Abstract
Inequalities involving English have been a subject of much critical scrutiny. The multiple dimensions of this inequality—the greater value attributed to ‘standard’ varieties of English over other varieties; the dominance English exerts over other languages as a ‘global language’; and the consequences of social inequality that derive from such unequal evaluations—have indeed been key topics for sociolinguistic and applied linguistic research. In this chapter, I aim to draw attention to how dimensions of subjectivity rooted in lived experiences may contribute to such inequalities of English. I propose that addressing and contesting inequalities of English requires politicization of seemingly personal and mundane feelings regarding English in everyday life, as it is such aspects of subjectivity through which more enduring effects of unequal Englishes are reproduced and naturalized. Through an account of how anxieties about English in Korea are rooted in multiple structures of inequalities, I argue that finding ways to articulate and reflect upon such insecurities becomes an important way of making visible the mechanisms of unequal Englishes and securing political space for transforming the meaning of English.
Keywords
Native Speaker English Language Learning Language Ideology Imperial Power Japanese ColonialismPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- Ahmed, S 2004, The cultural politics of emotion, Routledge, New York.Google Scholar
- Besnier, N 1990, ‘Language and affect’, Annual Review of Anthropology, vol. 19, pp. 419–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Besnier, N 2011, On the edge of the global: modern anxieties in a Pacific island nation, Stanford University Press, Stanford.Google Scholar
- Bourdieu, P 1991, Language and symbolic power, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
- Cho, J 2012, ‘Global fatigue: transnational markets, linguistic capital, and Korean-American male English teachers in South Korea’, Journal of Sociolinguistics, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 218–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Foucault, M 1997, Ethics: subjectivity and truth, The New Press, New York.Google Scholar
- Hardt, M & Negri, A 2000, Empire, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
- Hochschild, A 1983, The managed heart: commercialization of human feelings, University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
- Kang, J & Abelmann, N 2011, ‘The domestication of South Korean pre-college study abroad in the first decade of the millennium’, The Journal of Korean Studies, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 89–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kim, H 2010, ‘Yeongeo gyeokchaui siltaewa gwaje’, 2010 Hanguk Sahoebojanghakhoe Chungyejeonggi Haksuldaehoe jalyojip, pp. 179–210.Google Scholar
- Kim, N 2008, Imperial citizens: Koreans and race from Seoul to LA, Stanford University Press, Stanford.Google Scholar
- Labov, W 1966, The social stratification of English in New York City, Center for Applied Linguistics, Washington DC.Google Scholar
- Lo, A & Kim, JC 2012, ‘Linguistic competency and citizenship: contrasting portraits of multilingualism in the South Korean popular media’, Journal of Sociolinguistics, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 255–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lutz, C & Abu-Lughod, L (eds) 1990, Language and the politics of emotion, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
- McElhinny B 2010, ‘The audacity of affect: gender, race, and history in linguistic accounts of legitimacy and belonging’, Annual Review of Anthropology, vol. 39, pp. 309–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ortner, SB 2005, ‘Subjectivity and cultural critique’, Anthropological Theory, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 31–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Park, JS 2008, ‘Two processes of reproducing monolingualism in South Korea’, Sociolinguistic Studies, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 331–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Park, JS 2009, The local construction of a global language: ideologies of English in South Korea, Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Park, JS 2010a, ‘Naturalization of competence and the neoliberal subject: success stories of English language learning in the Korean conservative press, Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 22–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Park, JS 2010b, ‘Images of “good English” in the Korean conservative press: three processes of interdiscursivity’, Pragmatics and Society, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 189–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Park, JS 2011a, ‘The promise of English: linguistic capital and the neoliberal worker in the South Korean job market’, International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 443–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Park, JS 2011b, ‘Framing, stance, and affect in Korean metalinguistic discourse’, Pragmatics, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 265–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Park, JS 2012, ‘English as border crossing: longing and belonging in the South Korean experience’, in V Rapatahana & P Bunce (eds), English Language as Hydra: its impacts on non-English language cultures, Multilingual Matters, Bristol, pp. 208–220.Google Scholar
- Park, JS & Bae, S 2009, ‘Language ideologies in educational migration: Korean jogi yuhak families in Singapore’, Linguistics and Education, vol. 20, pp. 366–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Park, JS & Wee, L 2012, Markets of English: linguistic capital and language policy in a globalizing world, Routledge, New York.Google Scholar
- Pennycook, A 2001 Critical applied linguistics: a critical introduction, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah.Google Scholar
- Schmid, A 2002, Korea between empires, 1895–1919, Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
- Urciuoli, B 2008, ‘Skills and selves in the new workplace’, American Ethnologist, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 211–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Wilce, J 2009, Language and emotion, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Williams, R 1977, Marxism and literature, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
- Yi, S 2007, ‘Segyehwawa yeongeo jegukui nonli’, in Y Jigwan (ed), Yeongeo, Nae Maului Sikminjuui, Dangdae, Seoul, pp. 265–288.Google Scholar