Saying “No” to Whiteness

Negotiating the Unstated Requests of the Academy
  • Phillip Atiba Goff
Part of the The Future of Minority Studies book series (FMS)

Abstract

Junior faculty are advised to say “no” to many things in order to preserve time to write and, ultimately, to get tenure. They are told to say “no” to committee requests (though, only to the unimportant ones). They are told to say “no” to requests for service (except for the service the university is counting on them to deliver). And they are told to say “no” to burdensome mentorship commitments (unless the students truly need them). Whenever an institution does not reward their faculty with teaching releases, financial compensation, or tenure considerations, junior faculty are urged to exercise discretion, and say “no” whenever possible. Finding a way to say “no,” in fact, can be among the most challenging negotiations for new faculty and, ultimately, may be the difference between receiving tenure and being encouraged to send out your resume.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ackerman, J. M., Shapiro, J. R., Neuberg, S. L., Kenrick, D. T., Becker, D. V., Griskevicius, V., Maner, J. K., & Schaler, M. (2006). They all look the same to me (unless they’re angry): From out-group homogeneity to out-group heterogeneity. Psychological Science, 17, 836–840.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aitchison, W. (2003). The FMLA: Understanding the Family Medical Leave Act. Portland, OR: Labor Relations Information System.Google Scholar
  3. Allen, W. R., Epps, E. G., Guillory, E. A., Suh, S. A., & Bonous-Hammarth, M. (2000). The Black academic: Faculty status among African Americans in U.S. higher education. The Journal of Negro Education, 69, 112–127.Google Scholar
  4. Bellas, M. L. & Toutkoushian, R. K. (1999). Faculty time allocations and research productivity: Gender, race and family effects. Review of Higher Education, 22, 367–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blanton, H., Crocker, J., & Miller, D. T. (2000). The effects of in-group versus out-group social comparison on self-esteem in the context of a negative stereotype. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 519–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bobo, L., Kluegel, J. R. & Smith, R. A. (1997). Laissez-faire racism: The crystallization of a kinder, gentler antiblack ideology. In S. A. Tuch & J. K. Martin (Eds.), Racial attitudes in the 1990s: Continuity and change (pp. 15–44). Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
  7. Brewer, M. B. (1993). Social identity, distinctiveness, and in-group homogeneity. Social Cognition, 11, 150–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brigham, J. C. (1993). College students’ racial attitudes. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23, 1933–1967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carroll, G. (1998). Mundane extreme environmental stress and African American families: A case for recognizing different realities. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 29, 271–284.Google Scholar
  10. Cohen, G. L., & Steele, C. M. (2002). A barrier of mistrust: How negative stereotypes affect cross-race mentoring. In J. Aronson (Ed.), Improving academic achievement (pp. 303–327). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cohen, G. L., Steele, C. M., & Ross, L. D. (1999). The mentor’s dilemma: Providing critical feedback across the racial divide. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 1302–1318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Colbeck, C. L. (1998). Merging in a seamless blend: How faculty integrate teaching and research. Journal of Higher Education, 69, 647–671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Croizet, J. C., & Claire, T. (1998). Extending the concept of stereotype threat to social class: The intellectual underperformance of students from low socioeconomic backgrounds. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 588–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Crosby, J. R., & Monin, B. (2007). Failure to warn: How student race affects warnings of potential academic difficulty. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 663–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Davies, P. G., Spencer, S. J., Quinn, D. M., & Gerhardstein, R. (2002). Consuming images: How television commercials that elicit stereotype threat can restrain women academically and professionally. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1615–1628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Devine, P. G., & Elliot, A. J. (1995). Are racial stereotypes really fading? The Princeton Trilogy revisited. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 1139–1150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dovidio, J. F. (2001). On the nature of contemporary prejudice: The third wave. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 829–849.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dovidio, J. F., Kawakami, K., & Gaertner, S. L. (2001). Implicit and explicit prejudice and interracial interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 62–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Elmore, C. J., & Blackburn, R. T. (1983). Black and white faculty in white research universities. Journal of Higher Education, 54, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Frantz, C. M., Cuddy, A. J. C., Burnett, M., Ray, H., & Hart, A. (2004). A threat in the computer: The race implicit association test as a stereotype threat experience. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 1611–1624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gaertner, S. L., & Dovidio, J. F. (1986). The aversive form of racism. In J. F. Dovidio & S. L. Gaertner (Eds.), Prejudice, discrimination, and racism (pp. 61–89). San Diego, CA: Academic.Google Scholar
  22. Goff, P. A., & Jackson, M. C. (2014). Under experts’ eyes: How concerns with racial expertise and the self-relevance of racism influences whites’ concerns with appearing prejudiced. Manuscript in preparation.Google Scholar
  23. Goff, P. A., Steele, C. M., & Davies, P. G. (2008). The space between us: Stereotype threat and distance in interracial contexts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 91–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Golby, A. J., Gabrieli, J. D. E., Chiao, J. Y., & Eberhardt, J. L. (2001). Differential responses in the fusiform region to same-race and other-race faces. Nature Neuroscience, 4, 845–850.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. L. K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464–1480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Inzlicht, M., & Ben-Zeev, T. (2000). A threatening intellectual environment: Why females are susceptible to experiencing problem-solving deficits in the presence of males. Psychological Science, 11, 365–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Inzlicht, M., & Ben-Zeev, T. (2003). Do high-achieving female students underperform in private? The implications of threatening environments on intellectual processing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 796–805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kinder, D. R., & Sears, D. O. (1981). Symbolic racism versus racial threats to the good life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 414–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Landrine, H., & Klonoff, E. A. (1996). The schedule of racist events: A measure of racial discrimination and a study of its negative physical and mental health consequences. Journal of Black Psychology, 22, 144–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Levin, D. T. (2000). Race as a visual feature: Using visual search and perceptual discrimination tasks to understand face categories and the cross-race recognition deficit. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 559–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Levin, D. T., & Angelone, B. L. (2002). Categorical perception of race. Perception, 31, 567–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Levin, D. T., & Banaji, M. R. (2006). Distortions in the perceived lightness of faces: The role of race categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135, 501–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Linville, P. W., & Fischer, G. W. (1998). Group variability and covariation: Effects on intergroup judgment and behavior. In C. Sedikides, J. Schopler, & C. A. Insko (Eds.), Intergroup cognition and intergroup behavior (pp. 123–150). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  34. Linville, P. W., Fischer, G. W., & Yoon, C. (1996). Perceived covariation among the features of ingroup and outgroup members: The outgroup covariation effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 421–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lord, C. G., & Saenz, D. S. (1985). Memory deficits and memory surfeits: Differential cognitive consequences of tokenism for tokens and observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 918–926.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lord, C. G., Saenz, D. S., & Godfry, D. K. (1987). Effects of perceived scrutiny on participant memory for social interactions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 23, 498–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Marx, D. M., & Goff, P. A. (2005). Clearing the air: The effects of black experimenters on black students’ subjective experience and verbal test performance. British Journal of Social Psychology, 44, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Marx, D. M., & Roman, J. S. (2002). Female role models: Protecting women’s math test performance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1183–1193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Marx, D. M., Stapel, D. A., & Muller, D. (2005). We can do it: The interplay of construal orientation and social comparisons under threat. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 432–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Mays, V. M., Cochran, S. D., & Barnes, N. W. (2007). Race, race-based discrimination, and health outcomes among African Americans. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 201–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. McConahay, J. B. (1986). Modern racism, ambivalence, and the Modern Racism Scale. In J. F. Dovidio & S. L. Gaertner (Eds.), Prejudice, discrimination, and racism (pp. 91–125). San Diego, CA: Academic.Google Scholar
  42. Menges, R. J., & Exum, W. H. (1983). Barriers to the progress of women and minority faculty. Journal of Higher Education, 54, 123–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Murphy, M. C., Steele, C. M., & Gross, J. J. (2007). Signaling threat: How situational cues affect women in math, science, and engineering settings. Psychological Science, 18, 879–885.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Ostrom, T. M., & Sedikides, C. (1992). Out-group homogeneity effects in natural and minimal groups. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 536–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Park, B., Judd, C. M., & Ryan, C. S. (1991). Social categorization and the representation of variability information. European Review of Social Psychology, 2, 211–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Park, S. M. (1996). Research, teaching, and service: Why shouldn’t women’s work count? Journal of Higher Education, 67, 46–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Patterson, O. (1997). The ordeal of integration: Progress and resentment in America’s “racial crisis.” Washington, DC: Civitas/Counterpoint.Google Scholar
  48. Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 751–783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Pierce, C. (1970). Offensive mechanisms. In F. Barbour (Ed.), The black seventies (pp. 265–282). Boston: Porter Sargent.Google Scholar
  50. Pierce, C. (1974). Psychiatric problems of the black minority. In S. Arieti (Ed.), American handbook of psychiatry (pp. 512–523). New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  51. Ponterotto, J. G., Utsey, S. O., & Pedersen, P. (2006). Preventing prejudice: A guide for counselors, educators, and parents, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  52. Richeson, J. A., & Shelton, J. N. (2003). When prejudice does not pay: Effects of interracial contact on executive function. Psychological Science, 14, 287–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Richeson, J. A., & Shelton, J. N. (2007). Interracial interactions: Costs, consequences, and possibilities. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 316–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Saenz, D. S., & Lord, C. G. (1989). Reversing roles: A cognitive strategy for undoing memory deficits associated with token status. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 698–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Sekaquaptewa, D., & Thompson, M. (2003). Solo status, stereotype threat, and performance expectancies: Their effects on women’s performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 68–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sekaquaptewa, D., Waldman, A., & Thompson, M. (2007). Solo status and self-construal: Being distinctive influences racial self-construal and performance apprehension in African American women. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 13, 321–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Shelton, J. N., Richeson, J. A., Salvatore, J., & Trawalter, S. (2005). Ironic effects of racial bias during interracial interactions. Psychological Science, 16, 397–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Sinclair, S., Lowery, B. S., Hardin, C. D., & Colangelo, A. (2005). Social tuning of automatic racial attitudes: The role of affiliative motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 583–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Spencer, S. J., Steele, C. M., & Quinn, D. M. (1999). Stereotype threat and women’s math performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 4–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. State of California. (1996). California Proposition 209. Retrieved May 1, 2008, from http://vote96.sos.ca.gov/BP/209text.htm.Google Scholar
  62. Steele, C. M. (1992). Race and the schooling of black Americans. Atlantic, 269, 68–78.Google Scholar
  63. Steele, C. M. (1997). A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. American Psychologist, 52, 613–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Steele, C. M., & Aaronson, J. (1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(5), 797–811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Trower, C. A., & Chait, R. P. (2002, March–April). Faculty diversity: Too little for too long. Harvard Magazine, 33–38.Google Scholar
  66. University of California. (2006). Academic personnel manual, section 210. Retrieved May 1, 2008, from http://www.ucop.edu/acadadv/acadpers/apm/welcome.html.Google Scholar
  67. Vogel, L. (1993). Mothers on the job: Maternity policy in the U.S. workplace. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  68. Vorauer, J. D., & Kumhyr, S. M. (2001). Is this about you or me? Self-versus other-directed judgments and feelings in response to intergroup interaction. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 706–719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Vorauer, J. D., & Turpie, C. A. (2004). Disruptive effects of vigilance on dominant group members’ treatment of outgroup members: Choking versus shining under pressure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 384–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Walton, G. M., & Cohen, G. L. (2007). A question of belonging: Race, social fit, and achievement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 82–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Word, C. O., Zanna, M. P., & Cooper, J. (1974). The nonverbal mediation of self-fulfilling prophecies in interracial interaction. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 10, 109–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Stephanie A. Fryberg and Ernesto Javier Martínez 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Phillip Atiba Goff

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations