The Changing Role of Business in Global Society: Implications for Governance, Democracy, and the Theory of the Firm

  • Andreas Georg Scherer
  • Guido Palazzo
  • Hannah Trittin

Abstract

During the past decades business firms have started to engage in activities that have traditionally been regarded as actual governmental activities (Margolis & Walsh, 2003; Matten & Crane, 2005; Scherer & Palazzo, 2008a). This is especially true for multinational corporations (MNCs). They engage in public health, education, social security, and protection of human rights while often operating in countries with failed state agencies (Matten & Crane, 2005); address social ills such as AIDS, malnutrition, homelessness, and illiteracy (Margolis & Walsh, 2003; Rosen et al., 2003); define ethics codes (Cragg, 2005); protect the natural environment (Hart, 2005; Marcus & Fremeth, 2009); engage in self-regulation to fill global gaps in legal regulation and moral orientation (Scherer & Smid, 2000); and promote societal peace and stability (Fort & Schipani, 2004).

Keywords

Corporate Social Responsibility Business Ethic Corporate Governance Corporate Social Responsibility Activity Corporate Responsibility 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abbott, K. W., Keohane, R. O., Moravcik, A., Slaughter, A.-M. & Snidal, D. (2000). The concept of legalization. International Organization, 54(3), 17–35.Google Scholar
  2. Amaeshi, K. M., Osuji, O. K. & Nnodim, R (2007). Corporate social responsibility in supply chains of global brands: A boundaryless responsibility? Clarifications, exceptions and implications. Journal of Business Ethics, 81(1), 223–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Argenti, P. A. (2004). Collaborating with activists. How Starbucks works with NGOs. California Management Review, 47(1), 91–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arnold, D. G. & Bowie, N. E. (2003). Sweatshops and respect for persons. Business Ethics Quarterly, 13(2), 221–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Arnold, D. G. & Hartman, L. P. (2003). Moral imagination and the future of sweatshops. Business and Society Review, 108(4), 425–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ashforth, B. E. & Gibbs, B. W. (1990). The double-edge of organizational legitimation. Organization Science, 1(2), 177–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Aust, A. (2005). Handbook of international law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Avi-Yonah, R. S. (2000). Globalization, tax competition, and the fiscal crisis of the welfare state. Harvard Law Review, 113, 1575–676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bäckstrand, K. (2006). Multi-stakeholder partnerships for sustainable development: Rethinking legitimacy, accountability and efficiency. European Environment, 16, 290–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Banerjee, S. B. (2003). Who sustains whose development? Sustainable development and the reinvention of nature. Organization Studies, 24(1), 143–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Banerjee, S. B. (2007). Corporate social responsibility. The good, the bad and the ugly. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  12. Barber, B. R. (1996). Jihad versus McWorld. New York: Ballantine.Google Scholar
  13. Baron, D. P. (2003). Private politics. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 12(1), 31–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Baumann-Pauly, D. & Scherer, A. G. (2013). The organizational implementation of corporate citizenship: An assessment tool and its application at UN Global Compact participants. Journal of Business Ethics, 117(1), 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Beck, U. (2000). What is globalization? Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  16. Beck-Gernsheim, E. & Beck, U. (2002,). Individualization: Institutionalized individualism and its social and political consequences. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  17. Berger, P. L. & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality: A treatise on the sociology of knowledge. New York: Anchor.Google Scholar
  18. Blair, M. M. (1995). Ownership and control: Rethinking corporate governance for the 21st century. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
  19. Boddewyn, J. J. & Lundan, S. M. (2010). The internalization of societal institutions. Unpublished manuscript. New York.Google Scholar
  20. Bohman, J. & Rehg, W. (Eds.) (1997). Deliberative democracy: Essays on reason and politics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  21. Braithwaite, J. & Drahos, P. (2000). Global business regulation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Brenkert, G. G. (2009). Google, human rights and moral compromise. Journal of Business Ethics, 85(4), 453–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Carroll, A. B. (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Academy of Management Review, 4(4), 497–505.Google Scholar
  24. Carroll, A. B. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34(4), 39–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Castells, M. (1997). The power of identity. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  26. Chatterji, A. & Levine, D. (2006). Breaking down the wall of codes: Evaluating non-financial performance measurement. California Management Review, 48(2), 29–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Child, J. & Rodrigues, S. B. (2011). How organizations engage with external complexity: A political action perspective. Organization Studies, 32(6), 803–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Clapham, A. (2006). Human rights obligations of non-state actors. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Cohen, J. L. & Arato, A. (1994). Civil society and political theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  30. Cohen, R. & Kennedy, P. (2000). Global sociology. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  31. Cragg, W. (Ed.) (2005). Ethics codes, corporations and the challenge of globalization. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  32. Cutler, A. C. (2001). Critical reflections on the Westphalian assumptions of international law and organization: A crisis of legitimacy. Review of International Studies, 27(2), 133–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Dann, G. E. & Haddow, N. (2008). Just doing business or doing just business: Google, Microsoft, Yahoo! and the business of censoring China’s internet. Journal of Business Ethics, 79(3), 219–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Davis, G. F. (2009). The rise and fall of finance and the end of the society of organizations. Academy of Management Perspectives, 23(3), 27–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Davis, J. H., Schoorman, R D. & Donaldson, L. (1997). Toward a stewardship theory of management. Academy of Management Review, 22(1), 20–47.Google Scholar
  36. DeTienne, K. B. & Lewis, L. W. (2005). The pragmatic and ethical barriers to corporate social responsibility disclosure: The Nike case. Journal of Business Ethics, 60(4), 359–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Detomasi, D. A. (2007). The multinational corporation and global governance: Modelling global public policy networks. Journal of Business Ethics, 71(3), 321–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Dine, J. (2005). Companies, international trade and human rights. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Doh, J. P. (2005). Offshore outsourcing: Implications for international business and strategic management theory and practice. Journal of Management Studies, 42(3), 695–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Domask, J. (2003). From boycotts to global partnership: NGOs, the private sector, and the struggle to protect the world forests. In: J. P. Doh & H. Teegen (Eds.), Globalization and NGOs: Transforming business, government, and society (pp. 157–86). Westport, CT: Praeger Pub.Google Scholar
  41. Driver, C. & Thompson, G. (2002). Corporate governance and democracy: The stakeholder debate revisited. Journal of Management and Governance, 6(2), 111–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Dubbink, W. (2004). The fragile structure of free-market society. Business Ethics Quarterly, 14, 23–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Egels-Zandén, N. (2007). Suppliers’ compliance with MNCs codes of conduct: Behind the scenes at Chinese toy suppliers. Journal of Business Ethics, 75(1), 45–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Eisenberg, J. A. (1992). The limits of reason. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Elster, J. (1986). The market and the forum: Three varieties of political theory. In: J. Elster & A. Hylland (Eds.), Toundations of social choice theory (pp. 103–32). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Etzion, D. & Ferraro, F. (2010). The role of analogy in the institutionalization of sustainability reporting. Organization Science, 21(5), 1092–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Falk, R. (2002). Revisiting Westphalia, discovering Post-Westphalia. Journal of Ethics, 6(4), 311–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Fort, T. L. & Schipani, C. A. (2004). The role of business in fostering peaceful societies. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Freeman, J. (2000). The private role in public governance. New York University Law Review, 75(3), 543–675.Google Scholar
  50. Friedman, J. & Randeria, S. (Eds.) (2004). Worlds on the move: Globalisation, migration and cultural security. London: Tauris.Google Scholar
  51. Friedman, M. (1962). Capitalism and freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  52. Friedman, M. (1970). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profit. In: T. Donaldson & P. H. Werhane (Eds.), Ethical issues in business: A philosophical approach (pp. 217–23). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  53. Fukuyama, F. (2004). State building: Governance and world order in the 21st century. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  54. Garriga, E. & Melé, D. (2004). Corporate social responsibility theories: Mapping the territory. Journal of Business Ethics, 53(1–2), 51–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Giddens, A. (1990). Consequences of modernity. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  56. Gilbert, D. U. & Rasche, A. (2007). Discourse ethics and social accountability — The ethics of SA 8000. Business Ethics Quarterly, 17, 187–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Goldstein, J., Kahler, M., Keohane, R. O. & Slaughter, A.-M. (2000). Introduction: Legalization and world politics. International Organization, 54(3), 1–15.Google Scholar
  58. Gond, J.-P. & Herrbach, O. (2006). Social reporting as an organisational learning tool? A theoretical framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 65(4), 359–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Greenwood, R., Raynard, M., Kodeih, F., Micoletta, E. R. & Loundbury, M. (2011). Institutional complexity and organizational response. Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), 317–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Gross, L. (1948). The peace of Westphalia, 1648–1948. American Journal of International Law, 42, 20–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Gutman, A. & Thompson, D. F. (1996). Democracy and disagreement. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
  62. Gutman, A. & Thompson, D. F. (2004). Why deliberative democracy? Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  63. Haack, P., Schoeneborn, D. & Wickert, C. (2012). Talking the talk, moral entrapment, creeping commitment? Exploring narrative dynamics in corporate responsibility standardization. Organization Studies, 33(5–6), 815–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Habermas, J. (1996). Between facts and norms: Contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  65. Habermas, J. (1998). Three normative models of democracy. In: J. Habermas (Ed.), The inclusion of the other: Studies in political theory (pp. 239–52). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  66. Habermas, J. (2001). The postnational constellation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  67. Hale, T. & Held, D. (2011). Handbook on transnational governance: New institutions and innovations. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  68. Hart, S. L. (2005). Capitalism at the crossroads: The unlimited business opportunities in solving the world’s most difficult problems. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Wharton School.Google Scholar
  69. Haufler, V. (2001). A public role for the private sector: Industry self-regulation in a global economy. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.Google Scholar
  70. Held, D., McGrew, A., Goldblatt, D. & Perraton, J. (1999). Global transformation. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  71. Henderson, D. (2001). Misguided virtue: Talse notions of corporate social responsibility. London: Institute of Economic Affairs.Google Scholar
  72. Hess, D. (2001). Regulating corporate social performance — A new look at social accounting, auditing, and reporting. Business Ethics Quarterly, 11, 307–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Hess, D. (2007). Social reporting and new governance regulation: The prospects of achieving corporate accountability through transparency. Business Ethics Quarterly, 17, 453–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Hess, D. (2008). The three pillars of corporate social reporting as new governance regulation: Disclosure, dialogue, and development. Business Ethics Quarterly, 18, 447–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Hillman, A. J., Keim, G. D. & Schuler, D. (2004). Corporate political activity: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 30(6), 837–57.Google Scholar
  76. Hsieh, N. (2004). The obligations of transnational corporations: Rawlsian justice and the duty of assistance. Business Ethics Quarterly, 14, 643–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Hunter, M. L., Le Menestrel, M. & de Bettignies, H.-C. (2008). Beyond control: Crisis strategies and stakeholder media in the Danone Boycott of 2001. Corporate Reputation Review, 11(4), 335–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Jensen, M. C. (2002). Value maximization, stakeholder theory, and the corporate objective function. Business Ethics Quarterly, 12, 235–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Jensen, M. C. & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Jones, T. M. (1995). Instrumental stakeholder theory: A synthesis of ethics and economics. Academy of Management Review, 20(2), 404–37.Google Scholar
  81. Jones, M. T. & Fleming, P. (2003). Unpacking complexity through critical stakeholder analysis. The case of globalization. Business & Society, 42(4), 430–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Kaul, L, Conceição, P., Le Goulven, K. & Mendoza, R. U. (Eds.) (2003). Providing global public goods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  83. Keim, G. D. (2001). Business and public policy. Competing in the political marketplace. In: M. Hitt, R. E. Freeman, R. Edward & J. S. Harrison (Eds.), Handbook of strategic management (pp. 583–601). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  84. Kell, G. & Levin, D. (2003). The Global Compact network — An historic experiment in learning and action. Business and Society Review, 108(2), 151–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Khan, F. R., Munir, K. A. & Willmott, H. (2007). A dark side of institutional entre-preneurship: Soccer balls, child labour and postcolonial impoverishment. Organization Studies, 28(7), 1055–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Kingsbury, B. (2003). The international legal order. In: P. Cane & M. V. Tushnet (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of legal studies (pp. 271–97). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  87. Kinley, D. & Tadaki, J. (2004). From talk to walk: The emergence of human rights responsibilities for corporations at international law. Virginia Journal of International Law, 44(4), 931–1022.Google Scholar
  88. Kobrin, S. J. (2001). Sovereignty@bay: Globalization, multinational enterprise, and the international political system. In: A. M. Rugman & T. L. Brewer (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of international business (pp. 181–205). New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Kobrin, S.J. (2008). Globalization, transnational corporations, and the future of global governance. In: A. G. Scherer & G. Palazzo (Eds.), Handbook of research on global corporate citizenship (pp. 249–72). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  90. Kobrin, S. J. (2009). Private political authority and public responsibility: Transnational politics, transnational firms and human rights. Business Ethics Quarterly, 19, 349–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Koenig-Archibugi, M. (2005). Transnational corporations and public accountability. In: D. Held & M. Koenig-Archibugi (Eds.), Global governance and public accountability (pp. 110–35). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  92. Kolk, A. & van Tulder, R. (2002). The effectiveness of self-regulation: Corporate codes of conduct and child labor. European Management Journal, 20(3), 260–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Kostova, T. & Zaheer, S. (1999). Organizational legitimacy under conditions of complexity: The case of the multinational enterprise. Academy of Management Review, 24(1), 64–81.Google Scholar
  94. Kwok, C. C. Y. & Tadesse, S. (2006). National culture and financial systems. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(2), 227–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Laufer, W. S. (2003). Social accountability and corporate greenwashing. Journal of Business Ethics, 43(3), 253–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Le Menestrel, M., van den Hove, S. & de Bettignies, H.-C. (2002). Processes and consequences in business ethical dilemmas: The oil industry and climate change. Journal of Business Ethics, 41(2), 251–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Levy, D. (2008). Political contestation in global production networks. Academy of Management Review, 33(4), 943–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Levy, D. & Egan, D. (2003). A neo-Gramscian approach to corporate political strategy: Conflict and accommodation in the climate change negotiations. Journal of Management Studies, 40(4), 222–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Locke, R. M., Amengual, M. & Mangla, A. (2009). Virtue out of necessity? Compliance, commitment, and the improvement of labor conditions in global supply chains. Politics and Society, 37(3), 319–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Locke, R. M., Qin, F & Brause, A. (2007). Does monitoring improve labor standards? Lessons from Nike. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 61, 3–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Logsdon, J. M. & Wood, D. J. (2002). Business citizenship: From domestic to global level of analysis. Business Ethics Quarterly, 12, 155–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Lundan, S. M. (2012). The new eclectic paradigm and international business strategy. In: A. Verbeke & H. Merchant (Eds.), Handbook of research on international strategy management (pp. 64–76), Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Maak, T. & Pless, N. M. (2006). Responsible leadership in a stakeholder society. Journal of Business Ethics, 66(1), 99–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Mackey, A., Mackey, T. B. & Barney, J. B. (2007). Corporate social responsibility and firm performance: Investor relations and corporate strategies. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 817–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Marcus, A. A. & Fremeth, A. R. (2009). Green management matters regardless. Academy of Management Perspectives, 23(3), 17–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Margolis, J. D. & Walsh, J. P. (2001). People and profits? The search for a link between a company’s social and financial performance. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  107. Margolis, J. D. & Walsh, J. P. (2003). Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(2), 268–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Matten, D. & Crane, A. (2005). Corporate citizenship: Towards an extended theoretical conceptualization. Academy of Management Review, 30(1), 166–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. McBarnet, D., Voiculescu, A. & Campbell, T. (Eds.) (2007). The new corporate accountability: Corporate social responsibility and the law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  110. McWilliams, A. & Siegel, D. (2001). Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 117–27.Google Scholar
  111. McWilliams, A., Siegel, D. & Wright, P. M. (2006). Corporate social responsibility: Strategic implications. Journal of Management Studies, 43(1), 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Misangyi, V. F, Weaver, G. R. & Elms, H. (2008). Ending corruption: The interplay among institutional logics, resources, and institutional entrepreneurs. Academy of Management Review, 33(3), 750–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Moon, J., Crane, A. & Matten, D. (2005). Can corporations be citizens? Corporate citizenship as a metaphor for business participation in society. Business Ethics Quarterly, 15, 429–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Mörth, U. (Ed.) (2004). Soft law in governance and regulation: An interdisciplinary analysis. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  115. Muchlinski, P. T. (2007). Multinational enterprises and the law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Oliver, C. (1996). The institutional embeddedness of economic activity. Advances in Strategic Management, 13, 163–86.Google Scholar
  117. Orts, E. W. (1995). The legitimacy of multinational corporations. In: L. E. Mitchell (Ed.), Progressive corporate law (pp. 247–79). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  118. Oslander, A. (2001). Sovereignty, international relations, and the Westphalian myth. International Organization, 55(2), 251–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Pache, A.-C. & Santos, F. (2010). When worlds collide: The internal dynamics of organizational responses to conflicting institutional demands. Academy of Management Review, 35(3), 455–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Palan, R. (2003). The offshore world. Sovereign markets, virtual places, and nomad millionaires. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  121. Palazzo, G. & Richter, U. (2005). CSR business as usual? The case of the tobacco industry. Journal of Business Ethics, 61(4), 387–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. Palazzo, G. & Scherer, A. G. (2006). Corporate legitimacy as deliberation. A communicative framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 66(1), 71–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Palazzo, G. & Scherer, A. G. (2008). Corporate social responsibility, democracy, and the politicization of the corporation. Academy of Management Review, 33(3), 773–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. Parker, C. (2002). The open corporation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. Parker, C. & Braithwaite, J. (2003). Regulation. In: P. Cane & M. V. Tushnet (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of legal studies (pp. 119–45). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  126. Pattberg, P. (2005). What role for private rule-making in global environmental governance? Analysing the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC). International Environmental Agreements, 5(2), 175–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. Perrow, C. (2009). Modeling firms in the global economy. Theory and Society, 38(3), 217–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. Peters, F. (2004). Choice, consent, and the legitimacy of market transactions. Economics and Philosophy, 20(1), 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. Pies, I., Hielscher, S. & Beckmann, M. (2009). Moral commitments and the societal role of business: An ordonomic approach to corporate citizenship. Business Ethics Quarterly, 19(3), 372–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  130. Porter, M. E. & Kramer, M. R. (2006). Strategy and society: The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 84(12), 78–92.Google Scholar
  131. Reinicke, W. H., Deng, F., Witte, J. M., Benner, T., Whitaker, B. & Gershman, J. (2000). Critical choices: The United Nations, networks, and the future of global governance. Ottawa: International Development Research Centre.Google Scholar
  132. Risse, T. (2002). Transnational actors and world politics. In: W. Carlsnaes, T. Risse & B. Simmons (Eds.), Handbook of international relations (pp. 255–74). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  133. Roach, B. (2005). A primer on multinational corporations. In: A. D. Chandler & B. Mazlish (Eds.), Leviathans. Multinational corporations and the new global history (pp. 19–44). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  134. Rondinelli, D. A. (2002). Transnational corporations: International citizens or new sovereigns? Business and Society Review, 107, 391–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  135. Rorty, R. (1991). The priority of democracy to philosophy. In: R. Rorty (Ed.), Objectivity, relativism, and truth: Philosophical papers, Vol. I (pp. 175–96). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  136. Rosen, S., Simon, J., Vincent, MacLeod, J. R., Fox, W. M. & Thea, D. M. (2003). AIDS is your business. Harvard Business Review, 81(2), 80–97.Google Scholar
  137. Santoro, M. A. (2003). Beyond codes of conduct and monitoring: An organizational integrity approach to global labor practices. Human Rights Quarterly, 25(2), 407–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  138. Santoro, M. A. (2009). China 2020. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  139. Santoro, M. A. (2010). Post-Westphalia and its discontents: Business, globalization, and human rights in political and moral perspective. Business Ethics Quarterly, 20(2), 285–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  140. Schepers, D. H. (2010). Challenges to legitimacy at the Forest Stewardship Council. Journal of Business Ethics, 92(2), 279–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  141. Scherer, A. G., Baumann-Pauly D. & Schneider, A. (2013b). Democratizing corporate governance. Compensating for the democratic deficit of corporate political activity and corporate citizenship. Business & Society, 52(3), 473–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  142. Scherer, A. G. & Palazzo, G. (2007). Toward a political conception of corporate responsibility. Business and society seen from a Habermasian perspective. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1096–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  143. Scherer, A. G. & Palazzo, G. (Eds.) (2008a). Handbook of research on global corporate citizenship. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  144. Scherer, A. G. & Palazzo, G. (2008b). Globalization and corporate social responsibility. In: A. Crane, A. McWilliams, D. Matten, J. Moon & D. Siegel (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of corporate social responsibility (pp. 413–31). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  145. Scherer, A. G., Palazzo, G. & Baumann, D. (2006). Global rules and private actors. Towards a new role of the TNC in global governance. Business Ethics Quarterly, 16, 502–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  146. Scherer, A. G., Palazzo, G. & Matten, D. (2009). Introduction to the special issue: Globalization as a challenge for business responsibilities. Business Ethics Quarterly, 19, 327–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  147. Scherer, A. G., Palazzo, G. & Seidl, D. (2013a). Managing legitimacy in complex and heterogeneous environments: Sustainable development in a globalized world. Journal of Management Studies, 50(2), 259–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  148. Scherer, A. G. & Smid, M. (2000). The downward spiral and the U.S. Model Principles. Why MNEs should take responsibility for the improvement of world-wide social and environmental conditions. Management International Review, 40, 351–71.Google Scholar
  149. Scholte, J. A. (2005). Globalization: A critical introduction. New York: Palgrave-Macmillan.Google Scholar
  150. Schrage, E.J. & Ewing, A. P. (2005). The cocoa industry and child labour. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 18, 99–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  151. Schreyögg, G. & Sydow, J. (2010). Organizing for fluidity? Dilemmas of organizational forms. Organization Science, 21(6), 1251–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  152. Sethi, S. P. (2008). Defining the concept of good corporate citizenship in the context of globalization: A paradigm shift from corporate social responsibility to corporate social accountability. In: A. G. Scherer & G. Palazzo (Eds.), Handbook of research on global corporate citizenship (pp. 74–98). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  153. Shamir, R. (2004). Between self-regulation and the alien tort claims act: On the contested concept of corporate social responsibility. Law & Society Review, 38(4), 635–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  154. Shelton, D. (Ed.) (2000). Commitment and compliance: The role of non-binding norms in the international legal system. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  155. Siegel, D. S. (2009). Green management matters only if it yields more green: An economic/strategic perspective. Academy of Management Perspectives, 23(3), 5–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  156. Spar, D. L. (1998). The spotlight and the bottom line. How multinationals export human rights. Foreign Affairs, 77(2), 7–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  157. Spar, D. L. & La Mure, L. T. (2003). The power of activism: Assessing the impact of NGOs on global business. California Management Review, 45(3), 78–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  158. Steinmann, H. (2007). Corporate ethics and globalization — Global rules and private actors. In: G. Hanekamp (Ed.), Business ethics of innovation (pp. 7–26). Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  159. Stone, C. D. (1975). Where the law ends. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  160. Strand, R. (1983). A systems paradigm of organizational adaptations to the social environment. Academy of Management Review, 8(1), 90–6.Google Scholar
  161. Strange, S. (1996). The retreat of the state and the diffusion of power in the world economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  162. Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610.Google Scholar
  163. Suddaby, R. & Greenwood, R. (2005). Rhetorical strategies of legitimacy. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(1), 35–67.Google Scholar
  164. Sundaram, A. K. & Inkpen, A. C. (2004). The corporate objective revisited. Organization Science, 25(3), 350–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  165. Swanson, D. L. (1999). Toward an integrative theory of business and society: A research strategy for corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 24(3), 506–21.Google Scholar
  166. Taylor, K. M. (2004). Thicker than blood: Holding Exxon Mobil liable for human rights violations committed abroad. Syracuse Journal of International Law and Commerce, 31(2), 274–97.Google Scholar
  167. Teegen, H., Doh, J. P. & Vachani, S. (2004). The importance of nongovernmental organizations in global governance and value creation: An international business research agenda. Journal of International Business Studies, 35(6), 463–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  168. Teubner, G. (Ed.) (1997). Global law without a state. Aldershot, UK: Dartmouth Publishing.Google Scholar
  169. Utting, P. (2002). Regulating business via multi-stakeholders initiatives: A preliminary assessment. Geneva: UNRISD.Google Scholar
  170. Vaara, E. & Tienari, J. (2008). A discursive perspective on legitimation strategies in multinational corporations. Academy of Management Review, 33(4), 985–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  171. Vagts, D. F. (2003). The UN norms for transnational corporations. Leiden Journal of International Law, 16(4), 795–802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  172. van Oosterhout, J. H. (2008). Transcending the confines of political and economic organization: The misguided metaphor of corporate citizenship. Business Ethics Quarterly, 18, 35–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  173. van Oosterhout, J. H. (2010). The role of corporations in shaping the global rules of the game: In search of new foundations. Business Ethics Quarterly, 20, 253–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  174. van Tulder, R. & Kolk, A. (2001). Multinationality and corporate ethics: Codes of conduct in the sporting goods industry. Journal of International Business Studies, 32(2), 267–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  175. Vogel, D. J. (2005). Is there a market for virtue? The business case for corporate social responsibility. California Management Review, 47(4), 19–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  176. Vogel, D. J. (2007). Private global business regulation. Annual Review of Political Science, 11, 261–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  177. Vögtlin, C, Patzer, M. & Scherer, A. G. (2012). Responsible leadership in global business: A new approach to leadership and its multi-level outcomes. Journal of Business Ethics, 205(1), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  178. Waddock, S. (2008). Building a new institutional infrastructure for corporate responsibility. Academy of Management Perspectives, 22(3), 87–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  179. Walsh, J. P. (2005). Book review essay: Taking stock of stakeholder management. Academy of Management Review, 30(2), 426–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  180. Weissbrodt, D. & Kruger, M. (2003). Norms on the responsibilities of transnational corporations and other business enterprises with regard to human rights. The American Journal of International Law, 97(4), 901–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  181. Were, M. (2003). Implementing corporate responsibility — The Chiquita case. Journal of Business Ethics, 44(2–3), 247–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  182. Wettstein, F. (2010). For better or for worse: Corporate responsibility beyond ‘do no harm’. Business Ethics Quarterly, 20(2), 275–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  183. Wheeler, D., Fabig, H. & Boele, R. (2002). Paradoxes and dilemmas for stakeholder responsive firms in the extractive industry: Lessons from the case of Shell and the Ogoni. Journal of Business Ethics, 39(3), 297–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  184. Whetton, D. A. & Mackey, A. (2002). A social actor conception of organizational identity and its implications for the study of organizational reputation. Business & Society, 41(4), 393–414.Google Scholar
  185. Williams, O. F. (2004). The UN Global Compact: The challenge and the promise. Business Ethics Quarterly, 14, 755–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  186. Willis, A. (2003). The role of the global reporting initiative’s sustainability reporting guidelines in the social screening of investments. Journal of Business Ethics, 43(3), 233–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  187. Windsor, D. (2006). Corporate social responsibility: Three key approaches. Journal of Management Studies, 43(3), 93–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  188. Young, I. M. (2008). Responsibility and global justice: A social connection model. In: A. G. Scherer & G. Palazzo (Eds.), Handbook of research on global corporate citizenship (pp. 137–65). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  189. Yu, X. (2008). Impacts of corporate code of conduct on labor standards: A case study of Reebok’s athletic footwear supplier factory in China. Journal of Business Ethics, 81(3), 513–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  190. Zadek, S. (2004). The path to corporate responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 82(12), 125–32.Google Scholar
  191. Zerk, J. A. (2006). Multinationals and corporate social responsibility. Limitations and opportunities in international law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  192. Zürn, M. (2002). From interdependence to globalization. In: W. Carlsnaes, T. Risse & B. Simmons (Eds.), Handbook of international relations (pp. 235–54). London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  193. Zwolinski, M. (2007). Sweatshops, choice, and exploitation. Business Ethics Quarterly, 17, 689–727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  194. Zyglidopoulos, S. C. (2002). The social and environmental responsibilities of multinationals: Evidence from the Brent Spar case. Journal of Business Ethics, 36(1–2), 141–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Andreas Georg Scherer, Guido Palazzo, and Hannah Trittin 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andreas Georg Scherer
  • Guido Palazzo
  • Hannah Trittin

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations