Innovation in Emerging Economies: The Spillover Effects of Foreign Direct Investment and Institutions in Russia



Economic literature has long emphasized the positive relationship between innovation and economic growth (Baumol, 1968; Cooke, 1998). Innovation capability has been acknowledged to differ across countries and sub-national regions (Lee and Peterson, 2000; Acs et al., 2002; Fritsch, 2002; Michaelides et al., 2004). Academic literature, however, still lacks studies, examining the effect of the regional variations in the business environment on innovation output, for example, on patents, products or services (Rogers, 1998).


Foreign Direct Invest Foreign Investment American Economic Review Transition Economy Domestic Firm 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Acs, Z.J., Anselin, L. and Vanga, A. (2002). Patents and Innovation Counts as Measures of Regional Production of New Knowledge, Research Policy, 31: 1069–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahrend, R. (2000). Foreign Direct Investment into Russia — Pain Without Gain? A Survey of Foreign Direct Investors, RECEP Discussion Paper, May.Google Scholar
  3. Ahrend, R. (2008). Understanding Russian Regions’ Economic Performance During Periods of Decline and Growth: An Extreme-bond Analysis Approach, Working Paper, OECD Economics Department.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aidis, R. and Adachi, Y. (2007). Firm Entry and Survival Barriers, Economic Systems, 31: 391–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Aidis, R., Estrin, S. and Mickiewicz, T. (2008). Institutions and Entrepreneurship in Russia: A Comparative Perspective, Journal of Business Venturing, 23: 656–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Aitken, B.J. and Harrison, A.E. (1999) Do Domestic Firms Benefit from Direct Foreign Investment? Evidence from Venezuela, The American Economic Review, 6: 605–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Baumol, W.J. (1968). On the Social Rate of Discount, The American Economic Review, 58(4): 788–802.Google Scholar
  8. Baumol, W.J. (1990). Entrepreneurship: Productive, Unproductive and Destructive, The Journal of Political Economy, 98(5): 893–921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Black, S. and Lynch, L. (1996). Human-Capital Investments and Productivity, American Economic Review, 86: 263–68.Google Scholar
  10. Blomström, M. and Persson, H. (1983). Foreign Investment and Spillover Efficiency in an Underdeveloped Economy: Evidence from the Mexican Manufacturing Industry, World Development, 11: 493–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Blomström, M. and Sjöholm, F. (1999). Technology Transfer and Spillovers: Does Local Participation with Multinationals Matter? European Economic Review, 43: 915–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bradshaw, M.J. (1997). The Geography of Foreign Investment in Russia, 1993–95, Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 88(1): 77–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bradshaw, M.J. (2002). The Changing Geography of Foreign Investment in the Russian Federation, Russian Economic Trends, 112: 33–41.Google Scholar
  14. Broadman, H.G. and Recanatini, F. (2002). Where Has All Foreign Direct Investment Gone in Russia, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper Series, The World Bank.Google Scholar
  15. Brock, G. (1998). Foreign Direct Investment in Russia’s Regions 1993–95. Why So Little, and Where Has It Gone? Economics of Transition, 2640, 349–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Busenitz, L.W., Gomez, C. and Spencer, J.W. (2000). Country Institutional Profiles: Unlocking Entrepreneurial Phenomena, Academy of Management Journal, 43: 994–1003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cannon, E. (2000). Human Capital: Level Versus Growth Effects, Oxford Economic Papers, 52: 670–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cantwell, J. and Iammarino, S. (2003). Multinational Corporations and European Regional Systems of Innovation. London: Routledge;Google Scholar
  19. Cheung, K.Y. and Lin, P. (2004). Spillover Effects of FDI on Innovation in China: Evidence from the Provincial Data, China Economic Review, 15: 25–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Cooke, P. (1998) Regional Systems of Innovation: An Evolutionary Perspective, Environment and Planning, 30: 1563–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Crespo-Cuaresma, J., Foster, N. and Scharler, J. (2004). The Determinants of Absorptive Capacity: Evidence from OECD Countries, Workshshop No. 2/2004.Google Scholar
  22. Crosby, M. (2000). Patents, Innovation and Growth, The Economic Record, 76(234): 255–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Daniele, D. and Marani, U. (2010). Organised Crime and Foreign Direct Investment: The Italian Case, European Journal of Political Economy, 27(1): 132–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Dezhina, I. (2004). Financial Institutions in the Sphere of Technology Commercialisation. The Russian Experience, Belarus Economic Journal, 4: 35–48.Google Scholar
  25. Dezhina, I. and Saltikov, B. (2004). Incentive Mechanisms of the Commercialisation of R&D, Working Paper, Institute of the Transition Economies: 1–46.Google Scholar
  26. Doloreux D. (2002). What We Should Know About Regional Systems of Innovation, Technology in Society, 24: 243–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Dyker, D.A. (2001). Technology Exchange and the Foreign Business Sector in Russia, Research Policy, 30: 851–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ernst and Young (2012). Available at: Accessed June 2012.
  29. Falvey, R., Foster, N. and Greenaway, D. (2007). Relative Backwardness, Absorptive Capacity and Knowledge Spillovers, Economics Letters, 97: 230–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. FIAC, Foreign Investment Advisory Council (2006). Russia: Investment Destinations 2006. Moscow.Google Scholar
  31. Freeman, C. (1987). Technology and Economic Performance: Lessons from Japan. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
  32. Freeman, C. (1998). Innovation Systems: City-state, National, Continental and Subnational. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
  33. Freeman, C. (1995). The National System of Innovation in Historical Perspective, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19: 5–24.Google Scholar
  34. Fritsch, M. (2002). Measuring the Quality of Regional Innovation System: A Knowledge Production Function Approach, International Regional Science Review, 251: 86–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Fu, X. (2008). Foreign Direct Investment, Absorptive Capacity and Regional Innovation Capabilities: Evidence of China, Oxford Development Studies, 361: 89–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Furman, J.L., Porter, M.E. and Stern, S. (2002). The Determinants of National Innovative Capacity, Research Policy, 31(6): 899–933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Fye, T. and Shleifer, A. (1997). The Invisible Hand and the Grabbing Hand, American Economic Review, 87: 354–58;Google Scholar
  38. Gianella, C. and Tompson, W. (2007). Stimulating Innovation in Russia: The Role of Institutions and Policies, Working Paper, Paris, France: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Girma, S. and Wakelin, K. (2001). A Semi-Parametric Analysis, Internationalisation of Economic Policy, Programme Research Paper Series 11.Google Scholar
  40. Gokhberg, L. and Kuznetsova, T. (2011). S&T and Innovation in Russia: Key Challenges of the Post-Crisis Period, Journal of East-West Business, 17: 73–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Golubchikov, O. (2007). Re-Scaling the Debate on Russian Economic Growth: Regional Restructuring and Development Asynchronies, Europa-Asia Studies, 59: 191–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Görg, H. and Greenaway, D. (2004). Much Ado About Nothing? Do Domestic Firms Really Benefit from Foreign Direct Investment? World Bank Research Observer, 19(2): 171–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Graham, E.M. and Krugman, P. (1991). Foreign Direct Investment in the United States. 2nd Edition, Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar
  44. Granville, B. and Leonard, C.S. (2010). Do Institutions Matter for Technological Change in Russia? The Impact of Communist Norms and Conventions, 1998–2004, World Development, 382: 155–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Griliches, Z. (1990). Patents Statistics and Economic Indicators: A Survey, Journal of Economic Literature, 28: 1661–707.Google Scholar
  46. Griliches, Z. (1995). R&D and Productivity: Econometric Results and Measurement Issues. In Stoneman, P. (Ed.) Handbook of the Economics of Innovation and Technological Change. Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell: 52–89.Google Scholar
  47. Griscuolo, P. and Narula, R. (2003). A Novel Approach to National Technological Accumulation and Absorptive Capacity: Aggregating Cohen and Levinthal, Discussion Paper, MERIT-Infonomics Research Memorandum Series.Google Scholar
  48. Heckman, J. (1979) Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error, Econometrica, 47(1): 153–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Hirvensalo, I. and Lausala, T. (2001). Foreign Direct Investments in the Russian Territories of the Barents Region, Working Papers W-285, Helsinki School of Economics and Business Administration, Helsinki.Google Scholar
  50. Hobday, M. (1995). East Asian Latecomer Firms: Learning the Technology of Electronics, World Development, 23(7): 1171–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Holland, D. and Pain, N. (1998). The Determinants and Impact of Foreign Direct Investment in the Transition Economies: A Panel Data Analysis. In Edwards, V. (Ed.) Convergence or Divergence: Aspirations and Reality in Central and Eastern Europe and Russia. Centre for Research into East European Business, University of Buckingham, UK.Google Scholar
  52. IMF, International Monetary Fund (1997). International Financial Statistics Yearbook. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.Google Scholar
  53. IMF, International Monetary Fund (2003). Foreign Direct Investment in Emerging Market Countries. Report of the Working Group of the Capital Markets Consultative Group.Google Scholar
  54. Iwasaki, I. and Suganuma, K. (2005). Regional Distribution of Foreign Direct Investment in Russia, Post-Communist Economies, 172: 153–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Jackobs, W.P. (1969). The Economy of Cities. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
  56. Johnson, S., Kaufmann, D. and Zoido-Lobaton, P. (1998). Regulatory Discretion and the Unofficial Economy, American Economic Review, 88(2): 387–92.Google Scholar
  57. Jones, A., Fallon, G. and Golov, R. (2000). Obstacles to Foreign Direct Investment in Russia, European Business Review, 124: 187–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Kanwar, S. and Evenson, R. (2003). Does Intellectual Property Protection Spur Technological Change? Oxford Economic Papers, 552: 235–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Kaufmann, A. and Todtling, F. (2000). Systems of Innovation in Traditional Industrial Regions: The Case of Styria in a Comparative Perspective, Regional Studies, 34(1): 29–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Lall, S. and Urata, S. (2003). Competitiveness, FDI and Technological Activity in East Asia. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Lee, S.M. and Peterson, S.J. (2000). Culture, Entrepreneurial Orientation and Global Competitiveness, Journal of World Business, 35(4): 401–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Ledyaeva, S. (2009). Spatial Econometric Analysis of Foreign Direct Investment Determinants in Russian Regions, World Economy, 324: 643–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Ledyaeva, S. and Linden, M. (2006). Testing for FDI Gravity Model in Russian Regions, Working Paper No. 32/06, Department of Business and Economics, University of Joensuu.Google Scholar
  64. Licht, A.N. and Siegel, J.I. (2006). The Social Dimensions of Entrepreneurship. In Casson, M., Bernard, Y., Basu, A. and Wadeson, N. (Eds.) Oxford Handbook of Entrepreneurship. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press: 511–39.Google Scholar
  65. Lipsey, R.E. and Sjoholm, F. (2005). The Impact of Inward FDI on Host Countries: Why So Different Answers? In Moran, T., Graham, E. and Blomstrom, M. (Eds.) Does FDI Promote Development? Washington, DC: Institute of International Economics: 23–43.Google Scholar
  66. Liu, X. and White, S. (2001). Comparing Innovation Systems: A Framework and Application to China’s Transitional Context, Research Policy, 307: 1091–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Love, J. and Roper, S. (1999). The Determinants of Innovation: R&D, Technology Transfer and Networking Effects, Review of Industrial Organisation, 15: 43–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Lundvall, B.-A. (1992). (Eds.) National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. London: Pinter Publishers.Google Scholar
  69. Lundvall, B.-A. (1998) Why Study National Systems and National Styles of Innovation, Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 104: 407–21.Google Scholar
  70. Lundvall, B.-A. (2007). National Innovation System: Analytical Focusing Device and Policy Learning Tool, Working Paper R2007: 004, Swedish Institute for Growth Policy Studies.Google Scholar
  71. Mancusi, M.L. (2008). International Spillovers and Absorptive Capacity: A Cross-country Cross-Sector Analysis Based on Patents and Citation, Journal of International Economics, 76: 155–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. McCarthy, D.J. and Puffer, S.M. (1997). Strategic Investment Flexibility for MNE Success in Russia, Journal of World Business, 324: 293–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Meyer, K.E (2004). Perspectives on Multinational Enterprises in Emerging Economies, Journal of International Business Studies, 34(4): 259–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Michaelides, P.G., Economakis, G.E., Milios, J.G., Maroudas, L. and Aggelis, V. (2004). Growth and Technological Change in the Russian Economy: A Contribution to the Investigation of Russia’s Economic Crisis, Journal of Economics and Business, 7(2): 39–62.Google Scholar
  75. Nee, V. (1996). The Emergence of a Market Society: Changing Mechanisms of Stratification in China, The American Journal of Sociology, 101(4): 908–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Nelson, R.R. (1993). National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  77. Niosi, J. (2002). National Systems of Innovation Are ‘X-Efficient’ (and X-Effective): Why Some Are Slow Learners, Research Policy, 31: 291–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. North, D. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance, Political Economy of Institutions and Decisions. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. North, D. (2000). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance, Political Economy of Institutions and Decisions. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  80. North D. (2005). Understanding the Process of Economic Change. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. OECD, Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (2004). Science and Innovation Policy: Key Challenges and Opportunities, Geneva.Google Scholar
  82. Ponomareva, N. (2000). Are There Positive or Negative Spillovers from Foreign-Owned to Domestic Firms? Working Paper #BSP/00/042, Moscow.Google Scholar
  83. Popov, V. (2001). Reform Strategies and Economic Performance of Russia’s Regions, World Development, 29: 865–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Porter, M.E. (1990). The Competitive Advantage of Nations. New York: Free Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Puffer, S. and McCarthy, D. (2001). Navigating the Hostile Maze: A Framework for Russian Entrepreneurship, Academy of Management Executive, 15(4): 24–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Radosevic, S. (2002). Patterns of Preservation, Restructuring and Survival: Science and Technology Policy in Russia in Post-Soviet Era, Research Policy, 306: 1105–24.Google Scholar
  87. Rogers, E.M. (1998). The Definition and Measurement of Innovation, Melbourne Institute Working Paper, N 10/98.Google Scholar
  88. Sachs, J.D. and Warner, A.M. (1999). Natural Resource Intensity and Economic Growth. In Mayer, J., Chambers, B. and Farooq, A. (Eds.) Development Policies in Natural Resource Economies. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar: 13–38.Google Scholar
  89. Sachs, J.D. and Warner, A.M. (2001). Natural Resources and Economic Development: The Curse of Natural Resources, European Economic Review, 45: 827–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Sartori, A. (2003). An Estimator for Some Binary-Outcome Selection Models Without Exclusion Restrictions, Political Analysis, 11: 111–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Schmookler, J. (1966). Invention and Economic Growth. Harvard, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Schwab, K. (Eds.) (2012). The Global Competitiveness Report 2011–2012, Davos: World Economic Forum.Google Scholar
  93. Shleifer, A. and Vishny, R.W. (1999). The Grabbing Hand: Government Pathologies and their Cures. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  94. Smarzynska, J.B. (2004). Does Foreign Direct Investment Increases the Productivity of Domestic Firms? In Search of Spillovers Through Backward Linkages, American Economic Review, 94(3): 605–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Smith, N. and Thomas, E. (2014). The Impact of Regional Conditions on Innovation in Russia, Working Paper.Google Scholar
  96. Stijns, J.-P.C. (2005). Natural Resource Abundance and Economic Growth Revisited, Resources Policy, 30(2): 107–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. UNCTAD, United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (2008). World Investment Report. Geneva: UNCTAD.Google Scholar
  98. Wang, J.Y. and Blomström, M. (1992). Foreign Investment and Technology Transfer: A Simple Model, European Economic Review, 36(1): 137–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Wolff, E.N. (2002). How Stagnant Are Services? In J. Gadrey and F. Gallouj (Eds.) Productivity, Innovation and Knowledge in Services. Cheltenham: Elgar: 3–25.Google Scholar
  100. Yudaeva, K., Kozlov, K., Melentieva, N. and Ponomareva, N. (2003). Does Foreign Ownership Matter? The Economics of Transition, 11(3): 386–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Zsuzsa, L. (2003). Attraction Versus Repulsion — Foreign Direct Investment in Russia, Development and Finance, 1: 51–62.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Natalya Smith and Ekaterina Thomas 2015

Authors and Affiliations

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations