Advertisement

Three Complementary, Simultaneous Approaches to Maritime Security in the East China Sea: International Law, Crisis Management, and Dialogue

  • Seigo Iwamoto
  • Kazuhiko Togo

Abstract

The various maritime and airspace military incidents with the potential to escalate into military conflicts that have occurred in and near the East China Sea demonstrate the security threat as well as the serious need for counteractive measures in the region. This chapter discusses these incidents and then introduces and recommends the simultaneous implementation of three complementary approaches to resolving the East China Sea disputes, particularly the Senkaku islands conflict, drawing from experiences in dealing with other territorial disputes: establishing a common understanding of international law; taking preventive measures including confidence-building measures against military collisions; and holding bilateral or multilateral dialogues and negotiations.

Keywords

Kuril Island Territorial Dispute International Civil Aviation Organization Simultaneous Approach Maritime Security 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 3.
    National Institute for Defense Studies, NIDS China Security Report, March 2011, 16, available at: http://www.nids.go.jp/publication/chinareport/pdf/china_report_EN_web_2011_A01.pdf, accessed November 29, 2014.Google Scholar
  2. 8.
    Jeremy Page, “Pacific Navies Agree on Code of Conduct for Encounters”, The Wall Street Journal, April 22, 2014, available at: http://online.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052702304049904579517342779110078. CUES was first formulated by the WPNS in 2003 as the Code for Unalerted Encounters at Sea. The National Institute for Defense Studies, Japan, East Asian Strategic Review 2013, 126, available at: http://www.nids.go.jp/english/publication/east-asian/pdf/2013/east-asian_e2013_03.pdf, accessed November 29, 2014. See “Code for unalerted encounters at sea (June 2003 version)”, Australian Journal of Maritime and Ocean Affairs (2012), Vol. 4, No. 4, pp. 126–130.Google Scholar
  3. 15.
    US Department of Defense, Annual Report to Congress on Military and Security Developments Involving the People’s Republic of China 2013, 39, available at: http://www.defense.gov/pubs/2013_China_Report_FINAL.pdf, accessed November 29, 2014.Google Scholar
  4. 20.
    Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan, “Nothern Territories Issue,” available at http://www.mofa.go.jp/region/europe/russia/territory/overview.html, accessed November 29, 2014.Google Scholar
  5. 27.
    Arms Control Association, “Hotline Agreements”, December 2012, available at: https://www.armscontrol.org/factsheets/Hotlines.Google Scholar
  6. 28.
    Choi He-suk, “Seoul, Beijing to set up defence hotline”, The Korea Herald, August 1, 2012, available at: http://www.asianewsnet.net/news-34296.html.Google Scholar
  7. 32.
    Pete Pedrozo indicates that many dangerous incidents between US and Soviet naval forces laid the groundwork for the negotiation and signing of the INCSEA Agreement in 1972. Pete Pedrozo, “The US-China Incidents at Sea Agreement: A Recipe for Disaster”, Journal of National Security Law & Policy, vol. 6, 2012, p. 207.Google Scholar
  8. 34.
    Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan, “Trends in Chinese Government and Other Vessels in the Waters Surrounding the Senkaku Islands, and Japans Response”, October 14, 2014, available at: http://www.mofa.go.jp/region/page23e_000021.html, accessed November 29, 2014.Google Scholar
  9. 37.
    Foreign Minister Takeo Fukuda’s statement in Kannpou (Japanese Government Gazette) of the House of Representatives, Okinawa and Northern Territories Special Committee, March 8, 1972, No. 3, pp. 2–3.Google Scholar
  10. 38.
    Akira Ishii Jianrong Zhu, Yoshihide Soneya and Lin Xiao Guang, eds, Nichuukokko Seijyoka/Nichuuheiwa Yukojyoyaku Teiketsukosho (Japan-China Diplomatic Normalization/Peace and Friendship Treaty Between Them), Tokyo Iwanami, 2003, 20.Google Scholar
  11. 39.
    The first newspaper report traced by author Togo that indicated that “Senkaku is an inherent territory of Japan and a territorial problem does not exist”, dates back to October 23, 1990 in the Yomiuri Shimbun.Google Scholar
  12. 40.
    See Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan, “About the Senkaku Islands,” available at: http://www.mofa.go.jp/region/asia-paci/senkaku/index.html, accessed November 29, 2014.Google Scholar
  13. 41.
    Charles E. Ziegler, Foreign Policy and East Asia: Learning and Adaptation in the Gorbachev Era, 1993, 92.Google Scholar
  14. 42.
    Joseph Ferguson, Japanese-Russian Relations, 1907–2007, 2008, 58.Google Scholar
  15. 44.
    Whereas South Korea has taken the legal position that no territorial dispute exists regarding the Dokdos, Japan has twice proposed to South Korea the submission of the Takeshima dispute to the ICJ, in 1954 and 1962. See ministry of Foreign Affairs, “Takesima Issue,” available at: http://www.mofa.go.jp/region/asia-paci/takeshima/position.html, accessed November 29, 2014.Google Scholar
  16. 45.
    “Japan is Back”, Policy Speech by Prime Minister Shinzo Abe at the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), February 22, 2013, available at: http://www.mofa.go.jp/announce/pm/abe/us_20130222en.html, accessed November 29, 2014.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Seigo Iwamoto and Kazuhiko Togo 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Seigo Iwamoto
  • Kazuhiko Togo

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations