Afterlife of Events pp 79-94 | Cite as
Theories of Cultural Memory and the Concept of ‘Afterlife’
Abstract
Over the last decades we have witnessed a ‘continental shift’ in the structure of Western temporality. Experience teaches not only that specific visions of the future have crumbled but that even the concept of the future as such has changed beyond recognition. In many areas, such as politics, society and environment, the future has lost its lure. It can no longer be used indiscriminately as the vanishing point of wishes, goals and projections. Why did this happen? Why have the shares of the future fallen in the stock market of our value system? There are obvious answers that immediately come to mind: the resources of the future have been eroded through a number of new dramatic challenges, such as the ongoing ecological pollution that accompanies the development of our technical civilization, the demographic problems such as overpopulation and ageing societies, the scarcity of natural resources such as fuel and drinking water, and climate change. Under these premises, the future can no longer serve as the Eldorado of our hopes and wishes, rendering also the promise of irreversible progress more and more obsolete. Change is no longer automatically assumed to be a change for the better. The future, in short, has become an object of concern, prompting ever new measures of precaution.1
Keywords
Impact Event National Memory Nation Building Cultural Memory Nobel Peace PrizePreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Bibliography
- Arendt, Hannah [1951] 1973. The Origins of Totalitarianism. San Diego et al.obsolete: Harcourt Brace & Company.Google Scholar
- Assmann, Aleida 2010. ‘The Holocaust — a Global Memory? Extensions and Limits of a New Memory Community’, in Aleida Assmann, Sebastian Conrad (eds.), Memory in a Global Age: Discourses, Practices and Trajectories. Houndmills and New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 97–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Assmann, Aleida 2013. Ist die Zeit aus den Fugen? Aufstieg und Fall des Zeitregimes der Moderne. Munich: Hanser.Google Scholar
- Boer, Pim den; Duchhardt, Heinz; Kreis, Georg; Schmale, Wolfgang (eds.) 2011–2012. Europäische Erinnerungsorte, 3 vols. Munich: Oldenbourg.Google Scholar
- Boym, Svetlana 2007. ‘Nostalgia and Its Discontents’, Hedgehog Review 9, 7–18.Google Scholar
- Chakrabarty, Dipesh 2007. ‘History and the Politics of Recognition’, in Keith Jenkins, Sue Morgan, Alun Munslow (eds.), Manifestos for History. London and New York: Routledge, 77–86.Google Scholar
- Fuchs, Anne 2011. After the Dresden Bombing: Pathways of Memory 1945 to the Present. Houndmills, New York: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hahn, Hans Henning; Traba, Robert (eds.) 2012–2013. Deutsch-Polnische Erinnerungsorte, 5 vols. Paderborn: Ferdinand Schöningh.Google Scholar
- Huyssen, Andreas 2000. ‘Present Pasts: Media, Politics, Amnesia’, Public Culture 12, 1, 21–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Jarausch, Konrad H. 2010. ‘Nightmares of Daydreams? A Postscript on the Europeanisation of Memories’, in Malrgorzata Pakier, Bo Stråth (eds.), A European Memory? Contested Histories and Politics of Remembrance. New York: Berghahn Books, 309–20.Google Scholar
- Kreis, Georg 2009. ‘Pierre Nora besser verstehen — und kritisieren’, Historie: Jahrbuch des Zentrums fiir Historische Forschung Berlin der Polnischen Akademie der Wissenschaften 2, 103–17.Google Scholar
- Lotman, Yu M.; Uspensky, B. A. [1971] 1978. ‘On the Semiotic Mechanism of Culture’, trans. by George Mihaychuk. New Literary History 9, 2, 211–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Marx, Karl [1852] 1972. The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte. Moscow: Progress.Google Scholar
- Nora, Pierre (ed.) 1984–1992. Les lieux de mémoire, 7 vols. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
- Nora, Pierre 1989. ‘Between Memory and History: Les Lieux de Mémoire’, trans. by Marc Roudebush. Representations 26, 7–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Said, Edward D. 2000. ‘Invention, Memory, and Place’, Critical Inquiry 26, 2, 175–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sloterdijk, Peter 2002. Falls Europa erwacht: Gedanken zum Programm einer Weltmacht am Ende des Zeitalters ihrer politischen Absence. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
- Torpey, John 2004. ‘The Pursuit of the Past: A Polemical Perspective’, in Peter Seixas (ed.), Theorizing Historical Consciousness, Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 240–55.Google Scholar
- Torpey, John 2008. Making Whole What Has Been Smashed: On Reparation Politics. Cambridge, MA, and London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- ’The Nobel Peace Prize for 2012’ — Press Release, 15 October 2012. http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/peace/laureates/2012/press.html (29 October 2013).