The 1980s–1990s: Seen through IR Theory in China and Russia

  • Gilbert Rozman
Part of the International Relations and Comparisons in Northeast Asia book series (IRCNA)

Abstract

Looking back at the critical transformation of the international system in the 1980s–1990s, we should pay attention not only to IR theory in the West, but also look through the prism of IR theory in the Soviet Union and China, as this transformation was in progress, and in Russia and China, as they later reinterpreted what had changed and related it to theory aimed at explaining ongoing developments, of special interest in the 2010s. This leads to comparisons of IR theory in the two countries, comparisons across time in each country, and assessments of how their theories have performed in explaining developments with far-reaching consequences across Asia. Through the 1980s Soviet IR theory stood as the main alternative to IR theory in the West. Recently Chinese IR theory warrants consideration as the alternative drawing the widest attention. There are striking differences between the two, but there are also some little-noticed similarities, which may be indicative of a parallel impact. What is meant here by theory is not what is presented as such, but what takes the form of generalizations and predictions about how Asian relations are developing rooted in assumptions about the driving forces in how relationships among countries evolve.

Keywords

Foreign Policy National Identity World Order Peaceful Coexistence Shanghai Cooperation Organization 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    Margot Light, The Soviet Theory of International Relations (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1988).Google Scholar
  2. 7.
    V.V. Mikheev, Globalizatsiia i Aziatskii regionalism: Vyzovy dlia Rossii (Moscow: Institut Dal’nego Vostoka RAN, 2001).Google Scholar
  3. 10.
    T. A. Shakleina, Rossiia i SShA v novom mirovom poriadke (Moscow: Institut SShA I Kanady, RAN, 2002).Google Scholar
  4. 11.
    Andrei P. Tsyganov, Whose World Order? Russia’s Perceptions of American Ideas after the Cold War (Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 2004).Google Scholar
  5. 12.
    J. L. Black, Vladimir Putin and the New World Order: Looking East, Looking West? (Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 2004), pp. 297–321.Google Scholar
  6. 13.
    L. D. Grishchelova, “O nekotorykh funktsiiakh traditsionnoi kul’tury v sovremennoi Iaponii,” in Kul’turnoe nasledie narodov Vostoka i sovremennaia ideologicheskaia bor’ba (Moscow: Nauka, 1987), pp. 222–237.Google Scholar
  7. 14.
    T.A. Shakleina, Rossiia i SShA v novom mirovom poriadke (Moscow: Institut SShA I Kanady, RAN, 2002).Google Scholar
  8. 15.
    E. P. Bazhanov and N. E. Bazhanova, Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniia v XXI veke (Moscow: Vostok Zapad, 2011), p. 9, 32–52.Google Scholar
  9. 16.
    Allen Lynch, The Soviet Study of International Relations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987), pp. 49–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Gilbert Rozman 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gilbert Rozman

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations