Communicative Practices in Staff Support of Adults with Intellectual Disabilities
This chapter is about some of the ways in which adults with intellectual disabilities (such as, e.g. those with Down syndrome) communicate with those around them — most specifically, with staff who are charged with supporting them. Such staff help service users live independently, by overseeing their day-to-day household activities, arranging travel, planning leisure outings, and providing accompaniment to institutional appointments. In the United Kingdom (UK),1 recent government policy places great value on the activities of support staff in the promotion of choice, control, and empowerment. The Care Act 2014 (UK Government, 2014) placed a duty on local authorities to promote an individual’s well-being, which includes ‘control by the individual over day-to-day life (including over care and support)’ and ‘participation in work, education, training or recreation’. In doing this, the authority must have regard for ‘the individual’s wishes, views, feelings or beliefs’, with the individual ‘participating as fully as possible in decisions … and being provided with the information and support necessary to enable the individual to participate’.
KeywordsStaff Member Down Syndrome Intellectual Disability Service User Intellectual Disability
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Beamer, S., & Brookes, M. (2001). Making decisions: Best practice and new ideas for supporting people with high support needs to make decisions. London: VIA.Google Scholar
- Edge, J. (2001). Who’s in control?: Decision-making by people with learning difficulties who have high support needs. London: Values Into Action.Google Scholar
- HM Government. (2005). The Government’s annual report on Learning Disability, 2005. Valuing people: Making things better. Norwich: TSO.Google Scholar
- Jenkinson, J., Copeland, C., Drivas, B., Scoon, H., & Yap, M. L. (1992). Decision-making by community residents with an intellectual disability. Australia and New Zealand Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 18, 1–8.Google Scholar
- Learning Disability Taskforce. (2004). Rights, independence, choice and inclusion. London: Learning Disability Taskforce.Google Scholar
- Social Exclusion Unit. (2005) Improving services, improving lives: Evidence and key themes. Interim report. London: Office of the Deputy Prime Minister.Google Scholar
- Sidnell, J. (2010). Conversation analysis: An introduction. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Williams, V. (2010). Disability and discourse: Analysing inclusive conversation with people with intellectual disabilities. Chichester, England: Wiley/Blackwell.Google Scholar
- • Antaki, C., & Wilkinson, R. (2013). Conversation analysis and the study of atypical populations. In T. Stivers & J. Sidnell (Eds.), Handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 533–550). Chichester, UK: Blackwell-Wiley.Google Scholar
- • Williams, V. (2010). Disability and discourse: Analysing inclusive conversation with people with intellectual disabilities. Chichester, England: Wiley/Blackwell.Google Scholar