholar
  47. Thomassen, Lasse. 2006. Introduction to The Derrida-Habermas Reader, edited by Lasse Thomassen, 1–10. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  48. Weinsheimer, Joel, and Hans-Georg Gadamer. 1985. Gadamer’s Hermeneutics: A Reading of Truth and Method. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Williams, Rowan. 2008a. “Secularism, Faith and Freedom.” In The New Visibility of Religion: Studies in Religion and Cultural Hermeneutics, edited by Michael Hoelzl and Graham Ward, 45–56. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  50. —. 2008b. “Civil and Religious Law in England: A Religious Perspective.” Paper presented at the Foundation Lecture in the Temple Festival Series at the Royal Courts of Justice, London, England, February 7. Accessed July 22, 2013. http://rowanwilliams.archbishopofcanterbury.org/articles.php/1137/archbishops-lecture-civil-and-religious-law-in-england-a-religious-perspective.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Timothy Stanley 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Timothy Stanley

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations