Advertisement

The South China Sea Disputes: Whither a Solution?

  • Yang Fang

Abstract

The on-going disputes amongst China, Taiwan, Vietnam, Malaysia, the Philippines, and Brunei in the South China Sea have reached an impasse as a result of heightened tensions in recent years. The fact that they involve the concept of sovereignty and that none of the claimant parties are willing to make a compromise have added layers of complexity, preventing much progress from being achieved. This has made the prospect of resolution unlikely in the near future. This chapter evaluates existing approaches directed towards resolving the South China Sea disputes. It argues that a comprehensive and durable resolution of the disputes (especially those aspects concerning sovereignty) cannot be expected in the foreseeable future. It therefore suggests that claimant parties should focus on exploring ways for better management of the disputes.

Keywords

Foreign Affair Territorial Dispute Claimant State International Crisis Group Dispute Area 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Agence France Presse. (2 August 2010). US, Vietnam Start First Military Relationship. Retrieved 8 November 2013.Google Scholar
  2. Asia Times. (2 August 2013). Philippines, Vietnam Take China hedges. Retrieved 8 November 2013, from http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Southeast_Asia/SEA-01–020813.html.Google Scholar
  3. Association of Southeast Asian Nations. (n.d.). Declaration on the Conduct of Parties in the South China Sea. Retrieved 8 November 2013, from http://www.asean.org/asean/external-relations/china/item/declaration-on-the-conduct-of-parties-in-the-south-china-sea.Google Scholar
  4. Authority of Foreign Information Service. (9 August 2012). On the Fundamental Principle of Vietnam’s Marine Strategy in the 21st Century. Retrieved 7 November 2013, from http://vietnam.vn/on-the-fundamental-principle-of-vietnams-marine-strategy-in-the-21st-century--part-1-c1070n20120809153623812.htm.Google Scholar
  5. Bangkok Post. (16 September 2013). Asean, China to Speed Up Code of Conduct. Retrieved 8 November 2013, from http://www.bangkokpost.com/news/local/369881/asean-china-set-to-speed-up-code-of-conduct.Google Scholar
  6. Banlaoi, R. C. (7 December 2012). Functional Cooperation and Joint Development: A Way Ahead in the South China Sea. Paper presented at the International Conference on “Recent Development of the South China Sea Dispute and Prospects of Joint Development Regime” organised by the National Institute for South China Sea Studies (NISCSS). Haikou, Hainan, China.Google Scholar
  7. Bateman, S. (21 August 2012). Increasing Competition in the South China Sea — Need for a New Game Plan. RSIS Commentaries (157).Google Scholar
  8. Bateman, S., Ho, J., & Chan, J. (April 2009). Good Order at Sea in Southeast Asia. RSIS Policy Paper.Google Scholar
  9. Baviera, A. S. (5 June 2012). The Influence of Domestic Politics on Philippine Foreign Policy: The Case of Philippines-China Relations Since 2004. RSIS Working Paper (241).Google Scholar
  10. BBC. (10 June 2011). China Accuses Vietnam in South China Sea Row. Retrieved 7 November 2013, from http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-pacific-13723443.Google Scholar
  11. Beckman, R. (11–13 May 2005). Safety of Navigation in the Southeast Asian Seas. Paper Presented at the Joint Project Workshop: Security of the Ocean in Asia, 5th Science Council of Asia Conference. Hanoi.Google Scholar
  12. Beckman, R. C., & Bernard, L. (3–5 November 2011). Paper presentation on “Disputed Areas in the South China Sea: Prospects for Arbitration or Advisory Opinion.” Third International Conference on “The South China Sea: Cooperation for Regional Security and Development.” Melia Hotel, Honoi, Vietnam.Google Scholar
  13. Blanchard, B. (31 December 2012). China Says “Board and Search” Sea Rules Limited to Hainan Coast. Retrieved 5 November 2013, from Reuters: http://uk.reuters.com/article/2012/12/31/uk-china-seas-idUKBRE8BU03920121231.Google Scholar
  14. Brown, E. (1978). Rockall and the limits of national jurisdiction of the UK ☆: Part 1. Marine Policy, 2(3), 181–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Brownlie, I. (2003). Principles of Public International Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press (6th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Brunei Times. (25 December 2010). Deals Sorted, Good Year for Oil & Gas. Retrieved 8 November 2013, from http://www.bt.com.bn/business-national/2010/12/25/deals-sorted-good-year-oil-gas.Google Scholar
  17. Buszynski, L. (2010). Rising Tensions in the South China Sea: Prospects for a Resolution of the Issue. Security Challenges, 6(2), 101–102.Google Scholar
  18. Catley B., & Keliat, M. (1997). Spratlys: The Dispute in the South China Sea. Singapore and Sydney: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  19. Channel NewsAsia. (1 February 2013). “The Sooner, the Better” for COC on South China Sea: Shanmugam. Retrieved 8 November 2013, from http://www.chan-nelnewsasia.com/stories/singaporelocalnews/view/1251609/1/.html.Google Scholar
  20. Charney J. I. (1999). Rocks That Cannot Sustain Human Habitation. American Journal of International Law, 93(4), 863–877.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Cheng-yi, L. (1997). Taiwan’s South China Sea Policy. Asian Survey, 37(4), 323–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. China.org.cn. (24 May 2011). China Builds Mega Deep-Sea Oil Rig. Retrieved 7 November 2013, from http://www.china.org.cn/business/2011–05/24/content_22626914.htm.Google Scholar
  23. Clinton, H. (2 July 2010). Statement of the United State Secretary of State Hilary Clinton at the ARF. Retrieved 5 November 2013, from US Department of State: http://www.state.gov/secretary/rm/2010/07/145095.htm.Google Scholar
  24. CNOOC. (5 July 2012). China Started Bids for Southeast Part of South China Sea. Retrieved 7 November 2013, from CNOOC News: http://www.cnooc.com.cn/data/html/news/2012–07-05/chinese/322840.html.Google Scholar
  25. CNOOC. (23 June 2012). Notification of Part of Open Blocks in Waters under Jurisdiction of the People’s Republic of China Available for Foreign Cooperation in the Year of 2012. Retrieved 7 November 2013, from http://en.cnooc.com.cn/data/html/news/2012–06-23/english/322127.html.Google Scholar
  26. Declaration, C. (1 December 1943). Retrieved 4 November 2013, from http://www.ndl.go.jp/constitution/e/shiryo/01/002_46/002_46tx.html.
  27. Djalal, H. (2011, November). The South China Sea: Cooperation for Regional Security and Development. Paper Presented in Third International Workshop. Hanoi, Vietnam.Google Scholar
  28. Dupont, A. (1998). The Environment and Security in Pacific Asia. Adelphi Paper No. 319. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Duursma, J. C. (1996). Fragmentation and the International Relations of Micro-states: Self-determination and Statehood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  30. FAO (Food and Agricultural Organisation). (2011). FAO Yearbook on Fishery and Aquaculture Statistics 2009. Retrieved 4 November 2013, from http://www.fao.org/docrep/016/aq187t/aq187t.pdf.Google Scholar
  31. Gallo, W. (23 January 2013). China Likely to Ignore Philippines’ Challenge in South China Sea. Retrieved 8 November 2013, from Voice of America: http://www.voanews.com/content/china-likely-to-ignore-philippines-challenge-in-south-china-sea-dispute/1589292.html.Google Scholar
  32. Glaser, B. (17 September 2012). Trouble in the South China Sea. Retrieved 8 November 2013, from http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2012/09/17/trouble_in_the_south_china_seaGoogle Scholar
  33. Gupta, S. (2005). Chinese strategies for Resolution of the Taiwan and South China Sea Disputes. International Studies, 42(3–4), 247–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hancox, D., & Prescott, V. (1995). A Geographical Description of the Spratlys Island and an Account of Hydrographic Surveys amongst Those Islands. Maritime Briefings, 1 (6).Google Scholar
  35. ICG (International Crisis Group). (2012). Stirring up the South China Sea (I). Beijing/Brussels: International Crisis Group.Google Scholar
  36. ICJ (International Court of Justice). (18 January 1951). Anglo-Norweigen Fisheries Case. Retrieved 5 November 2013, from World Courts: http://www.worldcourts.com/icj/eng/decisions/1951.12.18_fisheries.htm.Google Scholar
  37. ICJ (International Court of Justice). (16 October 1975). Western Sahara: Advisory Opinion. Retrieved 5 November 2013, from http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/index.php?p1=3&p2=4&case=61&code=sa&p3=4.Google Scholar
  38. International Crisis Group. (24 July 2012). Stirring up the South China Sea (II): Regional Responses. Asia Report (229).Google Scholar
  39. International Crsis Group. (24 July 2012). Stirring up the South China Sea (II): Regional Responses. Asia Report (229), 18–19.Google Scholar
  40. International Institute for Strategic Studies. (2013). Chapter Six: Asia. The Military Balance, 113(1), 277.Google Scholar
  41. International Institute for Strategic Studies. (2013). Chapter Six: Asia. The Military Balance, 113(1), 245–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Jean-Louis. (1837). Notes on the Geography of Cochinchina. Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bengal, 4(2), 737–745.Google Scholar
  43. Jennings, R. (1963). The Acquisition of Territory in International Law. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Jennings, R., & Watts, A. (1992). Oppenheim’s International Law. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
  45. JMFA (Japan Minsitry of Foreign Affairs). (29 September 1972). Joint Communique of the Government of Japan and the Government of the People’s Republic of China. Retrieved 4 November 2013, from http://www.mofa.go.jp/region/asia-paci/china/joint72.html.Google Scholar
  46. Kivimaki, T. (2002). War or Peace in the South China Sea. Copenhagen: Nias Press.Google Scholar
  47. Koh, T. (October 2007). Law and Diplomacy in Singapore. Retrieved 8 November 2013, from Law gazette: http://www.lawgazette.com.sg/2007–10/lawdiplomacy.htm.Google Scholar
  48. Kwiatkowska, B., & Soons, A. (1990). Entitlement to Maritime Areas of Rocks which Cannot Sustain Human Habitation or Economic Life of their Own. Netherlands Yearbook of International Law, 21, 139–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Li, X. (3 August 2013). China Sails through “First Island Chain.” Retrieved 5 November 2013, from China Daily: http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/china/2013–08/02/content_16863833.htm.Google Scholar
  50. Madrolle, C. (1939). La question de Hai-nan et des Paracels. Foreign Policy, 4(3), 302–312.Google Scholar
  51. Malanczuk, P. (1997). Akehurst’s Modern Introduction to International Law. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  52. Mière, C. L. (2011). Policing the Waves: Maritime Paramilitaries in the Asia-Pacific. Survival, 53(1), 133–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the People’s Republic of China. (14 February 2012). Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Liu Weimin’s Regular Press Conference on February 13, 2012. Retrieved 8 November 2013, from http://www.fmprc.gov.cn/eng/xwfw/s2510/t905128.htm.Google Scholar
  54. Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Singapore. (23 January 2013). MFA Spokesman’s comments In response to media queries on the Philippines’ initiation of arbitration proceedings against China under Article 287 and Annex VII of the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS). Retrieved 7 November 2013, from Press Statements and Speeches: http://www.mfa.gov.sg/content/mfa/overseasmission/asean/press_statements_speeches/2013/201301/press_20130123.html.Google Scholar
  55. Monique, C.-G. (1996). La Souveraineté sur les Archipels Paracels et Spratleys. Paris: l’Harmattan.Google Scholar
  56. O’Reilly, B. (2012, 5 15). The Sea Rises in China. Retrieved 15 May 2012, from Aisa Times: http://www.atimes.com/atimes/China/NE15Ad01.html.
  57. O’Callaghan, J. (7 October 2012). Southeast Asia Splashes out on Defense, Mostly Maritime. Retrieved 7 November 2013, from Reuters: http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/10/07/us-defence-southeastasia-idUSBRE8960JY20121007.Google Scholar
  58. Ocean & Law of the Sea, United Nations. (6 May 2009). Outer Limits of the Continental Shelf beyond 200 Nautical Miles from the Baselines: Submissions to the Commission: Joint Submission by Malaysia and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam. Retrieved 7 November 2013, from http://www.un.org/Depts/los/clcs_new/submissions_files/submission_mysvnm_33_2009.htm.Google Scholar
  59. Odgaard, L. (2002). Maritime Security between China and Southeast Asia: Conflict and Cooperation in the Making of Regional Order. London: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  60. OLS (Oceans and Law of the Sea, United Nations). (25 August 2006). Declarations and Statements. Retrieved 5 November 2013, from Division for Ocean Affairs and the Law of the Sea: http://www.un.org/depts/los/convention_agreements/convention_declarations.htm.Google Scholar
  61. People Daily. (11 October 2013). Li Rebukes Unilateral Moves. Retrieved 8 November 2013, from http://english.peopledaily.com.cn/90883/8422016.html.Google Scholar
  62. Petric, E. (6 January 2012). “The Role Of International Law In Foreign Policy Of Small And New States”: Lecture at The Kadirgamar Institute. Retrieved 8 November 2013, from The Kadirgamar Institute: http://www.kadirgamarinstitute.lk/old_events/page/news_old8.htm.Google Scholar
  63. Potsdam Declaration. (29 July 1945). Retrieved 4 November 2013, from The Japanese Surrender Documents — WWII: http://www.ibiblio.org/pha/policy/1945/450729a.html.
  64. Republic of the Philippines, Department of Foreign Affairs. (22 January 2013). Notification and Statement of Claim. Retrieved 8 November 2013, from http://xa.yimg.com/kq/groups/11561283/574494819/name/Notification%20and%20Statement%20of%20Claim%20on%20West%20Philippine%20Sea.Google Scholar
  65. Republic of the Philippines, Department of Foreign Affairs. (22 January 2013). Statement by Secretary of Foreign Affairs Albert del Rosario on the UNCLOS Arbitral Proceedings against China to Achieve a Peaceful and Durable Solution to the Dispute in the West Philippine Sea. Retrieved 8 November 2013, from http://www.dfa.gov.ph/index.php/newsroom/dfa-releases/7300-statement-by-secretary-of-foreign-affairs-albert-del-rosario-on-the-unclos-arbitral-proceedings-against-china-to-achieve-a-peaceful-and-durable-solution-to-the-dispute-in-the-wps.Google Scholar
  66. RIAA (Reports of International Arbitration Awards). (4 April 1928). Island of Palmas Case. Retrieved 5 November 2013, from UN Reports of International Arbitration Awards: http://legal.un.org/riaa/cases/vol_II/829–871.pdf.Google Scholar
  67. Ririhena, Y. (29 September 2012). RI Circulates Draft Code of Conduct on South China Sea. Retrieved 8 November 2013, from the Jakarta Post: http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2012/09/29/ri-circulates-draft-code-conduct-south-china-sea.html.
  68. Samuels, M. (1982). Contest for the South China Sea. New York and London: Methuen.Google Scholar
  69. Schwarzenberger, G. (1957). Title to Territory: Response to a Challenge. The American Journal of International Law, 308–324.Google Scholar
  70. Shaw, M. (2003). International Law (5th ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Snyder, S., Glosserman, B., & Cossa, R. A. (August 2001). Confidence Building Measures in the South China Sea, Issues, and Insights. Retrieved 4 November 2013, from Pacific Forum CSIS: https://csis.org/files/publication/issuesin-sightsv01n02.pdf.Google Scholar
  72. Son, N. H. (19–21 November 2012). Domestic Politics: The “Under-Current” That Decides the South China Sea. Paper Presented at the Fourth International Workshop: “The South China Sea: Cooperation for Regional Security and Development.” Ho Chi Minh.Google Scholar
  73. Storey, I. (3–5 November 2011). Intra-ASEAN Dynamics and the South China Sea Dispute: Implications for the DoC/CoC Process and ZoPFFC Proposal. Paper Presented at the Third International Workshop “The South China Sea: Cooperation for Regional Security and Development,” 3. Hanoi, Vietnam.Google Scholar
  74. Storey, I. (3 August 2012). China Pushes on the South China Sea, ASEAN Unity Collapses. China Brief, 12(15).Google Scholar
  75. Storey, I. (2013). Manila Ups the Ante in the South China Sea. China Brief, 13(3).Google Scholar
  76. Tay, S. (29 January 2013). Legal Route to Resolve South China Sea Dispute a Political Minefield. Retrieved 8 November 2013, from South China Morning Post: http://www.scmp.com/comment/insight-opinion/article/1138003/legalroute-resolve-south-china-sea-dispute-political.Google Scholar
  77. Thanh Nien Daily. (22 September 2011). Vietnam, US Ink Deal to Boost Defense Ties. Retrieved 8 November 2013, from http://www.thanhniennews.com/2010/pages/20110922122207.aspx.Google Scholar
  78. Thayer, C. A. (20 August 2012). ASEAN’s Code of Conduct in the South China Sea: A litmus Test for Community-Building? The Asia-Pacific Journal, 10(34).Google Scholar
  79. Thayer, C. A. (9 October 2013). New Commitment to a Code of Conduct in the South China Sea? The National Bureau of Asian Research.Google Scholar
  80. The Jakarta Post. (17 November 2011). New US Base in RI’s Backyard. Retrieved 8 November 2013, from http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2011/11/17/new-us-base-ri-s-backyard.html.Google Scholar
  81. Treaty of Peace with Japan. (28 April 1952). Retrieved 5 November 2013, from Taiwan Documents Project: http://www.taiwandocuments.org/sanfrancisco01.htm.
  82. US Department of State. (23 July 2010). Remarks by Secretary Clinton: July 2010. Retrieved 8 November 2013, from http://www.state.gov/secretary/rm/2010/07/145095.htm.Google Scholar
  83. US Navy. (2007, October). A Cooperative Strategy for 21st Century Sea Power. Retrieved 5 November 2013, from http://www.navy.mil/maritime/maritimes-trategy.pdf.Google Scholar
  84. UN (United Nations). (14 April 2011). Note from the Permanent Mission of the People’s Republic of China to the Secretary-Genral of the United Nations. Retrieved 5 November 2013, from United Nations: https://www.un.org/depts/los/clcs_new/submissions_files/vnm37_09/chn_2011_re_phl_e.pdf.Google Scholar
  85. UN Division for Ocean Affairs and the Law of the Sea. (25 August 2006). Declaration under Article 298 by the Government of the People’s Republic of China. Retrieved 8 November 2013, from http://www.un.org/Depts/los/convention_agreements/convention_declarations.htm#China.Google Scholar
  86. UNCLOS (United National Covention on the Law of the Sea) (10 December 1982). United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea of 10 December 1982 Overview and Full Text. Retrieved 5 November 2013, from Oceans and Law of the Sea, United Nations: http://www.un.org/depts/los/convention_agreements/texts/unclos/unclos_e.pdf.Google Scholar
  87. United Nations. (10 December 1982). United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. Retrieved 8 November 2013, from http://www.un.org/depts/los/convention_agreements/convention_overview_convention.htm.Google Scholar
  88. United Nations. (10 December 1982). United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Article 123 in Part IX. Retrieved 8 November 2013, from http://www.un.org/depts/los/convention_agreements/convention_overview_convention.htm.Google Scholar
  89. United Nations. (2005). No.41860. China and Viet Nam: Agreement between the People’s Republic of China and the Socialist Republic of Viet Nam on the Delimitation of the Territorial Seas, Exclusive Economic Zones and Continental Shelves of the Two Countries in Beibu Gulf/Bac Bo Gu. Treaties and International Agreements, 2336, 179.Google Scholar
  90. Valero, G. M. (1994). Spratly Archipelago Dispute: Is the Question of Sovereignty Still Relevant. Marine Policy, 18(4), 314–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Wanandi, J. (12 November 2012). Indonesia Eyes SE Asian Leader Role. Retrieved 8 November 2013, from Global Times: http://www.globaltimes.cn/NEWS/tabid/99/ID/743899/Indonesia-eyes-SE-Asian-leader-role.aspx.Google Scholar
  92. Wang, Q. (17 June 2011). Maritime Forces to be Beefed up Amid Disputes. Retrieved 7 November 2013, from China Daily: http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/china/2011–06/17/content_12718632.htm.Google Scholar
  93. Womack, B. (13 February 2006). China and Vietnam: The Politics of Asymmetry. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Xinhua. (24 May 2012). ASEAN Concludes Drafting Key Elements for COC in South China Sea. Retrieved 8 November 2013, from http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/world/2012–05/24/c_131609090.htm.Google Scholar
  95. Xinhua. (3 September 2012). US Owes China Convincing Explanation of True Intentions of Its Asia Pivot Policy. Retrieved 8 November 2013, from http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/indepth/2012–09/03/c_131824191.htm.Google Scholar
  96. Xinhua. (10 March 2013). China to Regroup Marine Bodies to Safeguard Rights. Retrieved 7 November 2013, from Xinhua: http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/china/2013–03/10/c_132223145.htm.Google Scholar
  97. Xinhua. (5 August 2013). China Warns against Rush to Set Code of Conduct in South China Sea. Retrieved 8 November 2013, from http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/china/2013–08/05/c_132603785.htm.Google Scholar
  98. Xinhua. (5 August 2013). China Warns against Rush to Set Code of Conduct in South China Sea. Retrieved 8 November 2013, from http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/china/2013–08/05/c_132603785.htm.Google Scholar
  99. Yoshida, R. (7 November 2012). Beijing’s Senkaku Goal: Sub “Safe Haven” in South China Sea. Retrieved 5 November 2013, from The Japan Times: http://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2012/11/07/national/beijings-senkaku-goal-subsafe-haven-in-south-china-sea/#.Unha5XCnqX5.
  100. Zou, K. (2005). The Sino-Vietnamese Agreement on Maritime Boundary Delimitation in the Gulf of Tonkin. Ocean Development & International Law, 36, 13–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Yang Fang 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yang Fang

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations