The Effects of Global Knowledge Reservoirs on the Productivity of Multinational Enterprise: The Role of International Depth and Breadth

  • Mario I. Kafouros
  • Peter J. Buckley
  • Jeremy Clegg
Chapter

Abstract

This study rests upon the premise that differences in the productivity performance of multinational enterprises (MNEs) stem from variations in their ability to access and combine globally distributed knowledge reservoirs within one organization. Its contribution lies in demonstrating that this important source of variation is determined by (a) the idiosyncratic manner in which the MNE’s network of subsidiaries is structured, (b) the international breadth and depth of this network and (c) its location choices in the global landscape. We find that when multinationals spread their operations across many geographical markets, they benefit from knowledge externalities more than when they concentrate their activities in few countries. We further show that the ability to exploit spatially distant knowledge depends not only on idiosyncrasies specific to the MNE, but also on exogenous forces associated with international variations in appropriability regimes and industryspecific technological opportunities. As our study considers how the subsidiaries of the MNE collectively influence the productivity of the entire group, it captures complementarities and synergies within the group, and deepens understanding of how MNE-specific and location bound factors jointly shape performance outcomes.

Keywords

Knowledge Spillover Location Choice External Knowledge Intellectual Property Right Multinational Enterprise 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adams, J.D., Jaffe, A.B., 1996. Bounding the effects of R&D: an investigation using matched establishment-firm data. The RAND Journal of Economics 27 (4), 700–721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aiken, L.S., West, S.G., 1991. Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. Sage Publications, California.Google Scholar
  3. Alcácer, J., Chung, W., 2007. Location strategies and knowledge spillovers. Management Science 53 (5), 760–776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Allen, L., Pantzalis, C., 1996. Valuation of the operating flexibility of multinational corporations. Journal of International Business Studies 27 (4), 633–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Almeida, P., Kogut, B., 1999. Localization of knowledge and the mobility of engineers in regional networks. Management Science 45 (7), 905–917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Argyres, N.S., 1996. Capabilities, technological diversification and divisionalization. Strategic Management Journal 17, 395–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Argyres, N.S., Silverman, B.S., 2004. R&D, organization structure, and the development of corporate technological knowledge. Strategic Management Journal 25, 929–958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Attewell, P., 1992. Technology diffusion and organizational learning: the case of business computing. Organization Science 3 (1), 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Audretsch, D.B., Feldman, M.P., 1996. R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production. American Economic Review 86, 630–640.Google Scholar
  10. Baldwin, W.L., Scott, J.T., 1987. Market Structure and Technological Change. Harwood Academic Publishers, London.Google Scholar
  11. Bayoumi, T., Coe, D., Helpman, E., 1999. R&D spillovers and global growth. Journal of International Economics 47, 399–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Beaudry, C., Schiffauerova, A., 2009. Who’s right, Marshall or Jacobs? The localization versus urbanization debate. Research Policy 38, 318–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Belderbos, R., Zou, J., 2009. Real options and foreign affiliate divestments: a portfolio perspective. Journal of International Business Studies 40, 600–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bell, M., Albu, M., 1999. Knowledge systems and technological dynamism in industrial clusters in developing countries. World Development 27 (9), 1715–1734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bernstein, J.I., Mohnen, P., 1998. International R&D spillovers between U.S. and Japanese R&D intensive sectors. Journal of International Economics 44, 315–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bettis, R.A., 1981. Performance differences in related and unrelated diversified firms. Strategic Management Journal 2 (4), 379–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Birkinshaw, J., Hood, N., 1998. Multinational subsidiary evolution: capability and charter change in foreign-owned subsidiary companies. Strategic Management Journal 23 (4), 773–795.Google Scholar
  18. Branstetter, L., 2001. Are knowledge spillovers international of intranational in scope? Microeconometric evidence from the US and Japan. Journal of International Economics 53 (1), 53–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Buckley, P.J., Carter, M.J., 2004. A formal analysis of knowledge combination in multinational enterprises. Journal of International Business Studies 35, 371–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Cantwell, J., 1989. Technological Innovation and Multinational Corporations. Basil Blackwell, Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
  21. Cantwell, J., Piscitello, L., 2000. Accumulating technological competence: its changing impact on corporate diversification and internationalization. Industrial and Corporate Change 9 (1), 21–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Cantwell, J., Mudambi, R., 2005. MNE competence-creating subsidiary mandates. Strategic Management Journal 26, 1109–1128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Capar, N., Kotabe, M., 2003. The relationship between international diversification and performance in service firms. Journal of International Business Studies 34 (4), 345–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Cassiman, B., Veugelers, R., 2006. In search of complementarity in innovation strategy: internal R&D and external knowledge acquisition. Management Science 52 (1), 68–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Cheng, Z., Nault, B.R., 2007. Industry level supplier-driven IT spillovers. Management Science 53 (8), 1199–1216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Chesbrough, H.W., 2003. Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  27. Chung, W., Alcácer, J., 2002. Knowledge seeking and location choice of foreign direct investment in the United States. Management Science 48 (12), 1534–1554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Clark, B., Griliches, Z., 1984. Productivity and R&D at the firm level in French manufacturing. In: Griliches, Z. (Ed.), R&D, Patents, and Productivity. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 393–416.Google Scholar
  29. Coe, D., Helpman, E., 1995. International R&D spillovers. European Economic Review 39, 859–887.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Cohen, W.M., Levinthal, D.A., 1990. Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly 35 (1), 128–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Cohen, W.M., Nelson, R.R., Walsh, J.P., 2002. Links and impacts: the influence of public research on industrial R&D. Management Science 48 (1), 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Dierickx, I., Cool, K., 1989. Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage. Management Science 35 (12), 1504–1511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Dodgson, M., 1993. Organizational learning: a review of some literatures. Organization Studies 14 (3), 375–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Dosi, G., Marengo, L., Pasquali, C., 2006. How much should society fuel the greed of innovators? On the relations between appropriability, opportunities and rates of innovation. Research Policy 35, 1110–1121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Escribano, A., Tribó, A., Fosfuri, J.A., 2009. Managing external knowledge flows: the moderating role of absorptive capacity. Research Policy 38, 96–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Feinberg, S.E., Gupta, A.K., 2004. Knowledge spillovers and the assignment of R&D responsibilities to foreign subsidiaries. Strategic Management Journal 25, 823–845.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Fisch, J.H., 2003. Optimal dispersion of R&D activities in multinational corporations with a genetic algorithm. Research Policy 32, 1381–1396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Frost, T.S., 2001. The geographic sources of foreign subsidiaries’ innovations. Strategic Management Journal 22 (2), 101–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Geringer, J.M., Beamish, P.W., da Costa, R.C., 1989. Diversification strategy and internationalization: implications for MNE performance. Strategic Management Journal 10, 109–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Gomes, L., Ramaswamy, K., 1999. An empirical examination of the form of the relationship between multinationality and performance. Journal of International Business Studies 30 (1), 173–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Goto, A., Suzuki, K., 1989. R&D capital, rate of return on R&D investment and spillover of R&D on Japanese manufacturing industries. The Review of Economics and Statistics 71 (4), 555–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Grant, R., 1996. Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal 17, 109–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Griliches, Z., 1979. Issues in assessing the contribution of research and development to productivity growth. Bell Journal of Economics 10, 92–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Griliches, Z., 1992. The search for R&D spillovers. Scandinavian Journal of Economics 94, 29–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Grossman, G.M., Helpman, E., 1991. Trade, knowledge spillovers, and growth. European Economic Review 35 (3), 517–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Gupta, A.K., Govindarajan, V., 2000. Knowledge flows within multinational corporations. Strategic Management Journal 21 (4), 473–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Hambrick, D.C., Macmillan, I.C., 1985. Efficiency of product R&D in business units: the role of strategic context. Academy of Management Journal 28 (3), 527–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Harhoff, D., 2000. R&D spillovers, technological proximity, and productivity growth—evidence from German panel data. Schmalenbach Business Review 52, 238–260.Google Scholar
  49. Hitt, M., Hoskisson, R., Kim, H., 1997. International diversification: effects on innovation and firm performance in product-diversified firms. Academy of Management Journal 40 (4), 767–798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Jaffe, A.B., Trajtenberg, M., Henderson, R., 1993. Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 108 (3), 577–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Ito, B., Wakasugi, R., 2007. What factors determine the mode of overseas R&D by multinationals? Empirical evidence. Research Policy 36, 1275–1287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Iwasa, T., Odagiri, H., 2004. Overseas R&D, knowledge sourcing, and patenting: an empirical study of Japanese R&D investment in the US. Research Policy 33, 807–828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Kafouros, M.I., 2005. R&D and productivity growth: evidence from the UK. Economics of Innovation and New Technology 14 (6), 479–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Kafouros, M.I., Buckley, P.J., 2008. Under what conditions do firms benefit from the research efforts of other organizations? Research Policy 37 (2), 225–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Kafouros, M.I., Buckley, P.J., Sharp, J.A., Wang, C., 2008. The role of internationalization in explaining innovation performance. Technovation 28 (1–2), 63–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Katila, R., Ahuja, G., 2002. Something old, something new: a longitudinal study of search behaviour and new product introduction. Academy of Management Journal 45 (6), 1183–1194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Keller, W., 2002. Geographic localization of international technology diffusion. American Economic Review 92 (1), 120–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Klevorick, A.K., Levin, R.C., Nelson, R.R., Winter, S.G., 1995. On the sources and significance of interindustry differences in technological opportunities. Research Policy 24 (2), 185–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Kogut, B., Zander, U., 1993. Knowledge of the firm and the evolutionary theory of the multinational corporation. Journal of International Business Studies 24, 625–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Kurokawa, S., Iwata, S., Roberts, E.B., 2007. Global R&D activities of Japanese MNCs in the US: a triangulation approach. Research Policy 36, 3–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Kotabe, M., Dunlap-Hinkler, D., Parente, R., Mishra, H.A., 2007. Determinants of cross-national knowledge transfer and its effect on firm innovation. Journal of International Business Studies 38, 259–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Lahiri, N., 2010. Geographic distribution of R&D activity: how does it affect innovation quality? Academy of Management Journal 53 (5), 1194–1209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Laursen, K., Salter, A., 2006. Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovative performance among UK manufacturing firms. Strategic Management Journal 27 (2), 131–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Leiponen, A., Helfat, C.E., 2010. Innovation opportunities, knowledge sources, and the benefits of breadth. Strategic Management Journal 31 (2), 224–236.Google Scholar
  65. Levin, R.C., Klevorick, A.K., Nelson, R.R., Winter, S.G., 1987. Appropriating the returns from industrial research and development. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 3, 783–820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Mairesse, J., Hall, B., 1996. Estimating the productivity of research and development in French and US manufacturing firms: an exploration of simultaneity issues with GMM methods. In: Van Ark, B., Wagner, K. (Eds.), International Productivity Differences and their Explanations. Elsevier Science, 285–315.Google Scholar
  67. MacGarvie, M., 2006. Do firms learn from international trade? Review of Economics and Statistics 88, 46–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Marshall, A., 1920. Principles of Economics. Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
  69. McGahan, A.M., Silverman, B.S., 2006. Profiting from technological innovation by others: the effect of competitor patenting on firm value. Research Policy 35, 1222–1242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Miller, J.D., 2006. Technological diversity, related diversification, and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal 27 (7), 601–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Miller, J.D., Fern, M.J., Cardinal, L.B., 2007. The use of knowledge for technological innovation within diversified firms. Academy of Management Journal 50 (2), 308–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Nelson, R.R., Winter, S.G., 1982. An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  73. Pakes, A., Schankerman, M., 1984. The rate of obsolescence of patents, research gestation lags, and the private rate of return to research resources. In: Griliches, Z. (Ed.), R&D, Patents and Productivity. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 98–112.Google Scholar
  74. Park, W.G., 2008. International patent protection: 1960–2005. Research Policy 37 (4), 761–766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Penner-Hahn, J., Shaver, J.M., 2005. Does international research and development increase patent output? An analysis of Japanese pharmaceutical firms. Strategic Management Journal 26, 121–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Pisano, G., 2006. Profiting from innovation and the intellectual property revolution. Research Policy 35, 1122–1130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Phene, A., Almeida, P., 2008. Innovation in multinational subsidiaries: the role of knowledge assimilation and subsidiary capabilities. Journal of International Business Studies 39, 901–919.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Quintas, M.A., Vaizquez, X.H., Garciĭa, J.M., Caballero, G., 2008. Geographical amplitude in the international generation of technology: present situation and business determinants. Research Policy 37, 1371–1381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Rosenberg, N., 1974. Science, invention, and economic growth. Economic Journal 84, 90–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Rosenkopf, L., Almeida, P., 2003. Overcoming local search through alliances and mobility. Management Science 49, 751–766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Salomon, R., Jin, B., 2008. Does knowledge spill to leaders or laggards? Exploring industry heterogeneity in learning by exporting. Journal of International Business Studies 39, 132–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Santos, J., Doz, Y., Williamson, P., 2004. Is your innovation process global? Sloan Management Review 45 (4), 31–37.Google Scholar
  83. Scherer, F.M., 1982. Inter-industry technology flows and productivity growth. The Review of Economics and Statistics 64 (4), 627–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Singh, J., 2008. Distributed R&D, cross-regional knowledge integration and quality of innovative output. Research Policy 37 (1), 77–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Tallman, S., Li, J., 1996. Effects of international diversity and product diversity on the performance of multinational firms. Academy of Management Journal 39 (1), 179–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Tallman, S., Phene, A., 2007. Leveraging knowledge across geographic boundaries. Organization Science 18 (2), 252–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Tang, C.Y., Tikoo, S., 1999. Operational flexibility and market valuation of earnings. Strategic Management Journal 20 (8), 749–761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Teece, D.J., 1986. Profiting from technological innovation. Research Policy 15, 285–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Tihanyi, L., Johnson, R.A., Hoskisson, R.E., Hitt, M.A., 2003. Institutional ownership differences and international diversification: the effects of boards of directors and technological opportunity. Academy of Management Journal 46 (2), 195–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Tsai, W., 2001. Knowledge transfer in intraorganizational networks: effects of network position and absorptive capacity on business unit innovation and performance. Academy of Management Journal 44 (5), 996–1004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Uzzi, B., Gillespie, J.J., 2002. Knowledge spillover in corporate financing networks: embeddedness and the firm’s debt performance. Strategic Management Journal 23 (7), 595–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Wooldridge, J.M., 2002. Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  93. Zahra, S.A., 1996. Governance, ownership, and corporate entrepreneurship: the moderating impact of industry technological opportunities. Academy of Management Journal 39 (6), 1713–1735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Zahra, S.A., Ireland, D.R., Hitt, M.A., 2000. International expansion by new venture firms: international diversity, mode of market entry, technological learning, and performance. Academy of Management Journal 43 (5), 925–950.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Zhao, M., 2006. Conducting R&D in countries with weak intellectual property rights protection. Management Science 52 (8), 1185–1199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Mario I. Kafouros, Peter J. Buckley, and Jeremy Clegg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mario I. Kafouros
    • 1
  • Peter J. Buckley
    • 1
  • Jeremy Clegg
    • 1
  1. 1.Leeds University Business SchoolUniversity of LeedsLeedsUK

Personalised recommendations