Achievement Tests for Literary Reading in General EFL Reading Courses

  • Takayuki Nishihara
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter presents a discussion of how to use literary texts in achievement tests for general EFL reading courses based on my testing practice at a Japanese university, where learners at different English proficiency levels are enrolled. Although the use of literary texts for foreign language teaching has been examined in various contexts, most investigations reported in the literature have been done from a teaching perspective, presenting teaching procedures. Although some innovative proposals for literature testing have been presented recently (for example, Spiro, 2010), they tend to assess integrative language performance, of which literary reading is only one component. This chapter presents a discussion of how to address literary reading itself and to assess its multifarious aspects (also see Chapter 8 by Oku and Chapter 19 by Lambrou). I argue that achievement tests using literary texts need to differ from those with expository texts or practical texts such as e-mails and menus. Simultaneously, they should include both test items for general reading comprehension and those for genre-specific traits.

Keywords

Test Item Postpartum Depression Achievement Test Testing Practice Literary Text 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alderson, J. (2000) Assessing Reading. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bachman, L. F. (1990). Fundamental Considerations in Language Testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bachman, L. and Palmer, A. (2010) Language Assessment in Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bierwisch, M. ( 1970 [1965]) ‘Poetics and Linguistics’, trans. P. H. Salus, in D. C. Freeman (ed.) Linguistics and Literary Style, 96–115. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
  5. Brumfit, C. (1991) ‘Testing Literature’, in C. Brumfit (ed.) Assessment in Literature Teaching, 1–8. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  6. Brumfit, C. J. and Killam, G. D. (1986) ‘Proposed Examination Paper’, in C. J. Brumfit and R. A. Carter (eds) Literature and Language Teaching, 253–255. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Carter, R. (2007) ‘Literature and Language Teaching 1986–2006: A Review’, International Journal of Applied Linguistics 17 (1): 3–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carter, R. and Long, M. (1990) ‘Testing Literature in EFL Classes: Tradition and Innovation’, ELT Journal 44 (3): 215–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Celce-Murcia, M., Dörnyei, Z. and Thurrell, S. (1995) ‘Communicative Competence: A Pedagogically Motivated Model with Content Specifications’, Issues in Applied Linguistics 6 (2): 5–35.Google Scholar
  10. Culler, J. (1975) Structuralist Poetics: Structuralism, Linguistics and the Study of Literature. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Durán, R. (1988) ‘Validity and Language Skills Assessment: Non-English Background Students’, in H. Wainer and H. Braun (eds) Test Validity, 105–127. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  12. Fish, S. (1980) Is There a Text in This Class?: The Authority of Interpretive Communities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Grinder, J. T. and Elgin, S. H. (1973) Guide to Transformational Grammar: History, Theory, Practice. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
  14. Halász, L. (1996) ‘General and Personal Meaning in Literary Reading’, in R. J. Kreuz and M. S. MacNealy (eds) Empirical Approaches to Literature and Aesthetics, 379–396. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
  15. Hall, G. (2005) Literature in Language Education. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hanauer, D. (1996) ‘Academic Literary Competence Testing’, Journal of Literary Semantics 25 (2): 142–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hanauer, D. (1997) ‘Poetic Text Processing’, Journal of Literary Semantics 26 (3): 57–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hanauer, D. (1998) ‘The Genre-specific Hypothesis of Reading: Reading Poetry and Encyclopedic Items’, Poetics 26 (2): 63–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hawkey, M. and Rezk, L. G. (1991) ‘Developing Literary Competence: A “Skills” Approach to Teaching and Testing Literature’, in C. Brumfit (ed.) Assessment in Literature Teaching, 84–92. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  20. Hayase, H. and Egashira, R. (eds) (2010). Let’s Learn English from American Literature. Tokyo: Eihosha.Google Scholar
  21. Henning, S. D. (1992) ‘Assessing Literary Interpretation Skills’, Foreign Language Annals 25 (4): 339–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hirvela, A. (1996) ‘Reader-Response Theory and ELT’, ELT Journal 50 (2): 127–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. McRae, J. (1991) Literature with a Small ‘l’. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  24. Miall, D. S. (2006) Literary Reading: Empirical and Theoretical Studies. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  25. Miall, D. S. and Kuiken, D. (1999) ‘What is Literariness? Three Components of Literary Reading’, Discourse Processes 28 (2): 121–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Paran, A. (2010) ‘Between Scylla and Charybdis: The Dilemmas of Testing Language and Literature’, in A. Paran and L. Sercu (eds) Testing the Untestable in Language Education, 143–164. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  27. Parkinson, B. and Thomas, H. R. (2000) Teaching Literature in a Second Language. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Purves, A. C. (1990) ‘Testing Literature: The Current State of Affairs’, in Office of Educational Research and Improvement (ed.) Testing and Assessment. Special Collection 1, 1–2. Bloomington, IN: ERIC Clearinghouse on Reading and Communication Skills.Google Scholar
  29. Purves, A. C. (1992) ‘Testing Literature’, in J. A. Langer (ed.) Literature Instruction: A Focus on Student Response, 19–34. Urbana, IL: NCTE.Google Scholar
  30. Riffaterre, M. (1978) Semiotics of Poetry. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Saito, Y., Muroi, M., Nakamura, T. and Kaiki, Y. (2004) ‘Literary Texts Are the Best Teaching Materials: How Can They Be Used in English Classes? [Bungakukoso Sairyono Kyouzai: Eigonojugyoni Douikasuka]’, The English Teachers’ Magazine 53 (8): 6–14.Google Scholar
  32. Schauber, E. and Spolsky, E. (1986) The Bounds of Interpretation: Linguistic Theory and Literary Text. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Spiro, J. (1991) ‘Assessing Literature: Four Papers’, in C. Brumfit (ed.) Assessment in Literature Teaching, 16–83. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  34. Spiro, J. (2010) ‘Crossing the Bridge from Appreciative Reader to Reflective Writer: The Assessment of Creative Process’, in A. Paran and L. Sercu (eds) Testing the Untestable in Language Education, 165–190. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  35. van Peer, W. (1986) Stylistics and Psychology: Investigations of Foregrounding. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
  36. Vipond, D. and Hunt, R. A. (1984) ‘Point-Driven Understanding: Pragmatic and Cognitive Dimensions of Literary Reading’, Poetics 13 (3): 261–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Zwaan, R. A. (1993) Aspects of Literary Comprehension. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Zyngier, S. and Fialho, O. (2010). ‘Pedagogical Stylistics, Literary Awareness and Empowerment: A Critical Perspective’, Language and Literature 19 (1): 13–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Takayuki Nishihara 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Takayuki Nishihara

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations