Oppositional Imaginations: Multiple Lineages of Feminist Scholarship

  • Uma Chakravarti
Part of the Gender, Development and Social Change book series (GDSC)

Abstract

Feminist scholars have been forthright in their criticism of mainstream academia but have rarely been so forthright in evaluating tendencies manifested within what I would like to call the “women’s studies movement.” Having worked for more than three decades in a women’s college which has the unique distinction of having produced a whole generation of feminists in Delhi, often through activism within the college itself, and watched scores of struggles within the campus on women’s issues, I am convinced that the institutional framework of women’s studies centers can be both enabling and disabling depending on the particular configuration of forces operating in universities. The institutional set-up of women’s studies centers is not necessarily supportive of feminist scholarship, and may actually be obstructive to transforming the universities into spaces for women’s activism and feminist analyses. It is regrettable, but true, that women’s studies centers have functioned within the framework of mainstream patriarchal academia and have reproduced the imbalances of power operating in universities. Feminist scholars have thus, more often than not, worked outside institutional fora, or sought alternative fora, of which fortunately there are many in a university like Delhi’s, especially because of the vibrancy of its women’s colleges; alternatively they have worked as independent scholars, outside institutional affiliation or special funding of any kind.

Keywords

Sexual Harassment Communal Violence Feminist Scholar Woman Student Beauty Contest 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    See, for example, Kumkum Sangari and Sudesh Vaid. “Widow Immolation: Ideologies, Institutions, Practices,” in Kumari Jayawardena and Malathi de Alwiss (eds.), Embodied Violence, Delhi: Kali for Women, 1997;Google Scholar
  2. Bina Agarwal. A Field of One’s Own: Gender and Land Rights in South Asia. Cambri: Cambridge University Press, 1994;Google Scholar
  3. Prem Chowdhry, The Veiled Women: Shifting Gender Relations in Haryana 1880-1990. Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1994;Google Scholar
  4. Ritu Menon and Kamla Bhasin. Borders and Boundaries. Delhi: Kali for Women, 1997;Google Scholar
  5. Urvashi Butalia. The Other Side of Silence. Delhi: Penguin Books, 1998.Google Scholar
  6. Uma Chakravarti, Radhika Singha and Ramya Srinivasan. (eds.). Reliving Miranda. Delhi: Miranda House, 1998.Google Scholar
  7. Radha Kumar. A History of Doing. Delhi: Kali for Women, 1993.Google Scholar
  8. 4.
    Uma Chakravarti. The Social Dimensions of Early Buddhism. Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
  9. 5.
    Uma Chakravarti. “Women in Myth and Literature: A Case Study of the Sita Myth,” Samya Shakti, 1, no. 1, 1983, pp. 68-75.Google Scholar
  10. 7.
    Uma Chakravarti. “The Rise of Buddhism as Experienced by Women,” Manushi, 8, 1984, pp. 5-10.Google Scholar
  11. 8.
    See, for example, Vijaya Ramaswamy. Divinity and Deviance. De: Oxford University Press, 1994 and Walking Naked. Shimla: Indian Institute of Advanced Study, 1997;Google Scholar
  12. Kumkum Sangari. “Mirabai and the Spiritual Economy of Bhakti,” Economic and Political Weekly, 25, no. 27 and 28, 1990, pp. 1464-1475;Google Scholar
  13. 9.
    Uma Chakravarti. “Whatever Happened to the Vedic Dasi? Orientalism, Nationalism and a Script for the Past,” in Kumkum Sangari and Sudesh Vaid (eds.), Recasting Women: Essays on Colonial India, Delhi: Kali for Women, 1989.Google Scholar
  14. 10.
    Uma Chakravarti. “Beyond the Altekarian Paradigm,” Social Scientist, 16, no. 8, 1988, pp. 44-52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 11.
    Gerda Lerner. The Creation of Patriarchy. New York: Oxford University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
  16. 13.
    Uma Chakravarti. “Conceptualising Brahmanical Patriarchy: Gender, Caste, Class and the State,” Economic and Political Weekly, 28, no. 14, 1993, pp. 579-585.Google Scholar
  17. 14.
    Uma Chakravarti. Rewriting History: The Life and Times of Pandita Ramabai. Delhi: Kali for Women, 1998.Google Scholar
  18. 15.
    Uma Chakravarti. Delhi Riots: Three Days in the Life of a Nation. Delhi: Lancer Books, 1987.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Uma Chakravarti 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Uma Chakravarti

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations