The Power of Flexibility for Mitigating Supply Chain Risks
Abstract
Despite the fact that many firms are instituting risk assessment programs to systematically uncover and estimate supply chain risks, very few firms are making concomitant investments to reduce risk. While the exact reasons for this are not known, Rice and Caniato (2004), Zsidisin et al. (2001, 2004) suspected that the lack of precise cost/benefit or return on investment (ROI) analyses can be one of the key reasons. To garner support for implementing certain risk reduction programs without exact analyses of certain risk reduction programs, Tang (2006) argued that risk reduction programs must provide strategic value to the firms regardless of the occurrence of major disruptions that rarely occur. Indeed, in addition to disruption risks, firms should be concerned about routine risks: frequently occurring problems that cause mismatches in supply and demand or higher than expected procurement costs. Specifically, Tang (2006) highlighted the strategic value of nine different supply chain risk reduction programs that would enable a firm to reduce these routine risks and those rare but severe supply disruption risks.
Keywords
Supply Chain Flexibility Strategy Supply Chain Risk Risk Reduction Program Secure Supply ChainPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- Jordan, W. and Graves, S. C. (1995) “Principles on the benefits of manufacturing process flexibility”, Management Science, 41, 577–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lee, H. and Whang, S. (1998) “Value of postponement”, in T.H. Ho and C.S. Tang (eds), Produce Variety Management: Research Advances, Kluwer Publishers, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
- Rice, B. and Caniato, F. (2004) “Supply Chain Response to Terrorism: Creating Resilient and Secure Supply Chains”, Supply Chain Response to Terrorism Project Interim Report, MIT Center for Transportation and Logistics, MIT, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
- Tang, C. S. (2006) “Robust strategies for mitigating supply chain disruptions”, International Journal of Logistics: Research and Applications, 9, 33–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Tang, C. S. and Tomlin, B. (2007) “The Power of Flexibility for Mitigating Supply Chain Risks”, working paper, UCLA Anderson School.Google Scholar
- Tsay, A. A. and Lovejoy, W. S. (1999) “Quantity flexible contracts and supply chain performance”, Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 1, 89–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Zsidisin, G., Panelli, A. and Upton, R. (2001) “Purchasing organisation involvement in risk assessments, contingency plans, and risk management: an exploratory study”, Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 187–197.Google Scholar
- Zsidisin, G., Ellram, L., Carter, J. and Cavinato, J. (2004) “An analysis of supply risk assessment techniques”, International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 34(5), 397–413.90–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar