Introductory Notes

  • Rosi Braidotti
  • Bolette Blaagaard
  • Tobijn de Graauw
  • Eva Midden

Abstract

This collection of edited essays aims to explore the so-called ‘postsecular condition’ from a variety of disciplinary angles and from different but intersecting theoretical and political perspectives. Originally coined by Jürgen Habermas, the term ‘postsecular’ has been adopted in a broad range of intellectual and theoretical traditions and has gained widespread currency. Of pivotal importance in this discourse is the ‘secularization myth’, so prominent in the West, which has been questioned by recent religious resurgence. This myth connects secularism with progress and modernity on the back of religious backwardness (Jakobsen and Pellegrini, 2008). Secularism is moreover counted among the ideologies that spell danger to democracy in Europe by not sufficiently recognizing the importance of religious and multicultural identities and their implications for active citizenship (Modood, 2007). The postsecular turn seeks to provide a counter-discourse to the myth of secularism by developing a variety of critiques of the myth grounded in discussions on the current political, social, and technological condition in which Europe, in particular, and the Western world more generally, finds itself. What the concept — the postsecular — means and stands for, however, is far from clear. Even though much has been written recently on the postsecular turn or condition, there is no agreement on how to conceptualize the term and connect it to current developments in our societies.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Asad, T. (2003). Formations of the Secular: Christianity, Islam, Modernity. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Benhabib, S. (2002). The Claims of Culture. Equality and Diversity in the Global Era. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Borradori, G. (2003). Philosophy in a Time of Terror. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bracke, S. (2012). ‘Secularization Theories and Islam. How the Narrative of “Pillarization” Frames Muslims and Refigures Dutch Identity in Times of Civilization.’ Journal of Muslims in Europe 1(1).Google Scholar
  5. Braidotti, R. (1992). ‘On the Female Feminist Subject, or: From “She-Self” to “She-Other”.’ In G. Bock and S. James (eds) Beyond Equality and Difference. Feminist Politics and Female Subjectivity, 177–192. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Braidotti, R. (2002). Metamorphoses. Towards a Materialist Theory of Becoming. Cambridge and Malden, MA: Polity Press/Blackwell Publishers Ltd.Google Scholar
  7. Braidotti, R. (2006). Transpositions: On Nomadic Ethics. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  8. Braidotti, Rosi (2008). ‘Inspite of the Times: The Postsecular Turn in Feminism.’ Theory, Culture & Society 25(6), 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Braidotti, R. (2013). The Posthuman. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  10. Brown, A. (2011). ‘Anders Breivik’s spider web of hate.’ The Guardian, 7 September 2011 http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2011/sep/07/anders-breivik-hatemanifesto [last accessed 20 March 2014].
  11. Connolly, W. (1999). Why Am I Not a Secularist? Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  12. Eisenstadt, S.N. (2000). ‘Multiple Modernities.’ Daedalus 129(1): 1–29.Google Scholar
  13. Fukuyama, F. (2002). Our Posthuman Future. Consequences of the BioTechnological Revolution. London: Profile Books.Google Scholar
  14. Gellner, E. (1992). Postmodernism, Reason and Religion. London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Habermas, J. (2003). The Future of Human Nature. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  16. Habermas, J. (2008). ‘Notes on a Postsecular Society.’ New Perspectives Quarterly 25(4), 17–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Habermas, J. and Ratzinger, J. (2005). The Dialectics of Secularization. San Francisco, CA: Ignatius Press.Google Scholar
  18. Huntington, S. (1998). The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  19. Jakobsen, J.R. and Pellegrini, P. (eds) (2008). Secularisms. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Levmore, S. and Nussbaum, M. (eds) (2010). The Offensive Internet: Speech, Privacy, and Reputation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Mahmood, S. (2005). Politics of Piety. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Modood, T. (2007). Multiculturalism: A Civic Idea. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  23. Nussbaum, M. (1999). Cultivating Humanity: A Classical Defense of Reform in Liberal Education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Nussbaum, M. (2006). Frontiers of Justice. Disability, Nationality, Species Membership. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Rose, N. (2001). ‘The Politics of Life Itself.’ Theory, Culture & Society 18(6): 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Scott, J. (2007). The Politics of the Veil. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Sloterdijk, P. (2009). ‘Rules for the Human Zoo: A Response to the “Letter on Humanism”.’ Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 27: 12–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Taylor, C. (2007). A Secular Age. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Rosi Braidotti, Bolette Blaagaard, Tobijn de Graauw and Eva Midden 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rosi Braidotti
  • Bolette Blaagaard
  • Tobijn de Graauw
  • Eva Midden

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations