Advertisement

From Media Policy to ‘Big’ Media Policy: The Battle for Pluralism in Australia

  • Benedetta Brevini
Part of the Palgrave Global Media Policy and Business book series (GMPB)

Abstract

The year 2012 was a crucial turning point for media and journalism in many regions of the Western world. Sociologists frequently employ the term ‘critical junctures’ to explain the windows of opportunities for social change presented at specific times in history. The UK Leveson Inquiry into Culture, Practices, and Ethics of the Press was certainly one of the best examples of these ‘critical junctures’ that offered an unprecedented occasion to achieve structural reforms concerning media structures, journalism ethics and news standards. Certainly, the closure of the News of the World had a tangible effect in Australia, a country with direct links to UK media conglomerates, notably part of the Murdoch’s empire. In fact, the debate in the UK triggered the establishment in September 2011 of the Independent Media Inquiry into the Media and Media Regulation in Australia, frequently referred to as the Finkelstein Review. When the News of the World scandal spread, Australia’s Labor Government had already initiated an official appraisal of the country’s media systems with the aim to review ‘the operation of media and communications legislation in Australia and to assess its effectiveness in achieving appropriate policy objectives for the convergent era’ (Convergence Review, 2012, p. 110).

Keywords

Medium Policy Critical Juncture Commercial Television Broadcasting Service News Corp 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Australian Government (2014) ‘Media control and ownership: Policy background paper’ June 2014: http://www.presscouncil.org.au/uploads/52321/ufiles/Control_Background_Paper_Australian_Government_Department_of_Communications.pdf, date accessed 25th October.
  2. Barnett, S. (2010) ‘What’s wrong with media monopolies? A lesson from history and a new approach to media ownership policy’, MEDIA@LSE Electronic Working Papers, No 18: http://www.lse.ac.uk/media@lse/research/mediaworkingpapers/pdf/ewp1 8.pdf
  3. Baker, E. (2007). Media Concentration and Democracy: Why Ownership Matters. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Brevini, B. (2014) ‘Australia swims against the tide of democratic media reform’, The Conversation, 18h March: http://theconversation.com/australia-swims-against-the-tide-of-democratic-media-reform-24337, date accessed 25th October.Google Scholar
  5. Brevini, B. and Schlosberg, J. (in press) ‘Between philosophy and action: The story of the media reform coalition’ In: J. Obar, D. Freedman, R. McChesney and C. Martens (eds) Strategies for Media Reform: International Perspectives. New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Colebatch, H. K. (2002). Policy. Buckingham: Open University PressGoogle Scholar
  7. Convergence Review (2012). Convergence Review Final Report. Canberra, ACT: Department of Broadband, Communications and the Digital Economy.Google Scholar
  8. Daily Telegraph (2013) ‘Press freedom is public freedom,’ 13th March: http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/opinion/press-freedom-is-public-freedom/story-e6frezz0-1226595867820
  9. Day, M. (2013, March 13). A long wait for a dog’s breakfast. The Australian. Retrieved from: http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/opinion/a-long-wait-for-a-dogs-breakfast/story-e6frgd0x-1226595923345Google Scholar
  10. Di Lizia, F. (2014) ‘How have press freedom and press freedom debates in Australia developed following the report of the independent inquiry into the media and media regulation by the Finkelstein review?’ unpublished Thesis, Sydney, 2014Google Scholar
  11. Dwyer, T. (2014) ‘Press freedom discourse after Leveson: Ethics, elections and media concentration in Australia’, The Political Economy of Communication, 2(1), 49–59: http://www.polecom.org/index.php/polecom/article/view/Google Scholar
  12. Fairclough, N. (1989) Language and Power. London: Longman.Google Scholar
  13. Foucault, M. (1981 [1970]) ‘The order of discourse. Inaugural lecture at the Collège de France 2nd December 1970’ In: Young R. (ed.) Untying the Text, a Post-structuralist Reader. Boston: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  14. Finkelstein, R. (2012) Report of the Independent Inquiry into the Media and Media Regulation. Report to the Minister for Broadband, Communications and the Digital Economy. Canberra, ACT: Department of Broadband, Communications and the Digital Economy.Google Scholar
  15. Flew, T. (2013) ‘Academics and activists in the policy process: Engage-ment with Australian media inquiries 2011–13’ In: The Role of Advocacy in Media and Telecom Policy, 29 September-1 October 2013, New America Foundation, Washington DC.Google Scholar
  16. Flew, T. and Swift, A. (2013) ‘Regulating journalists? The Finkelstein review, the convergence review, and news media regulation in Australia’, Journal of Applied Journalism and Media Studies, 2(1), 181–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Flew, T. and Goldsmith, B. (2013) ‘FactCheck: Does Murdoch own 70 per cent of newspapers in Australia?’ The Conversation, 8 August: The Conversation https://theconversation.com/factcheck-does-murdoch-own-70-of-newspapers-in-australia-16812, date accessed 3 November 2014.
  18. Foucault, M. (1980) Power/knowledge: selected Interviews and other writings, 1972–1977. In Gordon, C. (ed.) Brighton: Harvester Press.Google Scholar
  19. Hackett, R.A and Carroll, W.K. (2006a) Remaking Media: The Struggle to Democratize Public Communication. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Ham, C. and Hill, M. (1993). The Policy Process in the Modern Capitalist State, 2nd Edition. Brighton: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
  21. Howlett, M. and Ramesh, M. (2003). Studying Public Policy: Policy Cycles and Policy Subsystems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Hudson, P. (2014) Malcolm Turnbull says ABC cuts no big deal. The Australian, 14 September 2014: http://www.theaustralian.com.au/media/malcolm-turnbull-says-abc-cuts-no-big-deal/story-e6frg996-1227072056164.Google Scholar
  23. Joint Select Committee on Broadcasting Legislation (2013) Three Broadcasting Reform Proposals http://www.aph.gov.au/parliamentary_business/committees/house_of_representatives_committees?url=jscbl/report/chapter1.htm.Google Scholar
  24. Jolly, R. (2012) Media Reviews: All Sound and Fury? Parliament of Australia: http://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/download/library/prspub/1958137/upload_binary/1958137.pdf;fileType=application%2Fpdf.Google Scholar
  25. Jolly, R. (2013) Media Reform: In Shallows and Misery. Parliament of Australia: http://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/download/library/prspub/2798879/upload_binary/2798879.pdf;fileType=application%2Fpdf.Google Scholar
  26. Jones, G. (2013) ‘These despots believe in controlling the press: Conroy joins them’, Daily Telegraph 13th March.Google Scholar
  27. Jones, T. and Mortensen, J. (2013). Proposed Media Reforms http://www.corrs.com.au/publications/corrs-in-brief/proposed-media-reforms/, date accessed 10 November 2014Google Scholar
  28. Galperin, H. (2004) ‘Beyond interests, ideas, and technology: An institutional approach to communication and information policy’, The Information Society, 20(3), 159–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Garnham, N. (2000). Emancipation, the Media, and Modernity: Arguments about the Media and Social Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kunzler, M. (2012). ‘“It’s the idea, stupid!” How ideas challenge broadcasting liberalization’ In: Just, N. and Puppis, M. (eds) Trends in Communicating Policy Research: New Theories, Methods and Subjects. ECREA Book Series (Vol. 7, pp. 55–74), United Kingdom: Intellect.Google Scholar
  31. Leveson B. (2012) ‘An inquiry into the culture, practices and ethics of the press: Executive summary’, The Leveson Inquiry, November. London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
  32. Lidberg, J. (2012). ‘If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it-Australian media industry attitudes to regulation and accountability reforms’, Pacific Journalism Review, 18(2), 68–88.Google Scholar
  33. Lidberg, J. and Hirst, M. (2013) ‘In the shadow of phone hacking: Media accountability inquiries in Australia,’ The Political Economy of Communication, 1(1), 111–121: http://polecom.org/index.php/polecom/article/view/15/152, date accessed 7 May 2013.Google Scholar
  34. Mitchell, J. (2014) ‘Media executives join forces to put their case for repeal of regulations to Turnbull,’ The Sydney Morning Herald: Business Day, 8 March, p. 11.Google Scholar
  35. Mitchell, J. (2014) ‘Turnbull pushes ahead on moves that could reshape industry,’ 17th July: http://www.smh.com.au/business/turnbull-pushes-ahead-on-moves-that-could-reshape-industry-20140716-3c1mr.html, date accessed 10 November 2014.
  36. News Limited (2012)’ submission to the independent inquiry into media and media regulation,’ 11 November 2011: http://www.dbcde.gov.au/ data/assets/pdf_file/0018/143055/News-Limited.pdf, date accessed 10 November 2014.
  37. Nielsen (2013) Australian Connected Consumers 2013, p. 194.Google Scholar
  38. Nielsen Online Ratings (2014) Top News Websites by unique Australian Audience, January 2014.Google Scholar
  39. Papandrea, F. and Tiffen, R. (2011) Media concentration in Australia: http://www.google.com.au/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved=0CB8QFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Finternationalmedia.pbworks.com%2Ff%2FDraft%2BAustralian%2BChapter%2B%2528June2011_Rev%2529.docx&ei=ROxvVMiYFI_q8AXt7YGABA&usg=AFQjCNGNu4OqNq_rL0rGfLxp5VdkI3Vs3Q&bvm=bv.80185997,d.dGc
  40. Pickard, V. (2013). ‘Social democracy or corporate libertarianism? Conflicting media policy narratives in the wake of market failure’, Communication Theory, 23 (4), pp. 336–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ricketson, M. (2012) ‘The Finkelstein inquiry: You wouldn’t read about it’, 21th May: http://www.abc.net.au/news/2012-05-21/ricketson-the-finkelstein-inquiry3a-you-wouldn27t-read-about-/4022628, date accessed 28 October
  42. The Courier Mail (2013) ‘Draconian law crosses the line’, 13th March: http://www.couriermail.com.au/news/editorial-draconian-law-crosses-the-line/story-e6frerc6-1226596023358?nk=e2ea0ba090de0104a2686cbbf27beea6, date accessed 1 November.
  43. Tingle, L. (2013) Full impact of Conroy’s media proposals is hidden. Financial Review. Retrieved from: http://www.afr.com/p/national/full_impact_of_conroy_media_proposals_837fL7ioMkztlWycIwh8COGoogle Scholar
  44. White, D. et al. (2014)’ scrap cross-media ownership rules: Fairfax,’ 24th February 2014: http://www.smh.com.au/business/media-and-marketing/scrap-crossmedia-ownership-rules-fairfax-20140224-33chq.html, date accessed 14 November.
  45. White, D. (2014) ‘Communications Minister Malcolm Turnbull: Higher level of consensus needed between media owners before cross-media ownership change,’ 21th August: http://www.smh.com.au/business/communications-minister-malcolm-turnbull-higher-level-of-consensus-needed-between-media-owners-before-crossmedia-ownership-change-20140821-106l4l.html, date accessed 14 November.
  46. Williams, K. (2013) An aggressive attempt to silence your media. The Daily Telegraph. Retrieved from: http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/opinion/an-aggressive-attempt-to-silence-your-media/story-e6frezz0-1226595884130Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Benedetta Brevini 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Benedetta Brevini

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations