Ryle and Strawson on Category Mistakes
In the volume of essays on Gilbert Ryle published in 1970 by George Pitcher and Oscar Wood, there is a paper by Peter Strawson on categories. In my contribution to this new volume on Ryle, I go through some now well-recognised difficulties with Ryle’s own treatment of categories, and in particular of category mistakes. I then consider some general problems that beset the efforts of others to do better, before turning to Strawson’s suggestions, which as far as I can discover have never been discussed in print. These suggestions have obvious merits, but I end by arguing that they are less than fully successful.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Körner, S. (1970) Categorial Frameworks ( Oxford: Blackwell).Google Scholar
- Pitcher, G. and O.P. Wood (eds) (1970) Ryle: a Collection of Critical Essays ( London: Macmillan ).Google Scholar
- Ryle, G. ( 2000 ) The Concept of Mind ( London: Pengu in Books).Google Scholar
- Ryle, G. (1966) ‘Categories’ in A.G.N. Flew (ed.) Logic and Language II ( Oxford: Blackwell ), pp. 65–81.Google Scholar
- Sommers, F. (1960) ‘The Ordinary Language Tree’, Mind 69 (270): 160–85.Google Scholar
- Sommers (1965) ‘Predicability’ in M. Black (ed.) Philosophy in America ( London: George Allen & Unwin ), pp. 262–81.Google Scholar
- Strawson, P.F. (1970) ‘Categories’ in G. Pitcher and O.P. Wood (eds) Ryle: a Collection of Critical Essays ( London: Macmillan ), pp. 181–211.Google Scholar