US Poetry in the Age of Empire, 1979–2012 pp 33-51 | Cite as
“Beyond My Outrage or My Admiration”: Robert Pinsky’s An Explanation of America
Abstract
In 1964, Robert Lowell wrote a poem about the American empire at its peak. Titled “July in Washington,” the poem describes the US capital as the center of the world, a “wheel” whose spokes “touch the sore spots of the earth.” The United States has replaced the old colonial European powers, even while it competes with the Soviet Union for influence among undeveloped or politically unstable countries. But this global hegemon is not free of inner corruption. The equestrian statues that adorn the centers of traffic circles in Washington “ride like South American/liberators,” politicians arrive in the capital “bright as dimes” but “die disheveled and soft.” Throughout the poem, Lowell seems skeptical if not scornful of America’s expansionist impulse: “we wish the river had another shore/some farther range of delectable mountains.” 1 Indeed, this moment in US history already marks the beginning of its decline. The poem’s imagery suggests, in the words of one commentator, that “the new era will be one in which American civilization will sink back into the wilderness from which it sprang.” 2 In “July in Washington,” Lowell seems simultaneously entranced and repelled by the American empire; it is difficult to tell how he feels about it because throughout the poem he remains characteristically ambivalent.
Keywords
National Identity Fellow Citizen Knowledge Forum Traffic Circle American EmpirePreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
- 1.Robert Lowell, Collected Poems, ed. Frank Bidart and David Gewanter (New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2003 ), 366.Google Scholar
- 2.Stephen Yenser, Circle to Circle: The Poetry of Robert Lowell ( Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1975 ), 230.Google Scholar
- 3.James Longenbach, “Figuring Multitudes,” review of The Figured Wheel: New and Collected Poems, 1966–1996, by Robert Pinsky, The Nation (April 29, 1996): 25.Google Scholar
- 4.Mary Maxwell, “Exhilaration and Derangement,” Literary Imagination 6.2 (Spring 2004): 307.Google Scholar
- 5.For a comprehensive analysis of the Favorite Poem Project, see Joan Shelley Rubin, Songs of Ourselves: The Uses of Poetry in America ( Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2007 ), 381–404.Google Scholar
- 6.Robert Pinsky, The Figured Wheel: New and Collected Poems, 1966–1996 (New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 1996 ), 231.Google Scholar
- 8.David Harvey, A Brief History of Neoliberalism ( New York: Oxford University Press, 2005 ), 1–2.Google Scholar
- 10.Robert Pinsky, “A Q&A Session with Robert Pinsky,” Smartish Pace, January 2001,www.smartishpace.com/home/poetsqa/pinsky_answers.htm.Google Scholar
- 11.Robert Pinsky, An Explanation of America (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1979), 6. All subsequent citations to this volume are indicated as EA in the text.Google Scholar
- 13.Robert Archambeau, Laureates and Heretics: Six Careers in American Poetry (Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 2010), 67 and 77.Google Scholar
- 14.Robert Pinsky, The Situation of Poetry: Contemporary Poetry and Its Traditions (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1977), 133–34. One of the poets Pinsky identifies as discursive is Lowell, specifically in his unrhymed sonnets and his “wish to discourse fully about a variety of subjects—and not mere length, not a wish to be ‘large’” (ibid., 134).Google Scholar
- 17.Wallace Stevens, Collected Poetry and Prose ( New York: Library of America, 1997 ), 728–29.Google Scholar
- 19.Jean Baudrillard, America, trans. Chris Turner (New York: Verso, 1988 ), 54.Google Scholar
- 21.Ernst Renan, “What Is a Nation?” trans. Martin Thom, in Nation and Narration, ed. Homi Bhabha (New York: Routledge, 1990), 18. As Renan famously remarks, “No French citizen knows whether he is a Burgundian, an Alan, a Taifale, or a Visigoth, yet every French citizen has to have forgotten the massacre of Saint Bartholomew or the massacres that took place in the Midi in the thirteenth century” (ibid., 11).Google Scholar
- 23.Marshall Toman, “Pinsky’s An Explanation ofAmerica,” The Explicator 42.3 (1984): 62–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.R. W. B. Lewis, The American Adam: Innocence, Tragedy, and Tradition in the Nineteenth Century ( Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1955 ), 5.Google Scholar
- 25.Willa Cather, My Ántonia ( 1918; reprint, New York: Penguin, 1994 ), 139.Google Scholar
- 29.Robert Pinsky, Poetry and the World ( New York: Ecco Press, 1988 ), 128.Google Scholar
- 36.Robert Pinsky, “The Art of Poetry,” interview by Ben Downing and Daniel Kunitz, Paris Review 144 (Fall 1997): 55.Google Scholar
- 40.Robert Pinsky, “Eros against Esperanto,” in For Love of Country: Debating the Limits of Patriotism. Martha C. Nussbaum with Respondents, ed. Joshua Cohen (Boston: Beacon Press, 1996), 86. Pinsky’s essay was a response to Martha C. Nussbaum’s 1994 Boston Review article “Patriotism and Cosmopolitanism” in which she puts forward the idea of teaching American children to identify themselves primarily as members of world community. The article triggered responses from thinkers like Kwame Anthony Appiah, Judith Butler, Nathan Glazer, Hilary Putnam, Immanuel Wallerstein, and others, many of whom, like Pinsky, opposed what they consider her somewhat naive model of “cosmopolitan education.”Google Scholar
- 44.Paul Giles, The Global Remapping of American Literature ( Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2011 ), 260.Google Scholar
- 45.Robert Pinsky, “Poetry and American Memory,” Atlantic Monthly (October 1999): 60–61.Google Scholar
- 48.Robert Pinsky, Democracy, Culture, and the Voice of Poetry ( Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2004 ), 76–77.Google Scholar
- 49.Robert Archambeau, The Poet Resigns: Poetry in a Difficult World (Akron: University of Akron Press, 2013), 95. On poets and their self-appointed public role, see Archambeau’s chapter “The Discursive Situation of Poetry” (ibid., 9–31).Google Scholar