Dominance in the Neighborhood: Turkey and Iran

  • Melody Mohebi
Part of the Palgrave Macmillan Series in Global Public Diplomacy book series (GPD)

Abstract

Public diplomacy represents efforts to connect with the public of another country, not just by governments but also by other entities such as nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) and corporations.1 Public diplomacy goes hand-in-hand with soft power. Soft power, which “rests on the ability to shape the preferences of others,”2 plays a vital role in guiding and reinforcing the different elements of diplomacy and bilateral relationships. According to Joseph Nye, “[Soft power] is the ability to get what you want through attraction rather than coercion or payments. It arises from the attractiveness of a country’s culture, political ideals, and policies. When our policies are seen as legitimate in the eyes of others, our soft power is enhanced.”3 Soft power embodies a more cost-effective means of reaching a desired goal. However, obtaining soft power requires strategic planning and the dedication of resources by the entity seeking it, whether it is a government or not. In this respect, Turkey and Iran, as two major regional powers, not only compete for regional political access but have also had a cultural rivalry for centuries based on religious and ethnic divides. This chapter explores Turkey and Iran from a public diplomacy perspective with an emphasis on travel and television.

Keywords

Asylum Seeker Soft Power Iranian Government Iraqi Refugee Turkish Economic 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    Philip Seib, “Public Diplomacy, New Media, and Counterterrorism,” CPD Perspectives on Public Diplomacy no. 2 (2011: 6.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Joseph S. Nye, Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics (New York: PublicAffairs, 2004), p. 5.Google Scholar
  3. 4.
    Katinka Barysch, “Can Turkey Combine EU Accession and Regional Leadership?” Centre for European Reform Policy Brief (2010), p. 7.Google Scholar
  4. 5.
    Robert Olson, “The Azeri’ Question and Turkey-Iran Relations, 2000–2002,” Nationalism and Ethnic Politics 8, no. 4 (2007): 81–82.Google Scholar
  5. 6.
    Bijan Khajehpour, “Five Trends in Iran-Turkey Trade, Energy Ties,” Al Monitor, October 31, 2013. http://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/originals/2013/10/iran-turkey-trade-energy-ties-increase-five-reasons.htmlGoogle Scholar
  6. 7.
    Bulent Aliriza and Stephen J. Flanagan, “Turkey’s Evolving Relations with Russia and Iran,” in The Turkey, Russia, Iran Nexus: Driving Forces and Strategies (Abbreviated Edition), (Washington, DC: Center for Strategic and International Studies, 2013), p. 8.Google Scholar
  7. 9.
    Daniel Dombey and Najmeh Borzorgmehr, “Rouhani’s Visit to Ankara Lifts Hopes for Turkey Iran Thaw,” Financial Times, June 9, 2014.Google Scholar
  8. 12.
    Yoruk and Vatikiotis provide a number of relevant details and references on this topic in Zafer Yoruk and Pantelis Vatikiotis, “Soft Power or Illusion of Hegemony: The Case of the Turkish Soap Opera ‘Colonialism’.” International Journal of Communication7 (2013): 2361–2385.Google Scholar
  9. 13.
    Hakan Altinay, “Turkey’s Soft Power: An Unpolished Gem or an Elusive Mirage?” Insight Turkey 10, no. 2 (2008): 59, 65.Google Scholar
  10. 16.
    Harry Van Versendaal, “New Tool for Female Empowerment: Turkish Soap Operas,” Ekathimerini. March 16, 2014.Google Scholar
  11. 17.
    Paul Salem, Turkey’s Image in the Arab World (Istanbul: Turkish Economic and Social Studies Foundation, 2011), p. 6.Google Scholar
  12. 18.
    Mathieu Rousselin, “Strategic Depth through Soft Power: The Domestic Production and International Projection of Turkish Culture,” Euxeinos: Online Journal of the Center for Governance and Culture in Europe 10 (2013): 3.Google Scholar
  13. 21.
    Ahu Yigit, “Turkish Drama in the Middle East: Secularism and Cultural Influence,” European Institute of the Mediterranean (2013), pp. 292–293.Google Scholar
  14. 22.
    Mathiew Rousselin, “Turkish Soap Power: International Perspectives and Domestic Paradoxes,” Euxeinos: Online Journal of the Center for Governance and Culture in Europe 10 (2013).Google Scholar
  15. 27.
    Selcen Öner, “Soft Power in Turkish Foreign Policy: New Instruments and Challenges,” Euxeinos: Governance and Culture in the Black Sea Region no. 10 (2013): 11.Google Scholar
  16. 32.
    Kemal Kirişçi, “Turkey: A Transformation from Emigration to Immigration,” Migration Information Source (The Online Journal of the Migration Policy Institution) (November 1, 2003).Google Scholar
  17. 34.
    International Catholic Migration Commission (ICMC), “Welcome to Europe! A Comprehensive Guide to Resettlement,” July 2013., http://www.resettlement.eu/sites/icmc.tttp.eu/files/ICMC%20Europe-Welcome%20to%20Europe_0.pdf.Google Scholar
  18. 35.
    European Resettlement Network, “Iranian and Iraqi Refugees in Turkey,” 2013, http://www.resettlement.eu/page/iranian-iraqi-refugees-turkey.Google Scholar
  19. 36.
    Ramin Asadi and Mahmoud Daryaei, “Prioritization of Pull Factors of Turkey as a Destination for Iranian Tourists,” Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences 5, no. 10 (2011): 1510–1515.Google Scholar
  20. 41.
    Mensur Akgun, Sabiha Senyucel Gundogar, “The Perception of Turkey in the Middle East 2012,” trans. Jonathan Levack (Istanbul: Turkish Economic and Social Studies Foundation, 2012), p. 20.Google Scholar
  21. 43.
    Sahin Alpay, “Iran-Turkey Relations: Love Thy Neighour?” Al Jazeera, February 12, 2014, http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/opinion/2014/02/iran-turkey-relations-love-thy-ne-2014211671992287.html.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© B. Senem Çevik and Philip Seib 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Melody Mohebi

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations