Costume Changes, Overlapping Histories: In the Mood for Love and 2046

  • Carla Marcantonio
Chapter
Part of the Global Cinema book series (GLOBALCINE)

Abstract

“All memories are traces of tears,” thus reads the first intertitle of 2046 (2004), which, as In the Mood for Love/Fa yeung nin wa (2000) had done before it, uses this throwback gesture to silent cinema to intersperse brief, poetic commentary at a few crucial points in the narrative. Yet, most likely, when one thinks of memory as a trace, one thinks of images, not tears. In the case of film, to speak of the image as trace is a manner of acknowledging that the images that a camera captures are forever a mark of the past. Cinema, in fact, depends on such traces, on those imprints that the world leaves of itself on a celluloid surface, which only later are arranged into narratives. Because of cinema’s ability to embalm and resurrect moments past, memory has proven to be an enduring subject for film and film studies, especially in the postwar era. More recently, given the advent of digital media, which allows for images to both travel at great speeds and be amply reproducible, the asynchronous character of memory has become an enduring object of fascination. Digital mediums further boast the capacity to manufacture an image of the world without ever having to come into contact with that world, be it objects, landscapes, or the human form. In this manner, the digital image closely approximates memory’s own capacity to embellish and color the traces of a world now past. And thus, though digital capture can still record traces of the world, it has completely transformed our relationship to “photographic” images.

Keywords

Port City Overlap History Khmer Rouge Historical Memory Love Affair 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    On the films as nostalgic, see Pam Cook, Screening the Past: Memory and Nostalgia in Cinema (New York: Routledge, 2005): 1–19.Google Scholar
  2. 6.
    My use of “no-time” here is distinct from Todd McGowan’s claim that 2046 sets apart eternity as a rupture within history. My use of the term “no-time” is, instead, a way to account for an overlapping of time, a simultaneity that occurs transversally across historical time periods. See Todd McGowan, Out of Time: Desire in Atemporal Cinema (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2011): 157–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 8.
    Jean Ma, Melancholy Drift: Marking Time in Chinese Cinema (Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press, 2010): 136–137 (citing Ackbar Abbas).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 17.
    Williams, “Melodrama Revised,” in Refiguring American Film Genres: History and Theory, ed. Nick Browne (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1998): 42–88.Google Scholar
  5. 18.
    Marcia Landy, Cinematic Uses of the Past (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1996),: 161.Google Scholar
  6. 19.
    See Revathi Krishnaswamy and John C. Hawley, eds. The Postcolonial and the Global (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2008).Google Scholar
  7. 20.
    Gina Marchetti, “Buying American, Consuming Hong Kong: Cultural Commerce, Fantasies of Identity and the Cinema,” in The Cinema of Hong Kong: History, Arts, Identity, eds. Poshek Fu and David Desser (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000): 289–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 30.
    Maynard Parker, “Reports: Hong Kong,,” Atlantic Monthly 220.5 (Hong Kong, November 1967): 14–28.Google Scholar
  9. 31.
    See Lawrence Cheuk-yin Wong, “The 1967 Riots: A Legitimacy Crisis?,” in May Days in Hong Kong: Riot and Emergency in 1967,eds. Robert Bickers and Ray Yep (Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press, 2009): 37–52.Google Scholar
  10. 32.
    Robert Bickers and Ray Yep, eds. May Days in Hong Kong: Riot and Emergency in 1967 (Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
  11. 33.
    Tomasulo, “ ‘I’ll See It When I Believe It’: Rodney King and the Prison House of Video,” in The Persistence of History: Cinema, Television, and the Modern Event, ed. Vivian Sobchack (New York: Routledge, 1996): 70.Google Scholar
  12. 35.
    Alison Landsberg, Prosthetic Memory: The Transformation of American Remembrance in the Age of Mass Culture (New York: Columbia University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
  13. 36.
    Hayden White, “The Modernist Event,” in The Persistence of History: Cinema, Television, and the Modern Event, ed. Vivian Sobchack (New York: Routledge, 1996).Google Scholar
  14. 38.
    Robert Burgoyne, “Modernism and the Narrative of Nation in JFK,” in The Persistence of History: Cinema, Television, and the Modern Event, ed. Vivian Sobchack (New York: Routledge, 1996): 114.Google Scholar
  15. 39.
    Karl Schoonover, Brutal Vision (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2011): xxviiGoogle Scholar
  16. Also on contingency and cinematic time, Mary Ann Doane, The Emergence of Cinematic Time: Modernity, Contingency, the Archive (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
  17. 42.
    Robert A. Rosenstone, History on Film/Film on History, Second Edition (New York: Routledge, 2012), Kindle Edition, loc. 246, 1305.Google Scholar
  18. 53.
    Marcia Landy, “Introduction,” in The Historical Film: History and Memory in Media, ed. Marcia Landy (New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 2000): 6. Note that here she is referencing the work of Antonio Gramsci.Google Scholar
  19. 60.
    Walter Benjamin, Illuminations: Essays and Reflections, ed. Hannah Arendt (New York: Shocken Books, 1968): 255.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Carla Marcantonio 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carla Marcantonio

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations