Abstract
By applying the securitization framework in the Indian context, the previous chapter revealed that a full HIV/AIDS securitizing move was generated by the Indian government in 2004. However, as argued in chapter 7, the full securitizing move in 2004 was no longer maintained within the Indian government. In other words, HIV/AIDS was no longer framed as the most serious problem or perceived as a top-priority issue in the national government agenda. In this sense, the HIV/AIDS securitizing move in India existed in the failed rather than in full version.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Michael C. Williams, “The Continuing Evolution of Securitization Theory,” in Securitization Theory: How Security Problems Emerge and Dissolve, ed. Thierry Balzacq (London: Routledge, 2011), 215.
Pareena G. Lawrence and Maria C. Brun, “NGOs and HIV/AIDS Advocacy in India: Identifying the Challenges,” South Asia: Journal of South Asian Studies 34, no. 1 (2011): 72.
Sarah Hawkes and K. G. Santhya, “Diverse Realities: Sexually Transmitted Infections and HIV in India,” Sexually Transmitted Infections 78, Supplementary 1 (2002): 32.
Niranjan S. Karnik, “Locating HIV/AIDS and India: Cautionary Notes on the Globalization of Categories,” Science, Technology, & Human Values 26, no. 3 (2001): 327.
Alexandra L. Hernandez et al., “Sexual Behavior among Men Who Have Sex with Women, Men, and Hijras in Mumbai, India—Multiple Sexual Risks,” AIDS and Behavior 10, Supplementary 1 (2006): 8.
Sameer Kumta et al., “Bisexuality, Sexual Risk Taking, and HIV Prevalence among Men Who Have Sex with Men Accessing Voluntary Counseling and Testing Services in Mumbai, India,” Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes 53, no. 2 (2010): 227–233.
See S. Sarkar et al., “Rapid Spread of HIV among Injecting Drug Users in North-Eastern States of India,” Bulletin on Narcotics 45, no. 1 (1993): 91–105.
Mukta Sharma et al., “Five Years of Needle Syringe Exchange in Manipur, India: Program and Contextual Issues,” International Journal of Drug Policy 14, nos. 5–6 (2003): 408.
Pradeep Seth, “The Situation of HIV/M. Tuberculosis Co-infection in India,” The Open Infectious Disease Journal 5, Supplementary 1-M5 (2011): 51.
Uma Kapila, Indian Economy: Performance and Policies (New Delhi: Academic Foundation, 2008–2009), 260.
Qiu-sha Ma, “Defining Chinese Nongovernmental Organizations,” Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations 13, no. 2 (2002): 118.
Thierry Balzacq, “The Three Faces of Securitization: Political Agency, Audience and Context,” European Journal of International Relations 11, no. 2 (2005): 185.
Catherine Boone and Jake Batsell, “Politics and AIDS in Africa: Research Agendas in Political Science and International Relations,” in HIV/AIDS and the Threat to National and International Security, ed. R. L. Ostergard (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007), 14.
Ilavenil Ramiah, “Securitizing the AIDS Issue in Asia,” in Non-Traditional Security in Asia: Dilemmas in Securitization, ed. Mely Caballero-Anthony, Ralf Emmers, and Amitav Acharya (England: Ashgate Publishing Limited, 2006a), 151.
Copyright information
© 2015 Catherine Yuk-ping Lo
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lo, C.Yp. (2015). Audience Acceptance in India: Case Studies in New Delhi, Mumbai, and Imphal. In: HIV/AIDS in China and India. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137504210_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137504210_8
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-50419-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-50421-0
eBook Packages: Palgrave Intern. Relations & Development CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)