Introduction: Unknotting Tangled Lines in the South China Sea Dispute
With a constant resurgence of tensions over territorial disputes in the South China Sea, the prospects of developing an effective and long-term “solution” to the issue are becoming increasingly challenging. The dispute exists within a complex web composed of claims of historical sovereignty, legal ambiguities, and a relatively constrained Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN). Most importantly, Southeast Asian regional security hinges on the geopolitical climax of two major powers, the United States and China, both seeking to establish a primary and lasting presence in the region. While the shadow of external actors weighs heavily over choices and decisions of Southeast Asian countries, leaders in claimant countries have used sovereignty disputes as rallying points to solidify the legitimacy to govern their own people. As a result, the disputes now involve an irreversible nationalistic sentiment that leaders themselves might find challenging to dismiss when it comes to making compromises while negotiating solutions.
KeywordsDemocratic Progressive Party Domestic Politics Energy Information Administration Energy Information Administration Spratly Island
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Chao, Z. (1987). On the Ban of Maritime Trade of the Ming Dynasty. Journal of Shandong University, 2, 120–127.Google Scholar
- Elleman, B. A. (2011). China’s 1974 Naval Expedition to the Paracel Islands. In B. A. Paine (ed.), Naval Power and Expeditionary Wars: Peripheral Campaigns and New Theatres of Naval Warfare (pp. 141–150). Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Franckx, E., & Benatar, M. (2011). Dotted Lines in the South China Sea: Fishing for (Legal) Clarity. In T. T. Thuy (ed.), The South China Sea: Towards a Region of Peace, Security and Cooperation (pp. 210–232). Hanoi: The Gioi Publishers.Google Scholar
- Gallardo, S. M., & Baviera, A. S. (2012). Filipino Media and Public Opinion on the Philippines — China Disputes in the South China Sea: A Preliminary Analysis. Paper presented at the 4th International Workshop on “The South China Sea: Cooperation for Regional Security and Development,” organized by the Diplomatic Academy of the Vietnam and the Vietnam Lawyers’ Association, 18–21 November.Google Scholar
- Gregor, A. J. (1989). In the Shadow of Giants: The Major Powers and the Security of Southeast Asia. Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution Press.Google Scholar
- ICG (International Crisis Group). (2012). Stirring up the South China Sea (I). Beijing/Brussels: International Crisis Group.Google Scholar
- Joyner, C. C. (1999). The Spratly Islands Dispute in the South China Sea: Problems, Policies, and Prospects for Diplomatic. In R. K. Singh (ed.), Investigating Confidence-Building Measures in the Asia-Pacific Region (pp. 53–108). Washington, DC: Stimson Center.Google Scholar
- Ministry of Fisheries and the World Bank. (16 February 2005). Vietnam: Fisheries and Aquaculture Sector Study — Final Report. Retrieved 25 February 2014, from World Bank: Openk Knowledge Repository: https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/handle/10986/8533/316950VN0white11official0use0only10.pdf?sequence=1.Google Scholar
- Till, G. (2008). The South China Sea dispute: An International History. In R. E. Sam Bateman (ed.), Security and International Politics in the South China Sea: Towards a Co-Operative Management Regime (pp. 26–41). Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Till, G. (2013). Seapower: A Guide for the Twenty-First Century. Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Tonnesson, S. (2002). The History of the Dispute. In T. Kivimäki (ed.), War Or Peace in the South China Sea? (pp. 6–23). Copenhagen: NAIS Press.Google Scholar