Advertisement

Improving IB Learning through Multidisciplinary Simulations: Lessons from a Mock-Up of EU-US Trade Negotiations

  • Gabriele Suder
  • Mark T. Nance
  • Abigail Hall
Chapter

Abstract

Thirty years ago, Klein (1984) claimed the virtues of simulations for international business (IB) teaching in the Journal of International Business Studies. More recently, IB teaching has become increasingly innovative, for the benefit of students’ learning as well as for their exposure to applicable, or at least transposable, experiences that better prepare them with business-related competences for their future careers. Over a quarter of all business schools and 97.5% of Association Advance Collegiate Schools of Business (AACSB) -accredited schools have integrated simulations into their curricula (Faria, 1998). Yet most of these curricula use business simulations only, rather than multidisciplinary ones.

Keywords

Free Trade International Business Free Trade Agreement International Business Study Trade Negotiation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Appelman, R. (2005). Designing experiential modes: A key focus for immersive learning environments. TechTrends, 49(3): 64–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Clark, R. A., Gjerde, K. A. P. & Skinner, D. (2003). The effects of interdisciplinary instruction on simulation performance. Simulation & Gaming, 34(1): 150–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Faria, A. J. (1998). Business simulation games: Current usage level — An update. Simulation Gaming, September 1998, 295–308.Google Scholar
  4. Fayerweather, J. & Kapoor, A. (1972). Simulated international business negotiations. Journal of International Business Studies, 3(1): 19–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Frederking, B. (2005). Simulations and student learning. Journal of Political Science Education, 1(3): 385–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hardy, G. M. & Everett, D. L. (Eds.) (2013). Shaping the future of business education. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Klein, R. D. (1984). Adding international business to the core program via the simulation game. Journal of International Business Studies, 15: 151–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Klein, R. D. & Fleck, R. A. (1990). International business simulation/gaming: An assessment and review. Simulation & Gaming, 21(2): 147–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kolb, A. Y. & Kolb, D. (2005). Learning styles and learning spaces: Enhancing experiential learning in higher education. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4(2): 193–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lantis, J. S. (1998). Simulations and experiential learning in the international relations classroom. International Negotiation, 3(1): 39–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lean, J., Moizer, J., Towler, M. & Abbey, C. (2006). Simulations and games: Use and barriers in higher education. Active Learning in Higher Education, 7(3): 227–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lewicki, R. J. (1997). Teaching negotiation and dispute resolution in colleges and business: The state of the practice. Negotiation Journal, 13(3): 253–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lewis, M. M. (2005). The drama of international business. Journal of European Industrial Training, 29(7): 593–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Oblinger, D. (2004). The next generation of educational engagement. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 8. Retrieved from http://www-jime.open.ac.uk/jime/article/viewFile/2004–8-oblinger/199.
  15. Powner, L. C. & Allendoerfer, M. G. (2008). Evaluating hypotheses about active learning. International Studies Perspectives, 9: 75–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Raines, C. (2002). Managing millennials. Retrieved from http://www.generationsatwork.com/articles/millenials.htm.
  17. Shellman, S. M. & Turan, K. (2006.). Do simulations enhance student learning? An empirical evaluation of an IR simulation. Journal of Political Science Education, 2(1): 19–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Smith, E. T. & Boyer, M.A. (1996.). Designing in-class simulations. PS: Political Science and Politics, 29(4): 690–694.Google Scholar
  19. Suder, G. (2012). Doing business in Europe (2nd edition). London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  20. Xu, Y. & Yang, Y. (2010). Student learning in business simulation: An empirical investigation. Journal of Education for Business, 85(4): 223–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Gabriele Suder, Mark T. Nance, and Abigail Hall 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gabriele Suder
  • Mark T. Nance
  • Abigail Hall

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations