Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Applied Quantitative Finance series ((AQF))

  • 1729 Accesses

Abstract

Models for measuring market risk have a longer history and have been so far subject to more detailed and extensive scrutiny than credit risk models. This is certainly due to the fact that regulatory prescriptions have been in place for longer (BCBS, 1996), but it is also due to the nature of market risk and, as a consequence, of market risk models. Market risk factors are in fact, for the most part, observable, which is not, in general, the case for other types of risk, and historical time series are available that allow extensively for both calibration and testing. Furthermore, although this advantage is off-traded by the complexity of portfolios, market risk assessment can build on the results of pricing and valuation models, which are readily available for a large number of financial instruments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Acerbi, G., “Spectral Measures of Risk: A Coherent Representation of Subjective Risk Aversion,” Journal of Banking and Finance, Vol. 26, No. 7, 1505–1518, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Artzner, P., Delbaen, F., Eber, J.-M. and Heath, D., “Coherent Measures of Risk,” Mathematical Finance, Vol. 9, 203–228, 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, “Amendment to the Capital Accord to Incorporate Market Risks,” Basel, January 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, “Supervisory Framework for the Use of ‘Backtesting’ in Conjunction with the Internal Models Approach to Market Risk Capital Requirements,” Basel, January 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, “Revision to the Basel II Market Risk Framework,” Basel, February 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkowitz, J., “Testing Density Forecasts With Applications to Risk Management,” Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, Vol. 19, 465–474, 2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, S. D., “A Review of Backtesting and Backtesting Procedures,” Finance and Economics Discussion Series, Divisions of Research & Statistics and Monetary Affairs, Federal Reserve Board, Washington, D.G, 2005, 21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christoffersen, P., “Evaluating Interval Forecasts,” International Economic Review, Vol. 39, 841–862, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cotter, J. and Dowd, K., Evaluating the Precision of Estimators of Quantile-Based Risk Measures, MPRA Paper 3504, University Library of Munich, Germany, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crnkovic, G. and Drachman, J., “Quality Control,” in VaR: Understanding and Applying Value-at-Risk, Risk Publications, London, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damodaran, A., Strategic Risk Taking: A Framework for Risk Management, Pearson Education, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diebold, E. X., Gunther, T. and Tay, A., “Evaluating Density Forecasts with Applications to Financial Risk Management,” International Economic Review, Vol. 39, 863–883, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dowd, K., “Retrospective Assessment of Value-at-Risk”, in Ong, M. (editor), Risk Management: A Modern Perspective, Elsevier, 2006, 183–202.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dowd, K., “A Moments-based Procedure for Evaluating Risk Forecasting Models”, in Christodoulakis, G. and Satchell, S. (editors), The Analytics of Risk Model Validation, Academic Press, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holton, G. A., Value at Risk: Theory and Practice, Academic Press, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kupiec, P., “Techniques for Verifying the Accuracy of Risk Management Models,” Journal of Derivatives, Vol. 3, 73–84, 1995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lopez, J. A., “Regulatory Evaluation of Value-at-Risk Models,” Journal of Risk, Vol. 1, 37–64, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morini, M., Understanding and Managing Model Risk, Wiley, 2011.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Perignon, C. and Smith, D.R., “A New Approach to Comparing VaR Estimation Methods,” The Journal of Derivatives, Vol. 16, No. 2, 54–66, Winter 2008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pritsker, M., “Evaluating Value-at-Risk Methodologies: Accuracy versus Computational Time,” in Gibson, R. (editor), Model Risk: Concepts, Calibration and Pricing, Risk Books, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Satchell, S., “The Validation of Equity Portfolio Risk Models,” in Christodoulakis, G. and Satchell, S. (editors), The Analytics of Risk Model Validation, Academic Press, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wehn, C., “Market Risk Modelling: Approaches to Assessing Model Adequacy,” in Rösch, D. and Scheule, H. (editors), Model Risk: Identification, Measurement and Management, Risk Books, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2016 Sergio Scandizzo

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Scandizzo, S. (2016). Value at Risk Models. In: The Validation of Risk Models. Applied Quantitative Finance series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137436962_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics