Evaluating China’s Conventional Military Power: The Naval and Air Dimensions

  • Andrew S. Erickson
Part of the Asan-Palgrave Macmillan Series book series (APMS)

Abstract

Many aspects of People’s Liberation Army (PLA) development, such as the actual breakdown of People’s Republic of China (PRC)’s military budget by-service or within-service, remain unclear. But general prioritization and trends may be seen inductively from new Chinese hardware. What this all means in practice can be seen readily in Beijing’s actual military developments since the late 1990s. China is developing a formidable set of military capabilities to ensure stability on its borders and to attempt to shape territorial and maritime claims in its favor immediately beyond. It is developing weapons systems and employment patterns designed to threaten foreign forces should they intervene in sensitive disputes on China’s periphery—an approach that some Chinese sources term “counterintervention” and the US military terms “anti-access/area denial” (A2/AD). The goal is to deter such involvement in the first place and convince China’s neighbors that they must settle disputes on Beijing’s terms. China is also developing power projection platforms such as aircraft carriers and sending destroyers and frigates on naval diplomacy and nontraditional security missions, but these longer-range developments are happening gradually and do not represent high-end combat capabilities against another great power. Beijing can afford these efforts without making them the centerpiece of its investment. How, and to what extent, that might change in coming years is a difficult but important topic to analyze.

Keywords

Power Projection Military Capability Cruise Missile Electronic Warfare Sovereignty Dispute 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 2.
    Nan Li, “The Evolution of China’s Naval Strategy and Capabilities,” Asian Security, Vol. 5, No. 2 (June 2009), pp. 150, 156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 3.
    Military and Security Developments Involving the People’s Republic of China 2014, Annual Report to Congress (Arlington, VA: Office of the Secretary of Defense, June 5, 2014) [Hereafter, DoD, (Year)], p. 7.Google Scholar
  3. 4.
    Jesse Karotkin, Senior Intelligence Officer-China, Office of Naval Intelligence, “Trends in China’s Naval Modernization,” Testimony before the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission, Washington, DC, January 30, 2014. Available at: http://www.uscc.gov/sites/default/files/Karotkin_Testimony1.30.14.pdf [Hereafter, ONI].Google Scholar
  4. 7.
    Cdr. Gurpreet Khurana, Cdr. Kapil Narula, and Asha Devi, “PLA Navy Submarine Visits Sir Lanka,” Making Waves, Vol. 19, No. 9.2 (New Delhi: National Maritime Foundation, September 30, 2014), p. 37. Available at: http://maritimeindia.org/pdf/MW%209.2(Final).pdf.Google Scholar
  5. 20.
    Kenneth Allen and Morgan Clemens, The Recruitment, Education, and Training of PLA Navy Personnel, Naval War College China Maritime Study 12 (August 2014).Google Scholar
  6. 24.
    The Military Balance 2014 (London: International Institute for Strategic Studies, 2014), p. 233.Google Scholar
  7. 27.
    Yao Wei (ed.), China Air Force Encyclopedia (Beijing: Aviation Industry Press, 2005), Vol. 1, p. 57.Google Scholar
  8. 30.
    David Shlapak, “Chinese Air Superiority in the Near Seas,” in Peter Dutton, Andrew S. Erickson, and Ryan Martinson, eds., China’s Near Seas Combat Capabilities, Naval War College China Maritime Study 11 (February 2014). p. 67. Available at: https://www.usnwc.edu/Research—Gaming/China-Maritime-Studies-Institute/Publications.aspx.
  9. 31.
    Donald L. Fuell, Technical Director for Force Modernization and Employment, National Air and Space Intelligence Center, “Broad Trends in Chinese Air Force and Missile Modernization,” Testimony before the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission, Washington, DC, January 30, 2014. Available at: http://www.uscc.gov/sites/default/files/Lee%20Fuell_Testimony1.30.14.pdf [Hereafter, NASIC (2014)].Google Scholar
  10. 36.
    People’s Liberation Army Air Force 2010 (Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, OH: NASIC, 2010).Google Scholar
  11. 37.
    Data in this paragraph from Global Trends 2030: Alternative Worlds (Washington, DC: National Intelligence Council, 2012), pp. iv, 48, 103, 106. Available at: www.dni.gov/nic/globaltrends.
  12. 38.
    Ibid., p. 68.Google Scholar
  13. 39.
    Oriana Mastro, “A Global Expeditionary PLA, 2020–2025,” paper presented at “The PLA in 2025” conference, sponsored by National Bureau of Asian Research and Strategic Studies Institute, Army War College, Carlisle, PA, February 22, 2014.Google Scholar
  14. 62.
    Air-Sea Battle: Service Collaboration to Address Anti-Access and Area Denial Challenges (Arlington, VA: DoD, May 2013). Available at: http://www.defense.gov/pubs/ASB-ConceptImplementation-Summary-May-2013.pdf; Paul McLeary, “New US Concept Melds Air, Sea and Land,” Defense News, January 24, 2015. Available at: http://www.defensenews.com/story/defense/policy-budget/warfare/2015/01/24/air-sea-battle-china-army-navy/22229023/
  15. 63.
    Aaron Friedberg, Beyond Air-Sea Battle: The Debate over US Military Strategy in Asia (London: IISS, 2014).Google Scholar
  16. 64.
    Jan van Tol, et al., AirSea Battle: A Point-of-Departure Operational Concept (Washington, DC: CSBA, 2010). Available at: http://www.csbaonline.org/publications/2010/05/airsea-battle-concept/.Google Scholar
  17. 65.
    Joint Operational Access Concept (JOAC), Version 1.0 (Arlington, VA: Department of Defense, January 17, 2012), p. 24. Available at: http://www.defense.gov/pubs/pdfs/joac_jan%202012_signed.pdf.
  18. 66.
    T. X. Hammes, Offshore Control: A Proposed Strategy for an Unlikely Conflict, National Defense University Strategic Forum, No. 278 (June 2012), p. 3. Available at: http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a577602.pdf.
  19. 67.
    Gabriel Collins and William Murray, “No Oil for the Lamps of China?” Naval War College Review, Vol. 61, No. 2 (Spring 2008), pp. 79–95. Available at: https://www.usnwc.edu/getattachment/22821a31-a443-4bc7-95a6-54527ad8924a/No-Oil-for-the-Lamps-of-China—Collins,-Gabriel-.aspx.Google Scholar
  20. 68.
    Ben Schreer, “Clarify Air-Sea Battle; Asian Allies Warily Mull US Strategy,” Defense News, April 29, 2013.Google Scholar
  21. 69.
    Abraham M. Denmark, “Asia’s Security and the Contested Global Commons,” in Ashley J. Tellis, Andrew Marble, and Travis Tanner (eds.), Asia’s Rising Power and America’s Continued Purpose (Seattle, WA: National Bureau of Asian Research, 2012), p. 202.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Asan Institute 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andrew S. Erickson

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations