Performing Speciation: The Nature/Culture Divide at the Creation Museum

  • Angenette Spalink
  • Scott Magelssen

Abstract

This essay concerns the historiographic constructions of time, space, and matter as produced and performed by Answers in Genesis, a non-profit Christian apologetics ministry, in its Creation Museum, “[a] state-of-the-art 70,000 square foot museum” in Petersburg, Kentucky. The museum “brings the pages of the Bible to life”1 by steering its visitors through slick displays and interactive exhibits, effectively mobilizing visitors’ bodies to “bring to life” the story of young-earth creationism, a literal interpretation of Judeo-Christian scriptures that maintains the earth is only a little over six thousand years old. Creation Museum visitors find not only biblical simulations with animatronic dinosaurs sharing the garden of Eden with Adam and Eve, they also encounter a reconstruction of “Lucy,” the hominid fossil scientists identify as an early ancestor of contemporary humans (figure 1.1). Rather than standing upright like an early human, however, the Creation Museum’s figure hunches in a simian pose, knuckles dragging, spine parallel to the ground. Through exhibits like Lucy, the museum, while recognizing the existence of fossils as evidence of life forms that no longer inhabit the earth, positions itself against science’s view of the earth as billions of years old, and of the earth’s life forms—especially human beings—as the current state of millions of years of evolutionary change.

Keywords

Nonhuman Animal Strip Mining Sinful Nature Modern Drama Answer Book 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. Arons, Wendy. “Beyond the Nature/Culture Divide: Challenges from Ecocriticism and Evolutionary Biology for Theater Historiography.” In Theater Historiography: Critical Interventions. Edited by Henry Bial and Scott Magelssen. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2010.Google Scholar
  2. Chakrabarty, Dipash. “The Climate of History: Four Theses.” Critical Inquiry 35 (Winter 2009).Google Scholar
  3. Chaudhuri, Una. “Animal Geographies: Zooësis and the Space of Modern Drama.” Modern Drama 46, no. 4 (Winter 2003).Google Scholar
  4. —. “Animal Rites: Performing beyond the Human.” In Critical Theory and Performance. Edited by Janelle G. Reinelt and Joseph R. Roach. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press, 2006.Google Scholar
  5. Creation Museum website. Answers in Genesis. http://creationmuseum.org/. Accessed September 17, 2013.Google Scholar
  6. de Certeau, Michel. “The Laugh of Michel Foucault.” In Heterologies: Discourse on the Other. Translated by Brian Massumi. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1986.Google Scholar
  7. Deleuze, Gilles. Difference and Repetition. Translated by Paul Patton. New York: Columbia University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
  8. Deleuze, Gilles, and Felix Guattari. What Is Philosophy? Translated by Hugh Tomlinson and Graham Burchell. New York: Columbia University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
  9. Dolan, Jil1. “Performance, Utopia, and the ‘Utopian Performative.’” Theatre Journal 53, no. 3 (October 2001).Google Scholar
  10. Dox, Donalee. “The Willing Sustenance of Belief: Religiosity and Mode of Performance.” Journal of Religion and Theatre 8, no. 1 (2009).Google Scholar
  11. Elizabeth Mitchell biography. Answers in Genesis website. http://www.answersingenesis.org/home/area/bios/e_mitchell.asp. Accessed July 19, 2013.Google Scholar
  12. Fletcher, John. “Prepare to Believe: Performing the Evangelical Worldview at the Creation Museum.” Unpublished manuscript shared with the authors.Google Scholar
  13. —. “Tasteless as Hell: Community Performance, Distinction, and Countertaste in Hell House.” Theatre Survey 48, no. 2 (November 2007).Google Scholar
  14. Genesis 1.27–29, The Holy Bible, King James Version. New York: Oxford Edition, 1769.Google Scholar
  15. Gould, Stephen J. “Nonoverlapping Magisteria.” In Philosophy of Religion: An Anthology. Edited by Louis P. Pojman and Michael Cannon Rea. Stamford, CT: Cengage Learning, 2008.Google Scholar
  16. —. Rock of Ages: Science and Religion in the Fullness of Life. New York: Ballantine, 1999.Google Scholar
  17. Ham, Ken. “Creation and Conservation.” Creation 17, no. 4 (1995), 20–23.Google Scholar
  18. —. “Earth Day: A Creationist’s Perspective.” Answers in Genesis website, April 22, 2010. http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/2010/04/22/earth-day-creationist-perspective. Accessed July 8, 2013.Google Scholar
  19. —. The New Answers Book 4: Over 25 Questions on Creation/Evolution and the Bible. Green Forest, AR:New Leaf Publishine Group, 2013.Google Scholar
  20. —. “Why Are There ‘Green’ Crises?” Creation Museum website, September 1, 1995. http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/cm/v17/n4/conservation. Accessed July 19, 2013.Google Scholar
  21. Hodge, Bodie. “Feedback: Why Do You Take the Bible Literally.” AIG website, January 13, 2006. http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/2006/01/13/feedback-why-take-bible-literally. Accessed December 6, 2013.Google Scholar
  22. Hutcheon, Linda. “Historicizing the Postmodern: The Problematizing of History.” In A Poetics of Postmodernism: History, Theory, Fiction. New York:Routledge, 2004.Google Scholar
  23. Ian Miller, William. The Anatomy of Disgust. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
  24. “An Introduction to Evolution.” Understanding Evolution. University of California Museum of Paleontology. October 25, 2013. http://evolution.berkeley.edu/evolibrary/article/0_0_0/evo_02. Accessed December 9, 2013.
  25. Kershaw, Baz. The Politics of Performance: Radical Theatre as Cultural Intervention. New York: Routledge, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lacey, Troy. Answers in Genesis, personal email correspondence, July 8, 2013.Google Scholar
  27. Luke, Timothy W. Museum Pieces: Power Plays at the Exhibition. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2002.Google Scholar
  28. Lyotard, Jean-François. The Differend: Phrases in Dispute. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1991.Google Scholar
  29. Magelssen, Scott. Inquiry electronically submitted to AiG, July 3, 2013.Google Scholar
  30. Marion, Jean-Luc. Being Given: Toward a Phenomenology of Giveness. Translated by Jeffrey L. Kosky. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
  31. May, Theresa J. “Beyond Bambi: Toward a Dangerous Ecocriticism in Theatre Studies.” Theatre Topics 17, no. 2 (2007).Google Scholar
  32. McCarthy, Colmon. “James Watt & the Puritan Ethic.” The Washington Post. May 24, 1981.Google Scholar
  33. Menton, David. Question and answer session following “Body of Evidence.” Lecture. Creation Museum. May 31, 2013.Google Scholar
  34. Mitchell, Elizabeth, and David Menton. “A Look at Lucy’s Legacy.” Answers in Genesis website, June 6, 2012. http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/aid/v7/n1/lucy-legacy. Accessed July 19, 2013.Google Scholar
  35. Muñoz, José Esteban. Cruising Utopia: The Then and There of Queer Futurity. New York: New York University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
  36. National Center for Science Education. “Anti-evolution and Anti-climate Science Legislation Scorecard: 2013,” May 20, 2013. Website. http://ncse.com/evolution/anti-evolution-anti-climate-science-legislation-scorecard-2013. Accessed March 17, 2014.Google Scholar
  37. Rich, Mokoto. “Creationists on Texas Panel for Biology Textbooks.” New York Times, September 29, 2013. http://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/29/education/creationists-on-texas-panel-for-biology-textbooks.html?nl=todaysheadlines&emc=edit_th_20130929&_r=0. Accessed September 29, 2013.Google Scholar
  38. Santa Maria, Cara. “Scopes Monkey Trial Revisited: Tennessee Is Still Officially Anti-evolution as Science Education Bill Passes.” The Huffington Post, March 21, 2012. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/03/20/tennessee-evolution-scopes-education_n_1368636.html. Accessed March 17, 2014.Google Scholar
  39. Spencer, Wayne. “Global Warming and Earth’s Design.” Answers in Genesis website. June 16, 2010, http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/aid/v5/n1/global-warming-and-earth-design. Accessed July 3, 2013.Google Scholar
  40. Starr, Edd. “Can an Evolutionist Celebrate Earth Day?” Answers in Genesis website. April 22, 2006, http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/2006/04/22/evolutionist-celebrate-earth-day. Accessed July 8, 2013.Google Scholar
  41. Stevenson, Jill. “Embodying Sacred History: Performing Creationism for Believers.” TDR: The Drama Review 56, no. 1 [T213] (Spring 2012).Google Scholar
  42. —. Sensational Devotion: Evangelical Performance in the Twenty-First Century. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2013.Google Scholar
  43. “Understanding Evolution.” University of California, Berkeley. http://evolution.berkeley.edu/evolibrary/article/evo_07. Accessed September 19, 2013.
  44. UpChurch, John. “Go Truly Green by Starting with Genesis.” April 22, 2009. http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/2009/04/22/go-truly-green-by-starting-with-genesis. Accessed July 8, 2013.Google Scholar
  45. Watt, James G. Testimony before the House Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs, February 5, 1981.Google Scholar
  46. White, Alan. “Should We Be Concerned about Climate Change?” In The New Answers Book 4: Over 25 Questions on Creation/Evolution and the Bible. Edited by Ken Ham. Green Forest, AR: New Leaf Publishing Group, 2013.Google Scholar
  47. White, Lynn, Jr. “The Historical Roots of our Ecologic Crisis.” In Readings in Biology and Man. Edited by Miguel A. Santos. New York: MSS Information Corporation, 1973.Google Scholar
  48. Wolfe, Cary. Animal Rites: American Culture, the Discourse of Species, and Posthumanist Theory. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Rosemarie K. Bank and Michal Kobialka 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Angenette Spalink
  • Scott Magelssen

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations