Measuring National Wellbeing: What Matters to You? What Matters to Whom?
The Office for National Statistics’ (ONS) Measuring National Well-Being: ‘What Matters to You?’ debate ran between November 2010 and April 2011. The five-month debate took place across various platforms: an online questionnaire and forum, social media, postal submissions, a telephone line and 175 live events. The latter varied from workshops and focus groups with ‘people from all walks of life’, including some groups thought ‘hard-to-reach’,1 to large-scale public events with hundreds in attendance (Evans 2011: 5). In creating the debate, the ONS presented a space in which to listen to, discuss, collect and collate descriptions of what was important to individuals and communities in order to understand ‘what matters’ for the nation2 (Cameron 2010, Matheson 2011, Self et al. 2012). More than 30,000 responses describe what mattered to participants about wellbeing, which the ONS has indicated formed the basis of the UK’s national wellbeing domains and measures (Self et al. 2013: 2).
KeywordsFree Text Fields Wellbeing Measurement National Debate Mixed Methods Politics of Expertise Evidence-based Policy-making
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Back, L. (2007) The Art of Listening. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
- Beaumont, J. (2011) Measuring National Well-Being: A Discussion Paper on Domains and Measures. Newport: Office for National Statistics.Google Scholar
- Cameron, D. (2010) Prime Minister’s Speech on Wellbeing on 25 November 2010. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/pm-speech-on-wellbeing [accessed 15 March 2013].
- Dolan, P., Layard, R. and Metcalfe, R. (2011) Measuring Subjective Well-Being for Public Policy. Newport: Office for National Statistics.Google Scholar
- Evans, J. (2011) Findings from the National Well-Being Debate. Available at: http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/guide-method/user-guidance/well-being/publications/findings-from-the-national-well-being-debate.pdf [accessed 1 May 2012].
- Fromm, E. (1994) The Art of Listening. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
- Fujiwara, D. (2013) Museums and Happiness: The Value of Participating in Museums and the Arts. Suffolk: The Happy Museum.Google Scholar
- Galloway, S. (2008) The Evidence Base for Arts and Culture Policy. Edinburgh: Scottish Arts Council.Google Scholar
- Global Economic Forum (2013) Global Competitive Report. Available at: http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GlobalCompetitivenessReport_2013-14.pdf [accessed 1 February 2014].
- Haworth, J. (2010) Life, Work, Leisure, and Enjoyment: The Role of Social Institutions. ESRC. Available at: http://www.wellbeing-esrc.com/downloads/LifeWorkLeisure&Enjoyment.pdf [accessed 13 March 2012].
- Hicks, D., Creaser, C., Greenwood, H., Spezi, V., White, S. and Frude, N. (2011) Public Library Activity in the Areas of Health and Well-Being. Final Report. Birmingham: Museums, Libraries and Archives Council.Google Scholar
- HM Treasury (2003, updated 2011) The Green Book: Appraisal and Evaluation in Central Government. London.Google Scholar
- Jeffries, S. (2008) Will This Man Make You Happy? The Guardian, Tuesday 24 June 2008. Available at: http://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2008/jun/24/healthandwellbeing.schools [accessed 12 June 2012].
- Kroll, C. (2011) Measuring Progress and Well-Being: Achievements and Challenges of a New Global Movement. Berlin: Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung.Google Scholar
- Law, J., Ruppert, E. and Savage, M. (2011) The Double Social Life of Methods CRESC Working Paper 095. Available at: http://www.cresc.ac.uk/sites/default/files/The%20Double%20Social%20Life%20of%20Methods%20CRESC%20Working%20Paper%2095.pdf [accessed 15 August 2012].
- Matheson, J. (2011) National Statistician’s Reflections on the National Debate on Measuring National Well-Being. Newport: Office of National Statistics.Google Scholar
- NatCen and CLS (2003) Millennium Cohort Study, First Survey: Code Book and Edit Instructions. Centre for Longitudinal Studies, Bedford Group for Lifecourse and Statistical Studies and Institute of Education, University of London.Google Scholar
- O’Brien, D. (2010) Measuring the Value of Culture: A Report to the Department for Culture Media and Sport. London: DCMS.Google Scholar
- O’Cathain, A. and Thomas, K. (2004) ‘Any Other Comments?’ Open Questions on Questionnaires — A Bane or a Bonus to Research? BMC Medical Research Methodology 4(25). Available at: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2288/4/25 [accessed 13 December 2013].
- O’Donnell, G. (2013) Using Well-Being as a Guide to Policy. pp. 96–111 in J. F. Helliwell, R. Layard and J. Sachs (eds.) World Happiness Report 2013. New York: UN Sustainable Development Solutions Network.Google Scholar
- Oman, S. (2012) Measuring National Wellbeing: The Public Debate That Was Never Ours. Arts Professional (257): 8, September 2012.Google Scholar
- Oman, S. (2013) A ‘Snapshot of Life’? What’s Missing from this Picture? Two Years of Measuring National Well-Being. Arts Professional, February 2013.Google Scholar
- OECD (2014) Competition. Available at: http://www.oecd.org/daf/competition/[accessed 1 March 2014].
- Office for National Statistics (2011) Measuring National Well-Being Technical Advisory Group. Friday 4 February 2011. Minutes available at: http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/guide-method/user-guidance/well-being/measuring-national-well-being-technical-advisory-group/Notes-from-the-meeting-on-4-february-2011.pdf [accessed 15 March 2014].
- Office for National Statistics (2012a) Measuring What Matters — Understanding the Nation’s Well-Being. Available at: http://www.ons.gov.uk/wellbeing [accessed 1 September 2012].
- Office for National Statistics (2012b) ONS Sheds More Light on Life in the UK News Release. Available at: http://www.ons.gov.uk/sons/dcp29904_287921.pdf [accessed 30 November 2012].
- Office of National Statistics (2001) 60 Years of Social Survey: 1941–2001. Norwich: HMSO.Google Scholar
- Rich, J. L., Chojenta, C. and Loxton, D. (2013) Quality, Rigour and Usefulness of Free-Text Comments Collected by a Large Population Based Longitudinal Study — ALSWH. PLoS ONE 8(7). Available at: http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0068832 [accessed 1 December 2013].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Richards, L. (2005) Handling Qualitative Data: A Practical Guide. London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Scott, K. (2012) Measuring Wellbeing. Towards Sustainability. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Seidman, I. (2013) Interviewing as Qualitative Research: A Guide for Researchers in Education and the Social Sciences. 4th ed. New York: Teachers’ College Press.Google Scholar
- Self, A., Thomas, J. and Randall, C. (2012) Measuring National Well-Being: Life in the UK, 2012. Newport: Office for National Statistics.Google Scholar
- Self, A., Thomas, J. and Randall, C. (2013) Measuring National Well-Being — Review of Domains and Measures, 2013. Newport: Office for National Statistics.Google Scholar
- Sen, A. (1999) Commodities and Capabilities. 2nd ed. Delhi New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Stiglitz, J. E., Sen A. and Fitoussi, J. P. (2009) Report by the Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress. OECD. Available at: http://www.stigliz-sen-fitoussi.fr/[accessed 3 April 2012].
- Stoll, L., Michaelson, J. and Seaford, C. (2012) Well-Being Evidence for Policy: A Review. London: New Economics Foundation.Google Scholar
- White, H. (1987) The Content of the Form: Narrative Discourse and Historical Representation. London: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar