Advertisement

Measuring National Wellbeing: What Matters to You? What Matters to Whom?

  • Susan Oman

Abstract

The Office for National Statistics’ (ONS) Measuring National Well-Being: ‘What Matters to You?’ debate ran between November 2010 and April 2011. The five-month debate took place across various platforms: an online questionnaire and forum, social media, postal submissions, a telephone line and 175 live events. The latter varied from workshops and focus groups with ‘people from all walks of life’, including some groups thought ‘hard-to-reach’,1 to large-scale public events with hundreds in attendance (Evans 2011: 5). In creating the debate, the ONS presented a space in which to listen to, discuss, collect and collate descriptions of what was important to individuals and communities in order to understand ‘what matters’ for the nation2 (Cameron 2010, Matheson 2011, Self et al. 2012). More than 30,000 responses describe what mattered to participants about wellbeing, which the ONS has indicated formed the basis of the UK’s national wellbeing domains and measures (Self et al. 2013: 2).

Keywords

Free Text Fields Wellbeing Measurement National Debate Mixed Methods Politics of Expertise Evidence-based Policy-making 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allin, P. (2007) Measuring Societal Wellbeing. Economic and Labour Market Review. Office for National Statistics 1(10): 46–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bache, I. and Reardon, L. (2013) An Idea Whose Time Has Come? Explaining the Rise of Well-Being in British Politics. Political Studies 61(4): 898–914.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Back, L. (2007) The Art of Listening. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
  4. Beaumont, J. (2011) Measuring National Well-Being: A Discussion Paper on Domains and Measures. Newport: Office for National Statistics.Google Scholar
  5. Bok, D. (2010) The Politics of Happiness: What Government Can Learn from the New Research on Well-Being. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cameron, D. (2010) Prime Minister’s Speech on Wellbeing on 25 November 2010. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/pm-speech-on-wellbeing [accessed 15 March 2013].
  7. Camfield, L. and Palmer-Jones, R. (2013) Improving the Quality of Development Research: What Could Archiving Qualitative Data for Reanalysis and Revisiting Research Sites Contribute? Progress in Development Studies 13(4): 323–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dolan, P., Layard, R. and Metcalfe, R. (2011) Measuring Subjective Well-Being for Public Policy. Newport: Office for National Statistics.Google Scholar
  9. Evans, J. (2011) Findings from the National Well-Being Debate. Available at: http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/guide-method/user-guidance/well-being/publications/findings-from-the-national-well-being-debate.pdf [accessed 1 May 2012].
  10. Fromm, E. (1994) The Art of Listening. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
  11. Fujiwara, D. (2013) Museums and Happiness: The Value of Participating in Museums and the Arts. Suffolk: The Happy Museum.Google Scholar
  12. Galloway, S. (2008) The Evidence Base for Arts and Culture Policy. Edinburgh: Scottish Arts Council.Google Scholar
  13. Garcia, J., Evans, J. and Reshaw, M. (2004) ‘Is There Anything Else You Would Like to Tell Us’ — Methodological Issues in the Use of Free-Text Comments from Postal Surveys. Quality & Quantity 38: 113–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Global Economic Forum (2013) Global Competitive Report. Available at: http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GlobalCompetitivenessReport_2013-14.pdf [accessed 1 February 2014].
  15. Gunarantam, Y. (2012) Learning to Be Affected: Social Suffering and Total Pain at Life’s Borders. The Sociological Review, 60(S1): 108–123. Available at: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/DOI:10.1111/j.1467-954X.2012.02119.x [accessed 13 May 2013].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Haworth, J. (2010) Life, Work, Leisure, and Enjoyment: The Role of Social Institutions. ESRC. Available at: http://www.wellbeing-esrc.com/downloads/LifeWorkLeisure&Enjoyment.pdf [accessed 13 March 2012].
  17. Hicks, D., Creaser, C., Greenwood, H., Spezi, V., White, S. and Frude, N. (2011) Public Library Activity in the Areas of Health and Well-Being. Final Report. Birmingham: Museums, Libraries and Archives Council.Google Scholar
  18. Hicks, S., Tinker, L. and Allin, P. (2013) Measuring Subjective Well-Being and Its Potential Role in Policy: Perspectives from the UK Office for National Statistics. Social Indicators Research 114(1): 73–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. HM Treasury (2003, updated 2011) The Green Book: Appraisal and Evaluation in Central Government. London.Google Scholar
  20. Jeffres, L. W., Bracken, C. C., Jian, G. and Casey, M. F. (2009) The Impact of Third Places on Community Quality of Life. Applied Research in Quality of Life 4(4): 333–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jeffries, S. (2008) Will This Man Make You Happy? The Guardian, Tuesday 24 June 2008. Available at: http://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2008/jun/24/healthandwellbeing.schools [accessed 12 June 2012].
  22. Kroll, C. (2011) Measuring Progress and Well-Being: Achievements and Challenges of a New Global Movement. Berlin: Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung.Google Scholar
  23. Law, J. (2009) Seeing Like a Survey. Cultural Sociology 3(2): 239–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Law, J., Ruppert, E. and Savage, M. (2011) The Double Social Life of Methods CRESC Working Paper 095. Available at: http://www.cresc.ac.uk/sites/default/files/The%20Double%20Social%20Life%20of%20Methods%20CRESC%20Working%20Paper%2095.pdf [accessed 15 August 2012].
  25. Law, J., Ruppert, E. and Savage, M. (eds.) (2013, July) Special Issue on the Social Life of Methods. Theory, Culture and Society. 30(4): 3–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lovell, R., Husk, K., Bethel, A. and Garside, R. (2014) What Are the Health and Well-Being Impacts of Community Gardening for Adults and Children: A Mixed Method Systematic Review Protocol. Environmental Evidence 3: 20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mason, J. (2007) Re-Using Qualitative Data: On the Merits of an Investigative Epistemology. Sociological Research Online 12(3). Available at: http://www.socresonline.org.uk/12/3/3.html. DOI: 10.5153/sro.1507 [accessed 12 December 2013].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Matheson, J. (2011) National Statistician’s Reflections on the National Debate on Measuring National Well-Being. Newport: Office of National Statistics.Google Scholar
  29. NatCen and CLS (2003) Millennium Cohort Study, First Survey: Code Book and Edit Instructions. Centre for Longitudinal Studies, Bedford Group for Lifecourse and Statistical Studies and Institute of Education, University of London.Google Scholar
  30. O’Brien, D. (2010) Measuring the Value of Culture: A Report to the Department for Culture Media and Sport. London: DCMS.Google Scholar
  31. O’Cathain, A. and Thomas, K. (2004) ‘Any Other Comments?’ Open Questions on Questionnaires — A Bane or a Bonus to Research? BMC Medical Research Methodology 4(25). Available at: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2288/4/25 [accessed 13 December 2013].
  32. O’Donnell, G. (2013) Using Well-Being as a Guide to Policy. pp. 96–111 in J. F. Helliwell, R. Layard and J. Sachs (eds.) World Happiness Report 2013. New York: UN Sustainable Development Solutions Network.Google Scholar
  33. Oman, S. (2012) Measuring National Wellbeing: The Public Debate That Was Never Ours. Arts Professional (257): 8, September 2012.Google Scholar
  34. Oman, S. (2013) A ‘Snapshot of Life’? What’s Missing from this Picture? Two Years of Measuring National Well-Being. Arts Professional, February 2013.Google Scholar
  35. OECD (2014) Competition. Available at: http://www.oecd.org/daf/competition/[accessed 1 March 2014].
  36. Office for National Statistics (2011) Measuring National Well-Being Technical Advisory Group. Friday 4 February 2011. Minutes available at: http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/guide-method/user-guidance/well-being/measuring-national-well-being-technical-advisory-group/Notes-from-the-meeting-on-4-february-2011.pdf [accessed 15 March 2014].
  37. Office for National Statistics (2012a) Measuring What Matters — Understanding the Nation’s Well-Being. Available at: http://www.ons.gov.uk/wellbeing [accessed 1 September 2012].
  38. Office for National Statistics (2012b) ONS Sheds More Light on Life in the UK News Release. Available at: http://www.ons.gov.uk/sons/dcp29904_287921.pdf [accessed 30 November 2012].
  39. Office of National Statistics (2001) 60 Years of Social Survey: 1941–2001. Norwich: HMSO.Google Scholar
  40. Rich, J. L., Chojenta, C. and Loxton, D. (2013) Quality, Rigour and Usefulness of Free-Text Comments Collected by a Large Population Based Longitudinal Study — ALSWH. PLoS ONE 8(7). Available at: http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0068832 [accessed 1 December 2013].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Richards, L. (2005) Handling Qualitative Data: A Practical Guide. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  42. Savage, M. (2007) Changing Social Class Identities in Post-War Britain: Perspectives from Mass-Observation. Sociological Research Online 12(3): 6. Available at: http://www.socresonline.org.uk/12/3/6.html. DOI: 10.5153/sro.1459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Savage, M. and Burrows, R. (2007) The Coming Crisis of Empirical Sociology. Sociology 41: 885.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Scott, K. (2012) Measuring Wellbeing. Towards Sustainability. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  45. Scott, K. (2014) Happiness on Your Doorstep: Disputing the Boundaries of Wellbeing and Localism. The Geographical Journal 181(2): 129–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Scott, J., Nolan, J. and Plagnol, A. (2009) Panel Data and Open-Ended Questions: Understanding Perceptions of Quality of Life. 21st Century Society 4(2): 123–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Seidman, I. (2013) Interviewing as Qualitative Research: A Guide for Researchers in Education and the Social Sciences. 4th ed. New York: Teachers’ College Press.Google Scholar
  48. Self, A., Thomas, J. and Randall, C. (2012) Measuring National Well-Being: Life in the UK, 2012. Newport: Office for National Statistics.Google Scholar
  49. Self, A., Thomas, J. and Randall, C. (2013) Measuring National Well-Being — Review of Domains and Measures, 2013. Newport: Office for National Statistics.Google Scholar
  50. Sen, A. (1999) Commodities and Capabilities. 2nd ed. Delhi New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Stiglitz, J. E., Sen A. and Fitoussi, J. P. (2009) Report by the Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress. OECD. Available at: http://www.stigliz-sen-fitoussi.fr/[accessed 3 April 2012].
  52. Stoll, L., Michaelson, J. and Seaford, C. (2012) Well-Being Evidence for Policy: A Review. London: New Economics Foundation.Google Scholar
  53. White, H. (1987) The Content of the Form: Narrative Discourse and Historical Representation. London: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  54. York, G. S., Churchman, R., Woodard, B., Wainright, C. and Rau-Foster, M. (2012) Free-Text Comments: Understanding the Value in Family Member Descriptions of Hospice Caregiver Relationships. American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine 29: 98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Susan Oman 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Susan Oman

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations