Online Peer-to-Peer Lending as a New Profit Industry and Debt Trap

  • Ceylan Cizmeli
  • Mert Demir


The recent financial crisis in the USA has resulted in increased unemployment rates, falling home values and growing household debt. Among the main drivers behind this meltdown are easy to obtain mortgages, student loans and credit cards, which constitute the largest portion of household debt in the USA (Dwyer et al., 2012). Federal student loan volume has increased approximately 833% in the last two decades and consumers now carry more unsecured credit card debt than ever before (Draut, 2005). As of 2010, there were at least six credit cards in circulation for every American family and approximately 80% of households who had credit cards owed more than USD 10,000 in unsecured credit card debt (Woolsey and Schulz, 2009). The role of traditional lenders (e.g. banks) in this trend is of prime concern. The aggressive use of lending practices by these institutions has resulted in an increase of 30% in unsecured credit card debt between 2001 and 2008 (Lawless et al., 2008). Subsequently, credit card debt has become more and more expensive over time, as indicated by the increase in fees that are charged by credit card companies to approximately USD 15 billion in 2009 (White House, 2009).


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Akerlof, G. A. (1970). The market for “lemons”: Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84 (3), 488–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ashta, A. and Assadi, D. (2009). An analysis of European online micro-lending websites. EMN 6th Annual Conference, 33, 4–28. Milan: Fundaciôn Nantik Lum. Retrieved. Scholar
  3. Bachmann, A., Becker, A., Buerckner, D., Hilker, M., Kock, F., Lehmann, M. and Tiburtius, P. (2011). Online peer-to-peer lending–a literature review. Journal of Internet Banking and Commerce, 16 (2), 1–18.Google Scholar
  4. Berger, S. C. and Gleisner, F. (2008). Emergence of financial intermediaries on electronic markets: The case of online P2P lending. Retrieved.
  5. Berger S. C. and Gleisner, F. (2009). Emergence of financial intermediaries on electronic markets: The case of online P2P lending. Business Research, 2 (1), 39–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brill, A. (2010). Peer-to-Peer lending: Innovative Access to Credit and the Consequences of Dodd-Frank. Washington Legal Foundation Backgrounder, Forthcoming. Available at SSRN. Scholar
  7. Ceyhan, S., Shi, X. and Leskovec, J. (2011). Dynamics of bidding in a P2P lending service: Effects of herding and predicting loan success. Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on World Wide Web, 547–556. ISBN: 978–1–4503– 0632–4 doi: 10.1145/1963405.196348 Google Scholar
  8. Chaffee, E. C. and Rapp, G. C. (2012). Regulating online peer-to-peer lending in the aftermath of Dodd-Frank: In search of an evolving regulatory regime for an evolving industry. Washington and Lee Law Review, Forthcoming, University of Toledo Legal Studies Research Paper No 2012–2004. Retrieved SSRN. Scholar
  9. Conroy, P. and O’Leary, H. (2005). Do the Poor Pay More? A Study of Lone Parents and Debt. Dublin: OPEN — One Parent Exchange and Network.Google Scholar
  10. Draut, T. (2005). Strapped: Why America’s 20 and 30-Something’s Can’t Get Ahead. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  11. Drentea, P. and Reynolds, J. R. (2012). Neither a borrower nor a lender be: The relative importance of debt and SES for mental health among older adults. Journal of Aging and Health, 24 (4), 673–695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dwyer, R. E., McCloud, L. and Hodson, R. (2012). Debt and graduation from American Universities. Social Forces, 90 (4), 1133–1155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Financial Services Authority (2009). The impact of life events on financial capability: Evidence from the BHPS. Prepared for the Financial Services Authority. Retrieved. Scholar
  14. Fitch, C., Simpson, A., Collard, S. and Teasdale, M. (2007). Mental health and debt: Challenges for knowledge, practice and identity. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 14 (2), 128–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Greiner, M. E. and Wang, H. (2009). The role of social capital in people-to-people lending market places. ICIS 2009 Proceedings, 29.Google Scholar
  16. Herrero-Lopez, S. (2009). Social interactions in P2P lending. Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Social Network Mining and Analysis, Article No. 3. ISBN: 978–1– 60558–676–2. doi:10.1145/1731011.1731014.Google Scholar
  17. Herzenstein, M., Dholakia, U. M. and Andrews, R. (2010). Strategic herding behavior in peer-to-peer loan auctions. Retrieved SSRN.
  18. Hunt, R. M. (2005). Whither consumer credit counseling? Business Review, 9, 13.Google Scholar
  19. Iyer, R., Khwaja, A. I., Luttmer, E. F. P. and Shue, K. (2009). Screening peers softly: Inferring the quality of small borrowers. NBER Working Paper No 15242.Google Scholar
  20. Kane, M. (2009). Ties run deep between subprime lenders and financial literary groups. The Washington Independent, November 12.Google Scholar
  21. Klafft, M. (2008). Online peer-to-peer lending: A lenders’ perspective. Proceedings of the International Conference on E-Learning, E-Business, Enterprise Information Systems, and E-Government. Retrieved SSRN. Scholar
  22. Lawless, R. M., Littwin, A. K., Porter, K. M., Pottow, J. A. E., Thorne, D. K. and Warren, E. (2008). Did bankruptcy reform fail? An empirical study of consumer debtors. The American Bankruptcy Law Journal, 82 (3), 349–350.Google Scholar
  23. Lin, M., Prabhala, N. R. and Viswanathan, S. (2009). Social networks as signalling mechanisms: Evidence from online peer-to-peer lending. Retrieved on May 20, 2014.∼bakos/wise/papers/wise2009 -p09_paper.pdf.
  24. Mahmud, T. (2012). Debt, discipline and the 99%: Neoliberal political economy and the working classes. (June 1, 2012). Kentucky Law Journal, Forthcoming; Seattle University School of Law Research Paper No. 12–26. Retrieved SSRN.
  25. Manbeck, P. and Hu, S. (2014). The regulation of peer-to-peer lending: A summary of the principal issues. Chapman and Cutler LLP. Retrieved on July 31. _of_Peer-to-Peer_Lending_0414.pdf.
  26. Meltzer, H., Bebbington, P., Brugha, T., Jenkins, R., McManus, S. and Dennis, M. S. (2011). Personal debt and suicidal ideation. Psychological Medicine, 41 (4), 771–778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Petersen, M. A. and Rajan, R. G. (1994). The effect of credit market competition on lending relationships. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110 (2), 407–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Petersen, M. A. and Rajan, R. G. (2002). Does distance still matter? The informa- tion revolution in small business lending. Journal ofFinance, 57, 2533–2570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Pope, D. G. and Sydnor, J. R. (2008). What’s in a picture? Evidence of discrimina- tion from Retrieved SSRN. Scholar
  30. Renton, P. (2012). Peer to peer lending crosses $1 billion in loans issued. Techcrunch. Retrieved on February 25, 2014.
  31. Schicks, J. (2014). Over-indebtedness in Microfinance –- an empirical analysis of related factors on the borrower level. World Development, 54, 301–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Walker, C. (2011). Personal debt, cognitive delinquency and techniques of governmentality: Neoliberal constructions of financial inadequacy in the UK. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 22, 533–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. White House (2009). Press Release, Office of the Press Secretary of the White House, Fact Sheet: Reforms to Protect American Credit Card Holders. Retrieved.
  34. Witte, D. S. (2010). The bear hug that is crushing debt-burdened Americans: Why overzealous regulation of the debt-settlement industry ultimately harms the consumers it means to protect. The Texas Review of Law & Politics, 14, 277–298.Google Scholar
  35. Woolsey, B. and Schulz, M. (2009). Credit card statistics, industry facts, debt statistics, Retrieved.
  36. Yum, H., Lee, B. and Chae, M. (2012). From the wisdom of crowds to my own judgment in microfinance through online peer-to-peer lending platforms. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 11 (5), 469–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Ceylan Cizmeli and Mert Demir 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ceylan Cizmeli
  • Mert Demir

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations