Where Are the Female Entrepreneurs in Spain? The Participation of Women in the Spanish University Spin-offs

  • Inmaculada Pastor
  • Ana Acosta
  • Ángel Belzunegui
  • Paloma Pontón


In recent years, both university-related entrepreneurship in general and women’s entrepreneurship in particular have been gaining strength internationally. However, research combining these three components — entrepreneurship, the university, and gender — has not advanced with the same force.


Gender Inequality Female Participation Formalist Discourse Woman Entrepreneur Female Entrepreneur 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. M. Bagues and N. Zinovyeva (2010). “Does Gender Matter for Academic Promotion? Evidence from a Randomised Natural Experiment,” IZA Discussion Paper No. 5537. February 2011. ( Scholar
  2. S. Baines, J. Wheelock and U. Gelder (2003). Riding the Roller Coaster. Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
  3. N. Berg (1997). “Gender, Place and Entrepreneurship,” Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 9(3), 259–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. R. Boden (1999). “Flexible Working Hours, Family Responsibilities, and Female Self-Employment,” American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 58(1), 71–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. I. Brunet, A. Belzunegui and F. Valls, F. (2009). Gènere i creació d’empreses a Catalunya. Tarragona: Publicaciones URV.Google Scholar
  6. B. Clarysse, N. Moray and A. Heirman (2002). Transferring Technology by Spinning Off Ventures: Towards an Empirically Based Understanding of the Spin-off Process. Cent University: Working Paper, January 2002/1.Google Scholar
  7. A. de Bruin, C. Brush and F. Welter (2007). “Advancing a Framework for Coherent Research on Women’s Entrepreneurship,” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 31, 323–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. R. Ely and D. Meyerson (2000). “Theories of Gender in Organizations: A New Approach to Organizational Analysis and Change.” Research in Organizational Behavior, 22, 103–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. H. Etzkowitz (1998). “The Norms of Entrepreneurial Science: Cognitive Effects of the New University-Industry Linkages,” Research Policy, 27(8), 823–833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. H. Etzkowitz (2003). “Research Groups as ‘Quasi-Firms’: The Invention of the Entrepreneurial University,” Research Policy, 32(1), 109–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. H. Etzkowitz, A. Webster, C. Gebhardt and B. Terra (2000). “The Future of the University and the University of the Future: Evolution of Ivory Tower to Entrepreneurial Paradigm,” Research Policy, 29(2), 313–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. F. Ferguson and M. Durup (1998). “Work-Family Conflict and Entrepreneurial Women: A Literature Review,” Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship, 15(1), 30–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. J. Gardiner (1997). Gender, Care and Economics. Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  14. G. George, S. Zahra and D. Wood Jr. (2002). “The Effects of Business-University Alliances on Innovative Output and Financial Performance: A Study of Publicly Traded Biotechnology Companies,” Journal of Business Venturing, 17(6), 577–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. M. Izquierdo (1999). El sexisme a la universitat. Bellaterra: Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Servei de Publicacions.Google Scholar
  16. M. Karataş-Özkan and E. Chell (2013). “Gender Inequalities in Academic Innovation and Enterprise: A Bourdieuian Analysis,” British Journal of Management, 26: 109–125. doi: 10.1111/1467–8551.12020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. D. Libaers, M. Meyer and A. Geuna (2006). “The Role of University Spinout Companies in an Emerging Technology: The Case of Nanotechnology,” The Journal of Technology Transfer, 31(4), 443–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ministerio de Educación, Cultura Deporte (2013). Datos básicos del Sistema universitario español. Curso 2013–2014. Madrid: Secretaría General TécnicaGoogle Scholar
  19. S. Parker (2004). The Economics of Self-Employment and Entrepreneurship. New York: Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. I. Pastor (2011). Cent anys de dones a la universitat. Tarragona: Publicacions URV.Google Scholar
  21. I. Peña, M. Guerrero and J. González-Pernía (2014) Informe ejecutivo GEM España 2013. Madrid: Centro Internacional Santander Emprendimiento.Google Scholar
  22. F. Perelló Tomás (2013). Asimetrías de género en la Universitat de València. Valencia: Universitat de València.Google Scholar
  23. D. Rodeiro Pazos (2008). La creación de empresas en el sistema universitario español. Santiago de Compostela: Universidade de Santiago de Compostela.Google Scholar
  24. D. Rodeiro Pazos, S. López, L. González and A. Sandiñas (2010). “Factores determinantes de la creación de spin-offs universitarias,” Revista Europea de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa, 19(1), 47–68.Google Scholar
  25. P. Rosa and A. Dawson (2006). “Gender and the Commercialization of University Science: Academic Founders of Spinout Companies,” Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 18(4), 341–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. P. Rosa and D. Hamilton (1994). “Gender an Ownership in UK Small Firms,” Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, 18(3),11–28.Google Scholar
  27. I. Sánchez de Madariaga, S. Rica and J. Dolado (2011). Situación de las mujeres en la ciencia español. Madrid: Unidad de Mujeres y Ciencia, Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación.Google Scholar
  28. E. Shaw, S. Carter and J. Brierton (2001). Unequal Entrepreneurs. London: Industrial Society.Google Scholar
  29. P. Stephan and A. El-Ganainy (2007). “The Entrepreneurial Puzzle: Explaining the Gender Gap,” The Journal of Technology Transfer, 32(5), 475–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. M. Vivel, P. Durán, S. Fernández and D. Rodeiro Pazos (2008). “Las barreras al emprendimiento universitario femenino,” Investigaciones de Economía de la Educación, 3, 337–346.Google Scholar
  31. A. Walter, M. Auer and T. Ritter (2006). “The Impact of Network Capabilities and Entrepreneurial Orientation on University Spin-Off Performance,” Journal of Business Venturing, 21(4), 541–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. C. Wenneras and A. Wold (2001). “Nepotism and Sexism in Peer-Review,” In: Women, Science, and Technology: A Reader in Feminist Science Studies. (eds) Mary Wyer, Mary Barbercheck, Donna Geisman, Hatice Oriin Oztiirk and Marta Wayne. New York: Routledge, 46–52.Google Scholar
  33. F. Williams (2004). Rethinking Families. London: Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Inmaculada Pastor, Ana Acosta, Ángel Belzunegui and Paloma Pontón 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Inmaculada Pastor
  • Ana Acosta
  • Ángel Belzunegui
  • Paloma Pontón

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations