Re-examining an Ethics of Citizenship in Postsecular Societies
Jürgen Habermas is, without any doubt, one of the most influential, albeit not undisputed, authors in the debate about ‘postsecularity’, ‘post-secularism’, ‘the postsecular’, ‘postsecular societies’, and so forth. Unlike many other authors who use these concepts to describe and explain the continuing presence of religion in contemporary ‘modern’ societies (see Beckford, 2012), the core of Habermas’s notion of the postsecular society is normative. It includes an ethics of citizenship that aims at making it possible that all citizens can participate as equals in democratic procedures, including public political debate about matters of common interest, and hence in co-determining the development of their society. This contribution critically examines Habermas’s proposal of an ethics of citizenship in postsecular societies in view of the question whether it is able to adequately deal with problems that arise in public controversies about particular verbal and non-verbal acts of expression, namely acts which are understood by their authors as contributions to public debate, which are experienced by numerous believers as denigration of their religion, and as offence to their religious sensibilities. Controversies about such acts offer especially interesting possibilities for an investigation of normative dimensions of the notion of the postsecular and post-secular societies, respectively.
KeywordsPublic Debate Epistemic Attitude Religious Language Public Culture Secular Society
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Baumgartner, C. (2013). ‘Secular Critique of Protests against Religiously Offensive Acts. A Threat Against Democracy?’ In G. Buijs, T. Sunier, and P. Versteeg (eds) Risky Liaisons? Democracy and Religion: Reflections and Case Studies, 112–127. Amsterdam: VU University Press.Google Scholar
- Boe, C. and Hervik, P. (2008). ‘Integration through Insult?’ In E. Eide, R. Kunelius and A. Phillips (eds) Transnational Media Events. The Mohammed Cartoons and the Imagined Clash of Civilizations, 213–234. Gothenburg, Sweden: Nordicom.Google Scholar
- Brink, B.van den (2007). ‘Imagining Civic Relations in the Moment of their Breakdown: A Crisis of Civic Integrity in the Netherlands.’ In A.S. Laden and D. Owen (eds) Multiculturalism and Political Theory, 350–373. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Dillon, M. (2012). ‘Jürgen Habermas and the Postsecular Appropriation of Religion: A Sociological Critique.’ In P.S. Gorski, D.K. Kim, J. Torpey, and J. VanAntwerpen (eds) The Postsecular in Question. Religion in Contemporary Society, 249–278. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
- Hirsi Ali, A. (2006). ‘The Right to Offend.’ Speech delivered in Berlin, 9 February 2006. NRC Handelsblad, 10 February 2006. Retrieved from http://www.nrc.nl/opinie/article1654061.ece/The_Right_to_Offend.
- Huntington, S. (1996). The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
- Klausen, J. (2009). The Cartoons That Shook the World. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
- Levey, G.B. and Modood, T. (2009). ‘Liberal Democracy, Multicultural Citizenship and the Danish Cartoon Affair.’ In G.B. Levey and T. Modood (eds) Secularism, Religion and Multicultural Citizenship, 216–242. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Naef, S. (2007). Bilder und Bilderverbot im Islam. Vom Koran bis zum Karikaturenstreit. München: Verlag C.H. Beck.Google Scholar
- Peters, P. (2008). Public Deliberation and Public Culture. The Writings of Bernhard Peters1993–2005. Edited by H. Wessler. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
- Rose, F. (2006). ‘Why I Published Those Cartoons.’ Washington Post. 19 February. Retrieved from http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/02/17/AR2006021702499.html.
- United Nations Department of Public Information, Secretary General SG/2105. (2006). ‘Joint UN, European Union, Islamic Conference Statement Shares “Anguish” of Muslim World at Muhammad Caricatures, but Condemns Violent Response.’ Retrieved from http://www.un.org/News/Press/docs/2006/sg2105. doc.htm.Google Scholar
- Wessler, H. and Wingert, L. (2008). ‘Study of the Public Sphere. Bernhard Peters’ Interest and Contribution.’ In B. Peters (author) and H. Wessler (ed.) Public Deliberation and Public Culture. The Writings of Bernhard Peters1993–2005, 1–13. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar