The Civil War in British Military Thought

  • Nimrod Tal
Chapter

Abstract

From the outset the Civil War caught the British military’s attention. For its scale and scope, because of politicians’ involvement in military affairs and generals’ intervention in politics, for the introduction of new technologies, and for its actual and potential impact on their country, British officers observed closely the American conflict. As Hugh Dubrulle has argued, during the war British military men looked almost solely to the Confederacy for positive lessons. Professionally, Britons thought that the Confederate States Army executed its military operations on a level near perfection. On political grounds, they supported the South’s struggle for national independence, the preservation of its agrarian, genteel way of life, and its social and political hierarchies. British military thinkers attributed the Confederacy’s superb military conduct to these values and goals. By contrast, they viewed the North as imposing an unwanted national unity and decadent lifestyle on the South. Northern institutions — especially capitalism and mass democracy that the British regarded as derivatives of mob rule — appalled Britain’s military elite, who regarded those institutions as the source of the North’s military weaknesses and failures.1 These were seen also as the reason for the war’s massive scale and horrific casualties.

Keywords

Interwar Period Military Affair American Power Modern Warfare British Culture 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    Hugh Dubrulle, ‘A Military Legacy ol the Civil War: The British Inheritance’, Civil War History, Vol. 49, No. 2 (2003), pp. 153–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Brian Holden Reid, ‘“A Signpost that was Missed”? Reconsidering British Lessons from the American Civil War’, The Journal of Military History, Vol. 70, No. 2 (2006), pp. 385–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jay Luvaas, The Military Legacy of the Civil War: European Inheritance (Chicago, 1959), pp. 115–18.Google Scholar
  4. On the British view ol these conflicts see: Dora Neill Raymond, British Policy and Opinion during the Franco-Prussian War (New York: Columbia University, 1921)Google Scholar
  5. Peter H. Peel, British Public Opinion and the Wars of German Unification, 1864–1871 (College Park, MD: International Research Institute for Political Science, 1981)Google Scholar
  6. P. M. Kennedy, ‘Idealists and Realists: British Views ol Germany, 1864–1939’, Transactions of the Royal Historical Society, 25 (December 1975), pp. 140–2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Richard Millman, British Foreign Policy and the Coming of the Franco-Prussian War (Oxford, 1965).Google Scholar
  8. 4.
    Arthur Fremantle, Three Months in the Southern States: April–June, 1863 (New York, 1864), p. 6.Google Scholar
  9. 5.
    See also: Luvaas, ‘G. F. R. Henderson and the American Civil War’, Military Affairs, Vol. 20, No. 3 (1956), p. 149.Google Scholar
  10. 6.
    G. F. R. Henderson, ‘The Campaign in the Wilderness in Virginia, 1865’: A lecture to the Military Society ol Ireland, 24 January 1894, in: Neill Malcolm, (ed.), The Science of War: A Collection of Essays and Lectures 1892–1903 (London, 1905), p. 309.Google Scholar
  11. 7.
    T. G. Otte, ‘“The Method in which We Were Schooled by Experience”: British Strategy and a Continental Commitment Before 1914’, in: K. Neilson and G. Kennedy(eds), The British Way in Warfare: Power and the International System, 1856–1956: Essays in Honour of David French (Farnham, 2010), pp. 303–19;Google Scholar
  12. C. Messenger, Call-to-Arms: The British Army, 1914–18 (London, 2006), pp. 15–37.Google Scholar
  13. 8.
    Correlli Barnett, Britain and Her Army: A Military, Political and Social History of the British Army, 1509–1970 (London, 2000), pp. 353–70.Google Scholar
  14. 10.
    Ian F. W. Beckett, ‘The South African War and the Late Victorian Army’, in: Dennis and Grey (eds), The Boer War: Army, Nation and Empire: The 1999 Chief of Army, Australian War Memorial, Military History Conference (Canberra, 2000), pp. 33–4Google Scholar
  15. Stephen M. Miller, Volunteers on the Veld: Britain’s Citizen-Soldiers and the South African War, 1899–1902 (Norman, 2007), pp. 56–76.Google Scholar
  16. On the war’s profound impact in Britain more generally see: Andrew Thompson, ‘Publicity, Philanthropy and Commemoration: British Society and the War’, in: David Omissi and Andrew S. Thompson, The Impact of the South African War (New York, 2002), pp. 101–13Google Scholar
  17. Bill Nasson, ‘Waging Total War in South Africa: Some Centenary Writings on the Anglo-Boer War, 1899–1902’, The Journal of Military History, Vol. 66, No. 3 (2002), pp. 813–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Paul Readman, ‘The Conservative Party, Patriotism, and British Politics: The Case of the General Election of 1900’, The Journal of British Studies, Vol. 40, No. 1 (January 2001), pp. 107–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 11.
    George W. Redway, The War of Secession, 1861–1862, Bull Run to Malvern Hill (London, 1910), p. 39.Google Scholar
  20. See also: Redway, Fredericksburg, A Study in War (London, 1906).Google Scholar
  21. 13.
    Brian Holden Reid, Studies in British Military Thought: Debates with Tuller and Liddell Hart (Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press, 1998), p. 136.Google Scholar
  22. 14.
    Philip H. Dalbiac, The American War of Secession, 1863: Chancellorsville and Gettysburg (London, 1911), p. 6.Google Scholar
  23. 15.
    Keith T. Surridge, Managing the South African War 1899–1902: Politicians v. Generals (Woodbridge, 1998), pp. 6–18.Google Scholar
  24. 16.
    W. B. Wood and J. E. Edmonds, A History of the Civil War in the United States, 1861–5 (London, 1905), p. 16.Google Scholar
  25. 17.
    Garnet Wolseley, General Lee (Rochester, 1906), p. 6.Google Scholar
  26. 18.
    G. F. R. Henderson, Stonewall Jackson and the American Civil War (London, 1898), I, pp. 2–3.Google Scholar
  27. 21.
    On Wolseley’s revised view of Lincoln see: James A. Rawley, (ed.), The American Civil War: An English View (Charlottesville, VA, 1964), p. 30.Google Scholar
  28. 22.
    Wolseley, General Lee (Rochester, 1906 [1887]), p. 9.Google Scholar
  29. 24.
    Redway, The War of Secession, 1861–1862, Bull Run to Malvern Hill (London, 1910), p. 8.Google Scholar
  30. 26.
    Eric W. Sheppard, The Campaign in Virginia and Maryland: Cedar Run, Manassas and Sharpsburg (London, 1911), p. 149.Google Scholar
  31. 27.
    John R. Neff, Honoring the Civil War Dead: Commemoration and the Problem of Reconciliation (Lawrence, KS, 2005), pp. 161–2.Google Scholar
  32. 28.
    J. C. Ropes, The History of the American Civil War (New York, 1895), I, p. 110.Google Scholar
  33. 29.
    Ropes, The Army Under Pope (New York, 1881), p. 8.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    George C. Herring, From Colony to World Power: U.S. Toreign Relations since 1776 (Oxford, 2008), p. 336.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Maurice, Lee’s Aide-de-Camp (Lincoln, NE, 2000 [1927]), p. 13.Google Scholar
  36. 37.
    Leo Amery, The Times History of the War in South Africa 1899–1902 (London, 1900–1909), I, p. 23.Google Scholar
  37. 38.
    G. F. R. Henderson, ‘The American Civil War, 1861–1865’, A Lecture to the Aldershot Military Society, Part I, 9 February 1892, in: Neill Malcolm (ed.), The Science of War: A Collection of Essays and Lectures 1892–1903 (London: Longmans, Green, 1905), p. 231.Google Scholar
  38. 40.
    Billie Melman, The Culture of History: English Uses of the Past 1800–1953 (Oxford, 2006), p. 5.Google Scholar
  39. 41.
    Paul Readman, ‘The Place of the Past in English Culture c. 1890–1914’, Past & Present, Vol. 186, No. 1 (2005), pp. 149–50.Google Scholar
  40. 42.
    Reba N. Softer, History, Historians, and Conservatism in Britain and America: The Great War to Thatcher and Reagan (Oxford, 2009), pp. 183–6Google Scholar
  41. Softer, Discipline and Power: The University, History, and the Making of an English Elite, 1870–1930 (Stanford, 1994), pp. 19–38.Google Scholar
  42. 44.
    Commodore M. F. Maury, ‘A Vindication of Virginia and the South’, Southern Historical Society Papers, Vol. 1 (February 1876), p. 61, http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus%3Atext%3A2001.05.0001. Accessed on 11 February 2012.Google Scholar
  43. 46.
    Henderson, ‘The American Civil War, 1861–1865’, A Lecture to the Aldershot Military Society, Part I, 9 February 1892, in: Malcolm (ed.), The Science of War, p. 231.Google Scholar
  44. 48.
    Alex Danchev, Alchemist of War: The Life of Basil Liddell Hart (London, 1999), pp. 49–63.Google Scholar
  45. 53.
    Brian Holden Reid, War Studies at the Staff College 1890–1930 (Camberley, 1992), pp. 13–20.Google Scholar
  46. 56.
    See for example: Maurice, British Strategy: A Study of the Application of the Principles of War (London, 1929), pp. 215–18.Google Scholar
  47. 57.
    Frederick Maurice, Robert E. Lee: The Soldier (Boston, 1925), p. 243.Google Scholar
  48. 58.
    Elizabeth Greenhalgh, ‘David Lloyd George, Georges Clemenceau, and the 1918 Manpower Crisis’, The Historical Journal, Vol. 50, No. 2 (2007), pp. 397–421, esp. pp. 401–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 59.
    Nancy Maurice, (ed.), The Maurice Case: From the Papers of Major-General Sir Trederick Maurice (London, 1972), pp. 191–2.Google Scholar
  50. 60.
    Adrian Gregory, ‘“You Might As Well Recruit Germans”: British Public Opinion and the Decision to Conscript the Irish in 1918’, in: Adrian Gregory and Senia Pašeta, Ireland and the Great War: A War to Unite Us All? (Manchester, 2002), p. 116.Google Scholar
  51. 62.
    George H. Cassar, Lloyd George at War, 1916–1918 (London, 2009), pp. 262–5.Google Scholar
  52. 64.
    David R. Woodward, ‘Did Lloyd George Starve the British Army of Men Prior to the German Offensive of 21 March 1918?’, The Historical Journal, Vol. 27, No. 1 (1984), pp. 241–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Paul Harris and Sanders Marble, ‘The “Step-by-Step” Approach: British Military Thought and Operational Method on the Western Front, 1915–1917’, War in History, Vol. 15, No. 1 (2008), pp. 25–8Google Scholar
  54. Nick Lloyd, ‘“With Faith and Without Fear”: Sir Douglas Haig’s Command of First Army during 1915’, The Journal of Military History, Vol. 71, No. (2007), p. 1076Google Scholar
  55. For criticism of Lloyd George’s conduct see: Trevor Wilson and Robin Prior, ‘British Decision-Making 1917: Lloyd George, the Generals and Passchendaele’, in: Hugh Cecil and Peter Liddle, (eds), Facing Armageddon: The First World War Experienced (London, 1996), pp. 93–102Google Scholar
  56. Brock Millman, ‘A Counsel of Despair: British Strategy and War Aims, 1917–18’, Journal of Contemporary History, Vol. 36, No. 2 (2001), pp. 241–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 68.
    In addition to his press releases, Maurice had also expressed his criticism in other ways, such as in the highly commentated book Forty Days in 1914 from 1919, see: Maurice, Forty Days in 1914 (London, 1919), pp. 195–201.Google Scholar
  58. 71.
    Maurice, Governments and War: A Study of the Conduct of War (London, 1926), pp. 154–9.Google Scholar
  59. 73.
    Basil Liddell Hart, Sherman: The Genius of the Civil War (London, 1930), p. 344.Google Scholar
  60. 78.
    For a succinct explanation of the strategy of the indirect approach see: Liddell Hart, ‘Strategy: The Indirect Approach’, in: Thomas G. Mahnken and Joseph A. Maiolo (eds), Strategic Studies: A Reader (London, 2008), pp. 82–5Google Scholar
  61. for how Liddell Hart saw its implications in other places other than the American Civil War see: Liddell Hart, The British Way in Warfare (London, 1932), pp. 19–20 (Napoleon) and pp. 103–4 (Hannibal).Google Scholar
  62. 82.
    Liddell Hart, The Strategy of Indirect Approach (London, 1941), p. 192.Google Scholar
  63. 83.
    Alex Danchev, Alchemist of War: The Life of Basil Liddell Hart (London, 1999), pp. 49–63.Google Scholar
  64. 84.
    Liddell Hart, The British Way in Warfare (London, 1932), p. 7.Google Scholar
  65. 85.
    Liddell Hart, From Atlanta to the Sea (London, 1961), p. 15.Google Scholar
  66. 86.
    David French, ‘Doctrine and Organization in the British Army, 1919–1932’, The Historical Journal, Vol. 44, No. 2 (2001), pp. 497–515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. William Philpott, ‘Beyond the “Learning Curve”: The British Army’s Military Transformation in the First World War’, on the website of the Royal United Services Institute (RUSI), November 2009: http://www.rusi.org/analysis/commentary/ ref:C4AF97CF94AC8B. Accessed on 1 October 2010.Google Scholar
  68. For additional criticism on Liddell Hart’s thought see: Correlli Barnett, ‘Basil Faculty?: Finds Liddell Hart’s Influence on Strategic Thinking a Matter of Wonder and Regret’, RUSI Journal, Vol. 144, No. 2 (1999), p. 6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 87.
    See: Basil Liddell Hart, Contrasts of 1939 — Mobility or Stagnation, Coast Artillery Journal (January–February 1932), pp. 21–25.Google Scholar
  70. 89.
    For a thorough account of Liddell Hart’s omissions and inaccuracies regarding Sherman, see: Albert Castel, ‘Liddell Hart’s “Sherman”: Propaganda as History’, The Journal of Military History, Vol. 67, No. 2 (2003), pp. 405–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 92.
    J. F. C. Fuller, Grant & Lee: A Study in Personality and Generalship (London, 1933), p. 43.Google Scholar
  72. 93.
    J. F. C. Fuller, The Generalship of Ulysses S. Grant (London, 1929), p. 358Google Scholar
  73. and Fuller, ‘The Place of the American Civil War in the Evolution of War’, The Army Quarterly, XXVI (1933), pp. 318–20.Google Scholar
  74. 96.
    Fuller, Lectures on T. S. R. II (London, 1931), p. 126.Google Scholar
  75. 97.
    Fuller, The Conduct of War, 1789–1961: A Study of the Impact of the Trench, Industrial and Russian Revolutions on War and its Conduct (London, 1972), pp. 176–7.Google Scholar
  76. 108.
    David Reynolds, Rich Relations: The American Occupation of Britain, 1942–1945 (London, 1995), p. 3–5.Google Scholar
  77. 112.
    Jay Luvaas, The Education of an Army: British Military Thought, 1815–1940 (London, 1965), p. 205.Google Scholar
  78. 114.
    Maurice, ‘Disarmament’, Journal of the Royal Institute of International Affairs, Vol. 5, No. 3 (1926), p. 129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 116.
    Azar Gat, Tascist and Liberal Visions of War: Fuller, Liddell Hart, Douhet, and Other Modernists (Oxford, 1998), p. 187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. See: Basil Liddell Hart, The Memoirs of Captain Liddell Hart (London, 1965), I, p. 248 and p. 357.Google Scholar
  81. 128.
    Fuller, Empire Unity and Defence (Bristol, 1934).Google Scholar
  82. 129.
    First published as an article in The National Review under the title ‘The Americans’, see: J. F. C. Fuller, ‘The Americans’, The National Review, No. 503, (January 1925), pp. 730–9.Google Scholar
  83. For the book version used in this study see: Fuller, Atlantis: America and the Tuture (London, 1926).Google Scholar
  84. 133.
    F. C. Fuller, War and Western Civilization, 1832–1932: A Study of War as a Political Instrument and the Expression of Mass Democracy (London, 1932), p. 84.Google Scholar
  85. 135.
    On Fuller’s admiration olyouthful and revolutionary spirit, see: Brian Holden Reid, ‘“Young Turks, or Not So Young?”: The Frustrated Quest of Major General J. F. C. Fuller and Captain B. H. Liddell Hart’, The Journal of Military History, Vol. 73, No. 1 (2009), p. 149.Google Scholar
  86. 136.
    J. F. C. Fuller, The Decisive Battles of the United States (London, 1942), p. 206.Google Scholar
  87. 146.
    Samuel Hynes, A War Imagined: The Tirst World War and English Culture (London, 1992), p. 11.Google Scholar
  88. 152.
    Burne, Lee, Grant and Sherman: A Study in Leadership in the 1864–65 Campaign (Lawrence, KS, 2000), pp. v–vi.Google Scholar
  89. 153.
    Janet Watson, Lighting Different Wars: Experience, Memory, and thepirst World War in Britain (Cambridge, 2004), pp. 3–8.Google Scholar
  90. 154.
    Eric W. Sheppard, The American Civil War (Aldershot, 1938), p. 40.Google Scholar
  91. 155.
    Eric W. Sheppard, The Study of Military History (Aldershot, 1952, 3rd ed.), p. 35.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Nimrod Tal 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nimrod Tal

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations