Advertisement

June 4: History and Memory in Exile

  • Rowena Xiaoqing He
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Oral History book series (PSOH)

Abstract

The 1989 Tiananmen Movement, known in Chinese simply as “Liu Si” (June Fourth), was the most serious open conflict between the Communist regime and the Chinese people since the establishment of the People’s Republic of China in 1949. On the surface Tiananmen seems to be remote and irrelevant to the reality of the “rising China,” but every year on its anniversary, the government clamps down with intense security and meticulous surveillance. Tiananmen Mothers are still prohibited from openly mourning their family members, exiles are still turned away when they try to return home to visit a sick parent or to attend a loved one’s funeral, and scholars working on the topic are regularly denied visas. The Beijing regime has been remarkably, if temporarily, successful in enforcing its official account of 1989 within China, justifying the military crackdown as necessary for stability and prosperity and for countering a Western conspiracy to divide and weaken China. June Fourth encapsulates the relationship between history and memory, power and politics, and intellectual freedom and human rights in the Chinese context. Indeed, it is not possible to understand today’s China and its relationship with the world without understanding the spring of 1989.

Keywords

Chinese Student Chinese Communist Party Oral History Student Leader House Arrest 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 2.
    Ardra L. Cole and J. Gary Knowles, Lives in Context: The Art of Life History Research ( Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press, 2001 )Google Scholar
  2. Carola Conle, “Why Narrative? Which Narrative? Struggling with Time and Place in Life and Research,” Curriculum Inquiry 29 (1) (1999), 7–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Corrine Glesne and Alan Peshkin, Becoming Qualitative Researchers: An Introduction ( White Plains, NY: Longman, 1992 )Google Scholar
  4. J. Amos Hatch and Richard Wisniewski, eds., Life History and Narrative ( London: Falmer Press, 1995 ).Google Scholar
  5. 6.
    Bao Pu, Renee Chiang, and Adi Ignatius, eds., Prisoner of the State: The Secret Journal of Premier Zhao Ziyang ( New York: Simon & Schuster, 2009 ), p. 5.Google Scholar
  6. 7.
    Guobin Yang, “Emotional Events and the Transformation of Collective Action: The Chinese Student Movement,” in Helena Flam and Debra King, eds., Emotions and Social Movements (London: Routledge, 2005), pp. 79–98.Google Scholar
  7. 10.
    Timothy Brook, Quelling the People: The Military Suppression of the Beijing Democracy Movement ( Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1998 ), p. 37.Google Scholar
  8. 11.
    George Black and Robin Munro, Black Hands of Beijing: Lives of Defiance in China’s Democracy Movement ( New York: John Wiley, 1993 ).Google Scholar
  9. 12.
    Orville Schell, Mandate of Heaven: The Legacy of Tiananmen Square and the Next Generation of China’s Leaders ( New York: Simon & Schuster, 1994 ), p. 216.Google Scholar
  10. 14.
    Craig Calhoun, Neither Gods nor Emperors: Students and the Struggle for Democracy in China ( Berkeley: University of California Press, 1994 ), p. 5.Google Scholar
  11. 15.
    Asia Watch, “Punishment Season: Human Rights in China after Martial Law,” in George Hicks, ed., The Broken Mirror: China after Tiananmen ( Essex: Longman Current Affairs, 1990 ), p. 383.Google Scholar
  12. 22.
    An Zhiguo, “Notes from the Editors: On the Events in Beijing,” Beijing Review 32 (26) (June 26–July 2, 1989), 4.Google Scholar
  13. 24.
    Zhong Bu, ed., Xinshiqi zui ke’ai de ren: Beijing jieyan budui yingxiong lu [The Most Beloved Men in the New Era: List of Heroes of the Beijing Martial Law Enforcement Troops] (Beijing: Guangming Daily Press, 1989 ).Google Scholar
  14. 27.
    Ding Zilin, Xunfang liusi shounanzhe [In Search of the Victims of June 4] (Hong Kong: Open Press, 2005 ), p. 84.Google Scholar
  15. 31.
    Liu Xiaobo, “Listen Carefully to the Voices of the Tiananmen Mothers,” in Perry Link, Tienchi Martin-Liao, and Liu Xia, eds., No Enemies, No Hatred: Selected Essays and Poems ( Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2012 ), p. 6.Google Scholar
  16. 35.
    Jeffrey F. Meyer, “Moral Education in the People’s Republic of China,” Moral Education Forum 15(2) (1990), 3–26Google Scholar
  17. Ronald Price, “Moral-Political Education and Modernization,” in Ruth Hayhoe, ed., Education and Modernization: The Chinese Experience (Oxford: Pergamon Press, 2002), pp. 211–237Google Scholar
  18. Stanley Rosen, “The Effect of Post-4 June Re-education Campaigns on Chinese Students,” The China Quarterly, No. 134 (1993), 310–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. State Education Commission, Zhongxue deyu gangyao [Secondary Education Moral Education Guidelines] ( Shanghai: Shanghai Education Press, 1995 )Google Scholar
  20. State Education Commission, Xiaoxue deyu gangyao [Primary Moral Education Guidelines] ( Shanghai: Shanghai Education Press, 1993 ).Google Scholar
  21. 37.
    Christopher R. Hughes, Chinese Nationalism in the Global Era ( London: Routledge, 2006 ).Google Scholar
  22. 38.
    Edward Vickers, “The Opportunity of China? Education, Patriotic Values and the Chinese State,” in Marie Lall and Edward Vickers, eds., Education as a Political Tool in Asia (New York: Routledge, 2009), pp. 69–70.Google Scholar
  23. Gregory P. Fairbrother, “Patriotic Education in a Chinese Middle School,” in W. O. Lee et al., eds., Citizenship Education in Asia and the Pacific: Concepts and Issues (Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic, 2004), p. 161.Google Scholar
  24. 40.
    Wang, Zheng, Never Forget National Humiliation: Historical Memory in Chinese Politics and Foreign Relations ( New York: Columbia University Press, 2012 ).Google Scholar
  25. 41.
    Monica Waterhouse, “A Pedagogy of Mourning: Tarrying with/in Tragedy, Terror, and Tension,” Transnational Curriculum Inquiry 5 (2) (2008), 19.Google Scholar
  26. 43.
    Gong Yue, “Xiagan yidan xie chunqiu: Ji huanying ‘huangque xingdong’ muhou yingxiong chendaizheng zuotanhui” [Forum on the Unsung Heroes of “Operation Yellowbird,” Beijing zhichun [Beijing Spring], No. 170 (July 2007), 75–78.Google Scholar
  27. 45.
    Chai, Ling, A Heart for Freedom ( Carol Stream, IL: Tyndale House, 2011 ), p. 241.Google Scholar
  28. 46.
    Andrew J. Nathan, “The Dissenting Life,” The New Republic , January 14, 2002, 37–41.Google Scholar
  29. 47.
    Geremie R. Barmé, In the Red: On Contemporary Chinese Culture (New York: Columbia University Press, 1999), pp. 44–45.Google Scholar
  30. 48.
    Denise Chong, Egg On Mao: The Story of an Ordinary Man Who Defaced an Icon and Unmasked a Dictatorship ( Berkeley, CA: Counterpoint, 2009 ).Google Scholar
  31. 49.
    Jim Yardley, “Man Freed after Years in Jail for Mao Insult,” The New York Times, February 23, 2006.Google Scholar
  32. 53.
    Richard Madsen, China and the American Dream: A Moral Inquiry ( Berkeley: University of California Press, 1995 ).Google Scholar
  33. 54.
    J. D. Brewer, “Sensitivity as a Problem in Field Research: A Study of Routine Policing in Northern Ireland,” in Claire M. Renzetti and Raymond M. Lee, eds., Researching Sensitive Topics (Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, 1993), pp. 123–145.Google Scholar
  34. 62.
    Gwendolyn Etter-Lewis, My Soul Is My Own: Oral Narratives of African American Women in the Professions (New York: Routledge, 1993), p. xii.Google Scholar
  35. 63.
    Bernhard Giesen, Triumph and Trauma ( London: Paradigm, 2004 ), p. 2.Google Scholar
  36. 64.
    Charles Taylor, Sources of the Self: The Making of the Modern Identity ( Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1989 ), p. 211.Google Scholar
  37. 65.
    William F. Pinar, “Whole, Bright, Deep with Understanding: Issues in Qualitative Research and Autobiographical Method,” Journal of Curriculum Studies 13 (3) (1981), 184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 66.
    Carola Conle, “Resonance in Preservice Teacher Inquiry,” American Educational Research Journal 33 (2) (1996), 52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 67.
    Ivor F. Goodson, ed., Studying Teachers’ Lives ( London: Routledge, 1992 ), p. 6.Google Scholar
  40. 69.
    D. J. Clandinin and F. M. Connelly, “Personal Experience Method,” in Norman K. Denzin and Yvonna S. Lincoln, eds., Handbook of Qualitative Research ( Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1994 ), p. 4.Google Scholar
  41. 70.
    C. T. Patrick Diamond and Carol A. Mullen, The Postmodern Educator: Arts-Based Inquiries and Teacher Development ( New York: Peter Lang, 1999 ).Google Scholar
  42. 71.
    William Pinar, What Is Curriculum Theory?(Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2004 ).Google Scholar
  43. 73.
    Patricia Hampls, “Memory and Imagination,” in James McConkey, ed., The Anatomy of Memory: An Anthology ( Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996 ), p. 209.Google Scholar
  44. 76.
    Karl D. Hostetler, “What Is ‘Good’ Education Research?” Educational Researcher 34 (6) (2005), 21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Rowena Xiaoqing He 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rowena Xiaoqing He

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations