Abstract
Utopian political writing has a long history, dating back to, perhaps, Plato’s Republic. Traditionally, utopian political writing attempts to depict a just political arrangement, and by doing so, presents a tacit critique of social and political conditions that differ significantly from the ideal society depicted. Thomas More’s Utopia and Edward Bellamy’s Looking Backward, and perhaps Plato’s Republic, are examples of this type of theoretical engagement. But other theoretical strategies — those which attempt to define the principles and justification for legitimate political, legal, and moral activity antecedent to any particular situation — are utopian in a different way. These types of theoretical endeavors begin in overly abstract scenarios and often ignore actual cultural context. The particularities of place and time are marginalized in favor of abstract justifications of first principles. Political, legal, and moral principles, then used as justification for a substantive program, appear to be ahis-torical but attempt a sort of logical perfection. These begin not with custom, experience, taste, and prejudice, nor with the sentimental induction summarizing our collective experience, but with first principles and imaginary scenarios. Those Enlightenment political figures discussed in Chapter 1, Hobbes, Locke, Paine, Rousseau, and Kant, each conceived of a mythical, imaginary beginning in the state of nature to begin their inquiries into the essence of legitimate political authority and just legislation.
Keywords
Deliberative Democracy Epistemic Norm Comprehensive Doctrine Critical Race Theory Democratic TheoryPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
- * Nöel O’Sullivan, (1976) Conservatism, (London: JM Dent and Sons), p. 22.Google Scholar
- 1.John Rawls, (2003) A Theory of Justice, Revised Edition, (Cambridge: Harvard University Press) p. 18.Google Scholar
- 2.Richard Posner, (1999) The Problematics of Moral and Legal Theory, (Cambridge: Harvard University Press) p. 51.Google Scholar
- 3.Thomas Nagel presented a similar critique. Thomas Nagel, (1973) “Rawls on Justice,” Philosophical Review, 82(2), pp. 220–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.Judith Jarvis Thomson, (2006) “A Defense of Abortion,” in Contemporary Moral Problems, Ed. James E. White, Eighth Edition, (United States: Thomson Wadsworth) p. 105.Google Scholar
- 11.H.L.A. Hart, (1958) “Positivism and Separation of Law and Morals,” Harvard Law Review, 71(4), pp. 593–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Ibid., p. 610. Hart is referring to Sir William Blackstone, The Commentaries of Sir William Blackstone, Knt. on the Laws and Constitution of England, (London: Elibron Classics, 2005).Google Scholar
- 15.Ronald Dworkin, (2007) “The Model of Rules,” in Readings in the Philosophy of Law, Ed. Keith Culver, 2nd Edition (Broadview Press) p. 153.Google Scholar
- 17.Ronald Dworkin, (1986) Law’s Empire, (Cambridge: Harvard University Press) p. 227.Google Scholar
- 22.Robert B Talisse, (2009) Democracy and Moral Conflict, (New York: Cambridge University Press) pp. 64–68, 111–113,CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- cited by Simon Căbulea May, Review of Robert B Talisse, (2009) Democracy and Moral Conflict in Ethics, 121(3), pp. 685–690.Google Scholar
- 23.Robert B. Talisse, (2004) “Introduction: Pragmatism and Deliberative Politics,” Journal of Speculative Philosophy, 18(1), p. 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Talisse cites Jürgen Habermas, Between Facts and Norms, (Cambridge: MIT Press, 1996) p. 21.Google Scholar
- 24.Robert B. Talisse, (1996) A Pragmatist Philosophy of Democracy, (New York: Routledge) pp. 73–74.Google Scholar
- 25.Talisse, “Introduction: Pragmatism and Deliberative Politics,” p. 1–2. Talisse cites Michael Sandel, Democracy’s Discontents, (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1996) p. 6.Google Scholar
- 29.John Rawls, (2005) Political Liberalism, (New York: Columbia University Press) p. 4.Google Scholar
- 30.Robert B. Talisse, (2009) “Precis,” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 45(1), p. 46.Google Scholar
- 31.Robert B. Talisse, Democracy After Liberalism: Pragmatism and Deliberative Politics, (New York: Routledge, 2005) p. 103.Google Scholar
- Talisse cites Cheryl Misak, Truth, Politics, Morality. (New York: Routledge, 2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 33.Richard A. Posner, (2003) Law, Pragmatism, and Democracy, (Cambridge: Harvard University Press) p. 158.Google Scholar
- Posner cites Joseph Schumpeter, Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy, (New York: Harper & Brothers, 1942).Google Scholar
- 36.Richard A. Posner, (2003) Law, Pragmatism, and Democracy, (Cambridge: Harvard University Press) p. 182.Google Scholar
- 37.Colin Koopman, (2009) “Good Questions and Bad Answers in Talisse’s Pragmatist Philosophy of Democracy ,” Transactions of the Charles Sanders Peirce Society, 45(1), p. 62.Google Scholar
- 40.Michael Bacon, (2010) “The Politics of Truth: A Critique of Peircean Deliberative Democracy,” Philosophy and Social Criticism, 36(9), pp. 1075–1091.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 45.John Dewey, Ethics, Vol. 7 of The Later Works of John Dewey, Ed. Jo Ann Boydston, (Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1985) p. 348.Google Scholar
- Cited in William R. Caspary, (2000) Dewey on Democracy, (London: Cornell University Press) p. 13.Google Scholar
- 46.Cheryl Misak, The American Pragmatists, (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013), p. 35.Google Scholar
- 47.John Dewey, Human Nature and Conduct, Vol. 14 of The Middle Works of John Dewey. Ed. Jo Ann Boydston, (Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1983b), p. 46.Google Scholar
- 48.Dewey , “Creative Democracy—The Task Before Us,” in The Later Works of John Dewey, Vol. 14, Ed. Jo Ann Boydston, (Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1988e), p. 229.Google Scholar
- 49.John Dewey, Democracy and Education, Vol. 9 of The Middle Works of John Dewey, Ed. Jo Ann Boydston, (Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1980), p. 89.Google Scholar
- 52.John Dewey, Reconstruction in Philosophy, in The Midlle Works of John Dewey, Vol. 12, Ed. Jo Ann Boydston, (Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1982), p. 182.Google Scholar
- 61.Roger Scruton, (2002) The Meaning of Conservatism, (South Bend: St. Augustine’s Press) p. 32.Google Scholar
- 62.Michael Oakeshott, (1991) Rationalism in Politics and Other Essays, (Oxford: Liberty Fund) p. 411.Google Scholar
- 64.Louis Menand, (1997) ed., Pragmatism: A Reader, (New York: Vintage Books) p. xxi.Google Scholar
- 65.Roberto Unger, The Critical Legal Studies Movement, (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1986) p. 15.Google Scholar
- 68.Kimberly Crenshaw, Neil Gotanda, Gary Peller, and Kendall Thomas, eds., Critical Race Theory, (New York: The New Press, 1995) pp. xiv–xv.Google Scholar
- 69.Catherine MacKinnon, (2005) Women’s Lives, Men’s Laws, (Cambridge: Harvard University Press) p. 53.Google Scholar
- 71.See Michael Bacon, (2012) Pragmatism: An Introduction, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
- and Robert Talisse and Scott Aiken, eds., (2011) The Pragmatist Reader: From Peirce through the Present, (Princeton: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
- 72.See Menand A, ed., Pragmatism A Reader, Charlene Haddock Seigfried, Pragmatism and Feminism: Reweaving the Social Fabric, (Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
- Judy D. Whipps, (2004) “Jane Addams’s Social Thought as a Model for a Pragmatist-Feminist Communitarianism,” Hypatia, 19(2), pp. 118–133,CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- and Marilyn Fischer, (2006) “Jane Addams,” in A Companion to Pragmatism, Eds. John R. Shook and Joseph Margolis, (Oxford: Blackwell Publishing) pp. 79–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 77.Jean Bethke Elshtain, (2002) “Justice and Amelioration—Finding Democracy’s Middle Way,” in The Jane Addams Reader, Ed. Jean Bethke Elshtain, (New York: Basic Books) p. 114.Google Scholar
- 84.Jane Addams, “Women’s Conscience and Social Amelioration,” in The Jane Addams Reader, Ed. Jean Bethke Elshtain. (New York: Basic Books, 2002) p. 252.Google Scholar
- 85.Marilyn Fischer, (2013) “Reading Dewey’s Political Philosophy through Addams’s Political Compromises,” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly, 87(2), p. 227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 87.Ibid., p. 235. John Morley, On Compromise, (1874) (London: Chapman and Hall) p. 176.Google Scholar
- 91.Michael Oakeshott, (1993) “The Claims of Politics,” in Religion, Politics, and the Moral Life, Ed. Timothy Fuller, (New Haven: Yale University Press) p. 92.Google Scholar
- 94.See Aristotle , (2001) The Basic Works of Aristotle, Ed. Richard McKeon, (New York: The Modern Library) p. 942.Google Scholar
- 96.Michael Oakeshott, (1996) The Politics of Faith and the Politics of Skepticism, Ed. Timothy Fuller, (New Haven: Yale University Press) p. 23.Google Scholar
- 105.Michael Oakeshott, (2006) Lectures in the History of Political Thought, Eds Terry Nardin and Luke O’Sullivan. (London: Imprint Academic) p. 471.Google Scholar
- 109.Oliver Wendell Holmes, The Essential Holmes: Selections from the Letters, Speeches, Judicial Opinions, and Other Writings of Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., Ed. Richard Posner, (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992) p. 118.Google Scholar
- 112.“C.S. Peirce to Lady Victoria Welby, 23 December 1908,” in C.S. Hardwick, ed., Semiotics and Significs: The Correspondence between Charles Sanders Peirce and Lady Victoria Welby, (1977) (Bloomington: Indiana University Press) p. 78.Google Scholar
- 113.Blanshard , Reason and Goodness (London: George Allen and Unwin, 1961), p. 180.Google Scholar
- 116.John Dewey, “The Nature of Freedom,” in The Later Works of John Dewey, Vol. 13, Ed. Jo Ann Boydston, (Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1988a) p. 39.Google Scholar