Academic Leadership in the Nordic Countries: Patterns of Gender Equality

  • Rómulo Pinheiro
  • Lars Geschwind
  • Hanne Foss Hansen
  • Elias Pekkola

Abstract

It is widely acknowledged that the Nordic countries rank highly when it comes to the role of women in the labor market. Equality of opportunity on gender grounds has been a central topic in the labor policy agendas of many Nordic governments since the late 1960s and the early 1970s. Notwithstanding this trend, studies reveal that there are still substantial gender imbalances in the academic profession, most notably when it comes to representation at the highest levels of the organization (institutional governance) and/or academic status. Thus, the rationale for this chapter is to take critical stock, both quantitatively and qualitatively, of the role of women in Nordic academia — Norway, Sweden, Denmark, and Finland — with a special emphasis on their role at the highest governance and managerial levels. The chapter has three major aims. First, it will illuminate the key figures (official statistics and authors’ own data) regarding the gender split throughout the academic career path, as well as female representation in university senior management. Second, it will provide a comparison of policies — at the macro (government) and meso (case institutions) levels — aimed at reducing the gender gap within Nordic academia. Third, it will cast a critical light — by drawing upon new qualitative datasets — on the backgrounds and experiences of a number of senior female leaders at selected case institutions, with a particular emphasis on career trajectories and structural and cultural barriers.

Keywords

Gender Equality Affirmative Action Nordic Country Academic Leadership Glass Ceiling 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. R. Bendl and A. Schmidt (2010) “From ‘Glass Ceilings’ to ‘Firewalls’: Different Metaphors for Describing Discrimination,” Gender, Work & Organization, 17(5), 612–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. A. Bryman (2006) Mixed Methods (London: SAGE).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. N. C. Chesler, G. Barabino, S. N. Bhatia and R. Richards-Kortum (2010) “The Pipeline Still Leaks and More Than You Think: A Status Report on Gender Diversity in Biomedical Engineering,” Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 38(5), 1928–1935.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. L. M. Cortina (2008) “Unseen Injustice: Incivility as Modern Discrimination in Organizations,” Academy of Management Review, 33(1), 55–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. D. Dahlerup (2010) Jämställdhet i akademin — en forskningsöversikt (Stockholm: Delegationen för jämställdhet i högskolan)Google Scholar
  6. I. Drori and B. Honig (2013) “A Process Model of Internal and External Legitimacy,” Organization Studies, 34(3), 345–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. L. Engwall (2014) “The Recruitment of University Top Leaders: Politics, Communities and Markets in Interaction,” Scandinavian Journal of Management, 30(3), 332–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. L. Husu (2000) “Gender Discrimination in the Promised Land of Gender Equality,” Higher Education in Europe, 25(2), 221–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. J. E. Karlsen and R. Pritchard (eds.) (2013) Resilient Universities: Confronting Changes in a Challenging World (Oxford: Peter Lang).Google Scholar
  10. Y-J. Lee and D. Won (2014) “Trailblazing Women in Academia: Representation of Women in Senior Faculty and the Gender gap in Junior Faculty’s Salaries in Higher Educational Institutions,” The Social Science Journal, 51(3), 331–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. S. L. Loomes (2014) Recruitment and Selection of Senior Academic Leaders in Australian Universities. PhD dissertation (Wolllongong: University of Wollongong).Google Scholar
  12. J. T. Minor (2014) “Faculty Diversity and the Traditions of Academic Governance,” New Directions for Institutional Research, 2013(159), 49–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Norden (2013) The Nordic Region: A Step Closer to Gender Balance in Research? Joint Nordic Strategies and Measures to Promote Gender Balance among Researchers in Academia Copenhagen: Nordic Council of Ministers.Google Scholar
  14. A. N. Pell (1996) “Fixing the Leaky Pipeline: Women Scientists in Academia,” Journal of Animal Science, 74, 2843–2848.Google Scholar
  15. R. Pinheiro and J. Trondal (2014) “Loose- or Tight-Coupling? Exploring the Interplay between Decoupling, Slack and Resilience in Universities,” European Forum for Studies of Policies for Research and Innovation (EU-SPRI), Manchester, 18–20 June.Google Scholar
  16. E. Rasmussen, M. D. Nielsen and I. Skovsmose (2013) Evaluering af KU’s handlingsplan “Mangfoldighed — flere kvinder i forskning og ledelse” (Copenhagen: Copenhagen University).Google Scholar
  17. B. Rosenbeck (2014) Har videnskaben køn? Kvinder i forskning (København: Museum Tusculanums Forlag).Google Scholar
  18. M. Thornton (1984) “Affirmative Action in Academia,” The Australian Quarterly, 56(2), 120–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. M. van den Brink and Y. Benschop (2012) “Slaying the Seven-Headed Dragon: The Quest for Gender Change in Academia,” Gender, Work & Organization, 19(1), 71–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. M. van den Brink, Y. Benschop and W. Jansen (2010) “Transparency in Academic Recruitment: A Problematic Tool for Gender Equality?,” Organization Studies, 31(11), 1459–1483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. A. Wold and C. Wennerås (1997) “Nepotism and Sexism in Peer Review”, Nature, 387(6631), 341–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Rómulo Pinheiro, Lars Geschwind, Hanne Foss Hansen and Elias Pekkola 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rómulo Pinheiro
  • Lars Geschwind
  • Hanne Foss Hansen
  • Elias Pekkola

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations