Leadership Elections and Democracy in the British Labour Party

  • Emmanuelle Avril
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Political Leadership book series (PSPL)

Abstract

The stark contrast between the marathon race to succeed Gordon Brown after he stood down as Labour Party leader in May 2010 and the bypassing of the Electoral College to appoint Brown in 2007, both of which triggered heated debates about the victor’s authority and legitimacy as Labour Party leader, provide an interesting entry point into Labour Party leadership elections. Ed Miliband’s subsequent struggle to counter his ‘Old Labour’ image with little legitimacy within his own party, followed by a complete overhaul of leadership election rules on 1 March 2014, also highlight the paramount importance of processes on perceptions of leaders. If we track the series of constitutional changes in the Labour Party since the 1980s, we see that leadership elections have increasingly been underpinned by a double imperative: on the one hand the need to choose a credible party leader and potential Prime Minister, and on the other the need to meet the requirements of internal democracy. This highlights the fundamental tension at work in any organisation between outcome and process and even more so in a political party committed, at least in theory, to the egalitarian principle: the Labour Party was created at the turn of the twentieth century as a coalition of various groups, among which trade unions played a major part, and as a result adopted a federal structure whereby the various stakeholders of the party were represented in the decision-making bodies, especially at the annual conference, the supreme authority in the Party.

Keywords

Trade Union Leadership Election Party Leader Party Member Labour Party 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Work cited

  1. Alderman, K., Carter, N. (1995) ‘The Labour Leadership and Deputy Leadership Elections of 1994’, Parliamentary Affairs, Vol. 48, n° 3, 438–55.Google Scholar
  2. Avril, E. (2007) Du Labour au New Labour: Le changement vu de l’intérieur (Villeneuve d’Ascq: Presses Universitaires du Septentrion).Google Scholar
  3. Avril, E. (2013) ‘The Evolution of Decision-Making in the British Labour Party: From Grassroots to Netroots?’. In Avril, E., Zumello, C. (eds) New Technologies, Organizational Change and Governance (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan), pp. 102–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bartle, J., Crewe, I. (2002) ‘The impact of party leaders in Britain: Strong assumptions, weak evidence’. In King, A. (ed.) Leaders’ Personalities and the Outcomes of Democratic Elections (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
  5. BBC News (2005, 21 July) ‘On This Day 1950–2005: 21 July 1994: Labour Chooses Blair’. Retrieved from http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/dates/stories/july/21/newsid_2515000/2515825.stm [accessed 02/07/2014].Google Scholar
  6. Bean, C., Mughan, A. (1989) ‘Leadership Effects in Parliamentary Elections in Australia and Britain’, American Political Science Review, 83, 1165–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blair, T. (2003, 30 September) Speech to the Labour Party Annual Conference.Google Scholar
  8. Blondel, J., Thiebault, J.-L. (eds) (2009) Political Leadership, Parties and Citizens: The Personalisation of Leadership (London: Routledge).Google Scholar
  9. Collins, R. (2014) Building A One Nation Labour Party. The Collins Review into Labour Party Reform (London: The Labour Party).Google Scholar
  10. Crewe, I., King, A. (1999) ‘Did Major win? Did Kinnock lose? Leadership effects in the 1992 election’. In Heath, A., Jowell, R., Curtice, J., Taylor, B. (eds) Labour’s Last Chance? The 1992 Election and Beyond (Aldershot: Dartmouth).Google Scholar
  11. Curtice, J., Holmberg, S. (2005) ‘Party Leaders and Party Choice’. In Thomassen, J. (ed.) The European Voter (Oxford University Press), pp. 235–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Denver, D. (1989) Elections and Voting Behaviour in Britain (Deddington: Philip Allan).Google Scholar
  13. Denver, D. (1997) ‘Elections and Voting Behaviour’. In Robins, L.J., Jones, B. (eds) Half a Century of British Politics (Manchester: Manchester University Press), pp. 128–43.Google Scholar
  14. Denver, D. (1998) ‘The Government that Could Do No Right’. In King, A. (ed.) New Labour Triumphs: Labour At the Polls (London: Chatham House).Google Scholar
  15. Dorey, P., Denham, A. (2011) ‘O brother where art thou?’ The Labour Leadership of 2010, British Politics, Vol. 6, n°3, 286–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Drucker, H.M. (1979) Doctrine and Ethos in the Labour Party (London; Boston: Allen & Unwin).Google Scholar
  17. Evans, G., Andersen, R. (2005) ‘The Impact of Party Leaders: How Blair Lost Labour Votes’, Parliamentary Affairs, Vol. 58, n° 4, 818–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Faucher-King, R, Treille, E. (2003) ‘Managing Intra-party Democracy: Comparing the French Socialist and British Labour Party Conferences’, Trench Politics, Vol. 1, n° 1, 61–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Foley, M. (2002) John Major, Tony Blair and the Conflict of Leadership: Collision Course (Manchester: Manchester University Press).Google Scholar
  20. Franklin, B., Larsen, G. (1994) ‘Kingmaking in the Labour Leadership Contest’, British Journalism Review, Vol. 5, n° 4, 63–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hay, C. (2003) ‘How to Study the Labour Party? Contextual, Analytical and Theoretical Issues.’ In Callaghan, J., Fielding, S., Ludlam, S. (eds) Interpreting the Labour Party, Approaches to Labour Politics and History (Manchester: Manchester University Press), pp. 182–94.Google Scholar
  22. Heppell, T. (2010) ‘Labour Leadership Elections from Wilson to Brown: Ideological Factions and Succession Planning Strategies’, Representation, Vol. 46, n° 1, 69–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Heppell, T. (2012) Choosing the Labour Leader. Labour Party Leadership Elections from Wilson to Brown (London: Tauris Academic Studies).Google Scholar
  24. Jobson, R., Wickham-Jones, M. (2011). ‘Reinventing the block vote? Trade unions and the 2010 Labour party leadership election’, British Politics, 6, 317–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kettle, M. (2009, 7 May). ‘A Leader Picked by Unions is an Explosive Trap for Labour’, The Guardian. Retrieved from http://www.theguardian.com/commentis free/2009/may/07/tradeunions-labour [accessed 02/07/2014].Google Scholar
  26. King, A. (1998). ‘Why Labour Won — At Last’. In King, A. (ed.), New Labour Triumphs: Labour At the Polls (London: Chatham House).Google Scholar
  27. King, A. (2002) Leaders’ Personalities and the Outcome of Democratic Elections (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. King, O. (2013, 24 July) ‘Ed Miliband’s trade union reforms are essential to building a fairer society’, New Statesman. Retrieved from http://www.newstatesman.com/staggers/2013/07/ed-milibands-trade-union-reforms-are-essential-building-fairer-society [accessed 02/07/2014].Google Scholar
  29. Kogan, D., Kogan, M. (1982) The Battle for the Labour Party (London: Kogan Page).Google Scholar
  30. Lasswell, H.D. (1948) Power and Personality (New York: W.W. Norton & Co).Google Scholar
  31. Lees-Marshment, J. (2001). Political Parties and British Political Parties: The Party’s Just Begun (Manchester: Manchester University Press).Google Scholar
  32. Mair, P. (1994) ‘Party Organizations: from Civil Society to State’. In Katz, R., Mair, P. (eds) How Parties Organize: Change and Adaptation in Party Organizations in Western Democracies (London: Sage).Google Scholar
  33. McSmith, A. (1997) Faces of Labour: the Inside Story (London: Verso).Google Scholar
  34. Minkin, L. (1991) The Contentious Alliance: Trade Unions and the Labour Party (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press).Google Scholar
  35. Minkin, L. (2014) The Blair Supremacy. A Study in the Politics of Labour’s Party Management (Manchester: Manchester University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mughan, A. (2000) Media and the Presidentialization of Parliamentary Elections (Basingstoke: Palgrave).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Norris, P. (2002) ‘Campaign Communication’. In Leduc, L., Niemi, R.G. (eds) Comparing Democracies 2: New Challenges in the Study of Elections and Voting (London: Sage).Google Scholar
  38. Panitch, L., Leys, C. (1997) The End of Parliamentary Socialism (London: Verso).Google Scholar
  39. Pemberton, H., Wickham-Jones, M. (2012) ‘Brothers all? The Operation of the Electoral College in the 2010 Labour Leadership Contest’, Parliamentary Affairs, 66, 708–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Punnett, M. (2006) ‘Selecting the Party Leader in Britain: A Limited Participatory Revolution’, European Journal of Political Research, Vol. 24, n° 3, 257–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Quinn, T. (2004) ‘Electing the Leader: The British Labour Party’s Electoral College’, British Journal of Politics and International Relations, Vol. 6, n° 3, 333–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Quinn, T. (2012) Electing and Ejecting Party Leaders in Britain (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Russell, M. (2005) Building New Labour: The Politics of Party Organisation (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Scarrow, S. (2005) ‘Political Parties and Democracy: Theoretical and Practical perspectives’, National Democratic Institute for International Affairs, Implementing Intra-Party Democracy, 2005, p.9. Retrieved from http://www.ndi.org/files/1951_polpart_scarrow_110105.pdf [accessed 02/07/2014].Google Scholar
  45. Seyd, P., Whiteley, P. (1992) Labour’s Grass Roots: The Politics of Party Membership (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar
  46. Seyd, P., Whiteley, P. (2002) New Labour’s Grassroots: The Transformation of the Labour Party Membership (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Stark, L. (1996) Choosing a Leader: Party Leadership Contests in Britain from Macmillan to Blair (New York: Saint Martin’s Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Webb, P. (1994) ‘Reforming the Labour Party-Trade Union Link: An Assessment’, Journal of Elections, Public Opinion & Parties, Vol. 4, n° 1, 1–14.Google Scholar
  49. Webb, P. (2000) The Modern Party System (London: Sage).Google Scholar
  50. Wickham-Jones, M. (2014) ‘Introducing OMOV: The Labour Party-Trade Union Review Group and the 1994 Leadership Contest’, British Journal of Industrial Relations, Vol. 52, n° 1, 33–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wintour, P. (2010, 27 September) ‘Ed Miliband pledges to lead Labour from the front — but will David follow?’, The Guardian. Retrieved from http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2010/sep/26/ed-miliband-david-labour-leader[accessed 02/07/2014].Google Scholar
  52. Wring, D. (2005) The Politics of Marketing the Labour Party (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Emmanuelle Avril 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Emmanuelle Avril

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations